Mark Cassino wrote:
At first I didn't thin that this missing AF point was bit deal, but having
used the camera a bit, there have been times when I wished it was there.
I don' tthink it has anything to do with the Latin vs Nippon alphabet. My
guess is that it has to do with how the active
with the MZ-S pattern myself.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Frantisek Vlcek
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MZ-S AF pattern - strange verticals?
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why do you
At first I didn't thin that this missing AF point was bit deal, but having
used the camera a bit, there have been times when I wished it was there.
I don' tthink it has anything to do with the Latin vs Nippon alphabet. My
guess is that it has to do with how the active AF sensor is displayed
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why do you think (if you find it lacking)
MZ-S lacks a bottom (far-right when vertical) AF point? For me, it
would make AFing portraits pretty difficult, as we (the part of
PDML using Latin alphabet or writing in leftright direction) tend
to read photos
Of Frantisek Vlcek
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MZ-S AF pattern - strange verticals?
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, why do you think (if you find it lacking)
MZ-S lacks a bottom (far-right when vertical) AF point? For me, it
would make AFing portraits
5 matches
Mail list logo
