The Minox is one of the finest objects I ever touched: it over 40 years
old and it looks and works as if it was brand new. It is a lot different
from every other camera I used, I've been practicing using it with no
film for now. With some practice I think I'll be able to frame without
aiming through the viewfinder. This morning on the subway I took close
up pictures of interesting people just handling the camera as if it was
something else. Now I wish I had film in the camera.

On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:13, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
> 
> > I just received the brand new Minox B I bought cheap from Ebay and
> > I'm feeling very excited.
> 
> I hope you enjoy your Minox. They're quirky and fun. I've been  
> shooting with Minox cameras for many years. I have Minox IIIS, B, C,  
> EC and CLX models, spanning 1954 to 2000 vintage.
> 
> > Checked the meter sensitivity against my DS and the Minox is
> > overexposing by a full F stop, or I guess the DS may be underexposing
> > a bit: without exposure compensation no areas on my photos ever reach
> > full brightness (checking on the histogram) but I suppose this is  
> > good.
> 
> The Minox B's selenium cell meter is certainly no model for  
> accuracy ... never was, and it is now 30+ years old. Don't trust it,  
> learn what it's telling telling you but also learn to estimate exposure.
> 
> > Film size is only 8x11mm but that won't stop me from having fun.
> > I'll start by trying some close-up street photography, this camera is
> > so small, side by side with the DS it doesn't even look like a camera.
> >
> > Cheap scanners don't have enough optical resolution to fully  
> > capture the
> > detail on this very small (I should use 25 ASA film and the Minox lens
> > is very sharp) so I think my best choice would be using some bellows
> > with my M 50mm F4 Macro lens to re-shoot the images with my DS.
> 
> Two small galleries of photos from my Minox work:
> 
>    http://homepage.mac.com/godders/PhotoAlbum36.html
>    http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/minox-00-01/
> 
> These were made with a Minox EC. The first set was Minopan 100 (Agfa  
> APX100) @ EI200 in XTOL 1:1, negs scanned on an Epson 2450 at  
> 2400ppi. The second set was Minopan 25 (Agfa APX25) @EI50 in XTOL  
> 1:1, negs scanned on a Minolta Scan Dual II at 2820ppi. I've made  
> 6x8" prints from both of these sets that look good (the low-rez web  
> versions don't do them justice).
> 
> I have tons more Minox pictures that are not on my current website.  
> Perhaps I'll dredge a few more galleries out of my local archive...
> 
> I've been scanning Minox negatives with the DS using an A50/2.8 Macro  
> and extension tubes to achieve a 2:1 magnification ... Haven't  
> printed any yet, but that gives me a very nice 2000x2750 pixel  
> (5.1Mpixel) image to work with. From that, I am sure I can make  
> excellent 11x14 and larger prints.
> 
> Ask me anything about Minox stuff ... ;-)
> 
> Godfrey
> 
> 

Reply via email to