As others have noted weather in Northeast is miserable early spring.
Starting with Cloudy last night cold rain today. I can expect this
whenever there's an interesting astronomical event.
On 4/14/2014 5:27 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Anyone going to try to photograph the lunar eclipse
Thanks to all who looked and all who commented.
I had a little more time to massage the image over my lunch break. I
think this is a bit of an improvement, but you be the judge:
Original: https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/13871717785/
Improved? :
on 2014-04-15 10:28 Ann Sanfedele wrote
Well I say good job!
How beautiful it is - staying up until 2 am would have been easy for me but we
had solid cloud cover in the Big Apple :-( Foggy and drizzly now - storm
coming..
i just popped out onto my bedroom balcony at twoish (a.m., MST) and
I'm seeing a lot more digital noise in the black of space here.
On 4/15/2014 2:41 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Thanks to all who looked and all who commented.
I had a little more time to massage the image over my lunch break. I
think this is a bit of an improvement, but you be the judge:
Original:
You are right P.J.
Thanks for pointing that out. That's what I get for working on a dusty
monitor. Wiped the dust away and I could clearly see it. DOH!
Back to the drawing board.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:54 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing a lot more digital noise
Anyone going to try to photograph the lunar eclipse tonight?
It will be a bust in the eastern part of the US, but should be
beautiful out west:
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/04/14/total-lunar-eclipse-to-reveal-blood-moon-in-night-sky/
Damn, I wish I could be in Maui tonight. The Kihei
Quoting Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
Anyone going to try to photograph the lunar eclipse tonight?
It will be a bust in the eastern part of the US, but should be
beautiful out west:
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/04/14/total-lunar-eclipse-to-reveal-blood-moon-in-night-sky
Not visible from the U.S.
Hope the weather is good for PDMLers in Africa, Middle East, Indian
Sub-Continent, S.E. Asia, Indonesia, Malaysia Western Australia.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3704 - Release Date:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:25 -0400, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
wrote:
Not visible from the U.S.
Hope the weather is good for PDMLers in Africa, Middle East, Indian
Sub-Continent, S.E. Asia, Indonesia, Malaysia Western Australia.
Geez - they kept that one quiet. I didn't know it was
was far more interested in
watching the stunning sunset. Plus I saw the lunar eclipse in 2007.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks. I missed to as well.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Here's a little video composite showing the last 15-20 minutes or so of the
eclipse from my patio:
http://gallery.me.com/godders#100204
(In testing with different browsers, FireFox
Make that missed it as well. Truly, my typing is a diminishing resource.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I missed to as well.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Here's a little video composite showing
The University of Maryland Observatory was opened this morning for
the lunar eclipse- so I nipped over there, just in time for totality.
Reasonably dark, a good view of the moon, and very thin clouds made
viewing a pleasure. Sorry, I didn't take my camera. Bad move- since
there were
The University of Maryland Observatory was opened this morning for
the lunar eclipse- so I nipped over there, just in time for totality.
Reasonably dark, a good view of the moon, and very thin clouds made
viewing a pleasure. Sorry, I didn't take my camera. Bad move- since
there were
Michael Beacom wrote:
The University of Maryland Observatory was opened this morning for
the lunar eclipse- so I nipped over there, just in time for totality.
Reasonably dark, a good view of the moon, and very thin clouds made
viewing a pleasure. Sorry, I didn't take my camera. Bad move
The squeeze box player was heard to say I don't do jigs
OFF with his head, then.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
The University of Maryland Observatory was opened this morning for
the lunar eclipse- so I nipped over there, just in time for totality.
Reasonably dark, a good view of the moon, and very thin clouds made
viewing a pleasure. Sorry, I didn't take my camera. Bad move- since
there were Morris
Here's a little video composite showing the last 15-20 minutes or so of the
eclipse from my patio:
http://gallery.me.com/godders#100204
(In testing with different browsers, FireFox played it immediately. Safari had
to have its caches cleared, quit and restart, then it played it properly.)
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Here's a little video composite showing the last 15-20 minutes or so of the eclipse from my patio:
http://gallery.me.com/godders#100204
(In testing with different browsers, FireFox played it immediately. Safari had
to have its caches cleared, quit and restart, then
Ann Sanfedele wrote on Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:11:38 -0800
I don't have quick time so couldn't watch - I do have the latest version of
Firefox.
sigh
Ann, there is a version of FireFox for Windows. It's a free download at the
Apple.com site: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/
Regards,
; SeePhoto Talk seeph...@micapeak.com;
BAPhotoShooters baphotoshoot...@yahoogroups.com; PDML List
PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: VESO 2010 - lunar eclipse - GDG
Here's a little video composite showing the last 15-20 minutes or so of
the eclipse from my patio:
http
Sounds good, but next time take your camera! :-) Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Michael Beacom mbea...@mac.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net;
howardas...@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:34 AM
Subject: A Fine Lunar Eclipse, and a Good
On 23/02/08, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Compositeweb.jpg
Ooooh.
