on something only a few feet a way. The DOF difference
between 2.5 and 32 was pretty noticable focusing on the some point with the
same lens with an LX.
Steve
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist-D K Mount Question
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: *ist-D K Mount Question
I was playing with an *ist-D and a K lens (the SMC 135 2.5). Shots made
wide
open seemed to be exposed pretty well. If I set the lens to a smaller
aperture, I could see it stop down when
Hi Steve,
on 03 Oct 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Has anyone else noticed the same thing?
I did notice the same. Don't know how to explain that...
Cheers, Heiko
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 7:12 AM
Subject: *ist-D K Mount Question
I was playing with an *ist-D and a K lens (the SMC 135 2.5). Shots made
wide
open seemed to be exposed pretty well. If I set the lens
whats happens
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 20:49:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SV: M42 to K mount question
Hi
Hi Dave
I'm quite sure that the meter is normally not
affected by the mount used.
Provided that the lens
meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]På vegne af David Brooks
Sendt: 31. marts 2002 16:04
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: M42 to K mount question
Thanks Jens.I just find it strange that with an
A or M lens on the K1000, i can get the meter
needle to go from bottom
Hi all.I tried out my new adaptor
yesterday,using a Super Tak 200 f4 on the
K1000.One thing i noticed was the light meter
was noticably slower moving with the 200 that
if the 35-80 or 80-200 was attached.
Is this a common thing.
Mind you the weather has been really cloudy and
windy lately.
mount question
Hi all.I tried out my new adaptor
yesterday,using a Super Tak 200 f4 on the
K1000.One thing i noticed was the light meter
was noticably slower moving with the 200 that
if the 35-80 or 80-200 was attached.
Is this a common thing.
Mind you the weather has been really cloudy and
windy
Answer is somewhere between slim and none.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tiger Moses
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K-mount question
I think I need to clarify, I
Tiger Moses wrote:
I think I need to clarify, I was wondering if there would be a chance we'd
have the opportunity to buy a non-Pentax brand Digital body with a K-AF2
mount on it?
Not the be rude, but don't hold your breath. If Pentax doesn't think there
is enough of a market to make it
Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a 3rd
party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
shown us the way?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Are there any current manufacturers licensed to produce K-mount camera?
I ask because I am wonder once 24x36cm CCDs become common place, is there a
3rd
party (Phoenix) who could put out a body we could buy if the P_Gods haven't
shown us the way?
Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if there
In a message dated 12/6/2001 2:30:36 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ricoh, Casina, Vivitar, and ??? I guess if there would be a point in
history
where Pentax wouldn't make any film based cameras anymore, there would
have
no reason for other manufacturers to
13 matches
Mail list logo