Nice, if cheesy.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Different, but i like it.
By composite, do you mean cut and paste into PS etc, or did you do
this with the multy exposure mode.
Dave
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I
Dave, it is a cut and paste.
I need a lot more practice with PS, in the Layers area in particular.
Walt
On 2/24/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different, but i like it.
By composite, do you mean cut and paste into PS etc, or did you do
this with the multy exposure mode.
Dave
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, it is a cut and paste.
I need a lot more practice with PS, in the Layers area in particular.
As do i.:-)
Dave
Walt
On 2/24/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Different, but i like it.
By
On Feb 23, 2008, at 20:46, Walter Hamler wrote:
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Compositeweb.jpg
That's fun - I like it!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
: PESO: Lunar Eclipse Composite
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Compositeweb.jpg
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 8:46 PM
Subject: PESO: Lunar Eclipse Composite
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Compositeweb.jpg
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Feb 23, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
This is my first attempt at one of these composites. My son had to
help me but now I think I could do it by myself.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Compositeweb.jpg
Now that's pretty wacky! :-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thats a good one Stan.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Stan Halpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my contribution...
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p612914030/?photo=h350883AE#889750446
K10D, FA*-200/4 macro
stan
On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:29 PM, William Robb wrote:
Great
Nice capture.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Here's my contribution...
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p612914030/?photo=h350883AE#889750446
K10D, FA*-200/4 macro
stan
On 20/2/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Technical:
K10, ISO 400
A600/5.6 at f6.3 for 1/4 second
Processed with Kodak Digital Gem for noise reduction.
Lovely shot Bill.
You have an eye for heavenly bodies.
--
Cheers,
Excellent, Bill. The thought of trying to shoot the eclipse came to
me for about a second last night. The outdoor temperature chased it
immediately. You are a brave man.
Paul
On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last
Good one Bill. I shot to about 7/8 covered, but i didi not see that
redness here, so i went to bed.:-0
Dave
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot
before my fingers fell
off.
On 2/21/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot
before my fingers fell
off.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Very nice, Bill. My fingers were falling off too.
Not as good as yours, but my
William Robb wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last
shot before my fingers fell off.
I hate it when that happens.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Technical: K10, ISO 400 A600/5.6 at f6.3 for 1/4 second Processed
with Kodak
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:29 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot
before my fingers fell
off.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Great shot!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Nice capture. A little earlier than when I viewed it.
Is this full frame?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot
Excellent! We had clouds for the entire duration of the eclipse. Of
course, later on, after it was over, we had clear skies. Grrr.
Yeah, I was all set up with 400/5.6 + 2x, but throughout the
totality we were also overcast in totality. I got a couple minute window
about halfway
Mat Maessen wrote:
On 2/21/08, William Robb warobb at gmail.com wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/testscans/IMGP2162.jpg.html
Both are very nice photos! Thanks for sharing!
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Very nice!
G
On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:29 PM, William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Technical:
K10, ISO 400
A600/5.6 at f6.3 for 1/4 second
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Nice capture. A little earlier than when I viewed it.
Is this full frame?
Probably closer to 50% of the frame. I have the 1.4x-L converter, but I haven't
yet been able to
make a sharp photo using
Nice one Bill. I too got some shots through a telescope.
Here is one from the mid point of the eclipse from here in central FL.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/_IGP5472.jpg
Walt
On 2/21/08, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out.
Where can I find the requisite adapters to mount my camera to my
scope? I have one of the smaller reflectors but it seems worth a try
if the adapters don't cost moer than the telescope.
John Graves
WA1JG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Walter Hamler wrote:
Nice one Bill. I too got some shots through
- Original Message -
From: John Graves
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Where can I find the requisite adapters to mount my camera to my
scope? I have one of the smaller reflectors but it seems worth a try
if the adapters don't cost moer than the telescope.
Tom Cakalic
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Nice one Bill. I too got some shots through a telescope.
Here is one from the mid point of the eclipse from here in central FL.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/_IGP5472.jpg
Good one
Also a nice capture.
I thought about trying to capture it with my 600 either the 1.4X-L or 2.0
X-L but it was in the single digits I wanted to keep my fingers.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lunar
John, check out http://www.telescope.com
They sell adapters for 1.25 and 2 focusers that use t-mount adapters
to attach a camera to a scope.
If you have a refractor reaching focus should not be a problem. A
reflector might offer problems in that there may not be enough infocus
travel to reach
Beautiful eclipse photos, everyone!
I had a fine full moon over my balcony earlier in the evening and
took this photo with my smc PENTAX-M 1:4 200mm plus Jessops 2x
teleconverter. Not too bad with this simple setup, I think.
http://mac.tidings.nu/PinkyPentax/Images/Pentax/Various/Moon.jpg
I
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent, Bill. The thought of trying to shoot the eclipse came to
me for about a second last night. The outdoor temperature chased it
immediately. You are a brave man.
I tried it, but was using such a sucky lens that the results are not
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Picture
On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent, Bill. The thought of trying to shoot the eclipse came to
me for about a second last night. The outdoor temperature chased it
immediately. You
Here's my contribution...
http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p612914030/?photo=h350883AE#889750446
K10D, FA*-200/4 macro
stan
On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:29 PM, William Robb wrote:
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last
shot before my fingers fell
off.
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot before
my fingers fell
off.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Technical:
K10, ISO 400
A600/5.6 at f6.3 for 1/4 second
Processed with Kodak Digital Gem for noise reduction.
William Robb
--
Very nice, indeed!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 9:29:51 PM, you wrote:
WR Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was
WR the last shot before my fingers fell
WR off.
WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
WR Technical:
WR K10,
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:29 PM
Subject: Lunar Eclipse Picture
Great conditions, though perhaps a bit nippy out. This was the last shot
before my fingers fell
off.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/new/eclipse.html
Technical:
K10, ISO 400
A600/5.6 at f6.3 for 1/4 second
On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070826.html
I'm planning to be out watching a lunar eclipse this time tomorrow.
I can put money on cloudy weather...
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
I hope the sky here is clear tomorrow.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/27/07, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 27, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070826.html
I'm planning to be out watching a lunar eclipse this time tomorrow.
I can put money
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070826.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
There is an interesting phot of the recent lunar eclipse on the
Astronomy Picture of the Day page for Nov3, 2004:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
What are you guys shooting at? f/1.4 with a 10,000mm lens? For an example
with
the 135mm f4.7 on the Graphic set to f/4.7 and infinity everything from 94
feet
to the Andromeda Galaxy is in focus (I use that lens because it is one I
have
calculated). So if my focus
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, wendy beard wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/35618348
I discovered that I'm useless when it comes to manual
focusing. It was cold out too so the camera was
probably shivering :-s
I think the Earth moved for you ;-)
Kostas (maybe the moon too :-)
-known issue among
astrophotographers.
Please also read my previous message on this same topic.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
What are you guys shooting
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick 'n dirty:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red_moon.jpg
Cropped a bit.
--
Mark Roberts
Cool.
Better than mine.
My pic is well blurry. Could have been the equipment
of course ;-)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/35618348
I discovered
wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick 'n dirty:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red_moon.jpg
Cropped a bit.
Cool.
Better than mine.
My pic is well blurry. Could have been the equipment of course ;-)
U..?
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you could have a
focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
--
Mark Roberts wrote:
wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick 'n dirty:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Graywolf wrote:
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you
could have a focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
Long lenses don't always are set to infinity at the end of the scale. If
getting the moon in focus only had required to turn the
with me, at 300mm, I had
to focus slightly nearer than infinity for the sharpest image.
In the end I suspect I will be too embarrased to show anything.
Tom C.
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
Date: Thu, 28
Probably a little slack built into the lens to accommodate thermal
expansion.
t
On 10/28/04 10:41, Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Graywolf wrote:
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you
could have a focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
In the end I suspect I will be too embarrased to show anything.
Not feeling well Tom?
William Robb
I took a stab at shooting last night. Used *istD, K 300/4 + 2x Kenko
AF converter. Got several shots somewhat like Marks, though I don't
think any are quite as sharp as the one he presented (nice shot
Mark!). These two I rather liked. The first because the shadowed
part of the moon is still
For me it was a wasted effort, other than I learned/was taught to member
what I forgot for next time.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:56:59 -0600
- Original
Graywolf wrote:
U..?
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you could have a
focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
actually, I THink when you are using big glass it ISNT at infinity - but I know it
sounds odd.
I did think it was camera shake or moon
NASA sez it's at the 238,855 miles mark.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
actually, I THink when you are using big glass it ISNT at infinity - but I know it
sounds odd.
The stop may not be infinity but the mark should be. My Graphic focuses past
infinity, that does not mean i can not set it there. Also anything between
infinity and the hyperfocal distance should be sharp so you probably only have
to be within a quarter turn of the focus ring.
I notice in
That would be infinity on any lens shorter than 393 miles in focal length.
GRIN!
--
Caveman wrote:
NASA sez it's at the 238,855 miles mark.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
actually, I THink when you are using big glass it ISNT at infinity -
but I know it
sounds odd.
--
graywolf
Graywolf wrote:
The stop may not be infinity but the mark should be. My Graphic focuses
past
infinity, that does not mean i can not set it there. Also anything between
infinity and the hyperfocal distance should be sharp so you probably only
have
to be within a quarter turn of the focus ring.
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
For me it was a wasted effort, other than I learned/was taught to
member what I forgot for next time.
At least you got to see it. It was so foggy here last night I could
just about see across the street.
William
: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
Better than mine.
My pic is well blurry. Could have been the equipment
of course ;-)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/35618348
the infinity mark isn't actually focused for an object at infinity except at
a specific temperature.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
U..?
Surely
Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
U..?
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you could have a
focus problem. Autofocus problem yes, focus no.
Nope. With big glass there's always some range beyond infinity to
accommodate thermal expansion.
--
Mark Roberts
THe Red Sox were amazing
Note the 86 years since last win and the loss to the Mets in 1986
I hadn't thought of that. :) Queens girl that I am, I was rooting for the
Mets the last time around...
Manny said You make your own destination :) when he got the MVP
Yeah, I caught that, thought it
at
a specific temperature.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse under way!
U..?
Surely the moon is at infinity. I can not even begin to see how you could
have a
focus
Amita Guha wrote:
THe Red Sox were amazing
Note the 86 years since last win and the loss to the Mets in 1986
I hadn't thought of that. :) Queens girl that I am, I was rooting for the
Mets the last time around...
I was doing the same -- MOOOKIE :)
Manny said You make your own
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:41:32 +0200 (MEST), Anders Hultman wrote:
Long lenses don't always are set to infinity at the end of the scale.
When my Sigma 400/5.6 APO Macro is set at infinity, it has another 10*
or so of rotation left (beyond infinity), at 65*F ambient temperature.
It was dark so I
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:30:28 -0600, William Robb wrote:
At least you got to see [the lunar eclipse]. It was so foggy here last
night I could just about see across the street.
It wasn't that bad here, but a 10/10 cover rolled in over my house just
about the time that the eclipse reached
For Details, see:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
.
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lunar Eclipse Tonight
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:32:49 -0400
For Details, see:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
Hi,
I think I'm going to try to shoot it too.. Moonrise here (California)
is at 6 pm and totality is between 7.23 pm and 8.45 pm.. I guess I'll
try to shoot the onset of totality when the moon is lower in the sky.
It's cloudy here too, though, and there's a thunderstorm forecast - I
hope that
Badri A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I'm going to try to shoot it too.. Moonrise here (California)
is at 6 pm and totality is between 7.23 pm and 8.45 pm.. I guess I'll
try to shoot the onset of totality when the moon is lower in the sky.
It's cloudy here too, though, and there's a
Mark Roberts wrote:
(For once it's *not* cloudy in
Pittsburgh! Who'da thunk?)
Something's wrong. RUN !
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/lunar-eclipse.shtml
Tom C.
From: Badri A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse Tonight
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:34:08 -0700
Hi,
I think I'm going to try to shoot it too.. Moonrise here
Absolutely clear skies and a great view of the moon from my bedroom
window!
ist-D, Sigma EX 300/2.8 and 2x teleconverter in operation here.
:-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Mark Roberts wrote:
Absolutely clear skies and a great view of the moon from my bedroom
window!
ist-D, Sigma EX 300/2.8 and 2x teleconverter in operation here.
:-)
ditto that
but I do't think I can get a decent shot - hope you do mark
(I keep running back and forth between the TV on the
Wish I had that luck! It's completely clouded over here and I can't
even see the eclipse!
I don't have a long tele, so I was planning to try multiple exposures
using an old beat-up Yashica A TLR - well, maybe next time!
Do show us what you get, Mark.. Badri
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:55:11
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Absolutely clear skies and a great view of the moon from my bedroom
window!
ist-D, Sigma EX 300/2.8 and 2x teleconverter in operation here.
:-)
ditto that
but I do't think I can get a decent shot - hope you do mark
(I keep running
Quick 'n dirty:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red_moon.jpg
Cropped a bit.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Mark Roberts wrote:
Quick 'n dirty:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/red_moon.jpg
Cropped a bit.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Thank you for sharing that! lovely!
I watched it through binocs from the roof
so beautiful! but I didnt ahve the glass to even
I went out with my SFX and the MX, loaded the SFX with my consumer grade
Tokina 70-210 and my consumer grade 2x Vivitar teleconverter.
I don't expect sharp pictures, I'll be happy as long as there's
SOMETHING on that roll.
Sheesh, I freezed my butt off out there, it was -2 and the time here is
101 - 200 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
