On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The latest news, he's ditching Pentax to complain about Canon. We should
only be so lucky.
He apparently left the Pentax Forums last month or so. Canon owners
are less forgiving than we are.:-)
I read his blog on
AFAIK most of his so called tests and stories have been based on
bodies he may have handled but not even own (in most cases).
Draw your own conclusions...
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:00 AM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Just don't read Ricewhine's measurbator blog on the K7's
The latest news, he's ditching Pentax to complain about Canon. We
should only be so lucky.
Thibouille wrote:
AFAIK most of his so called tests and stories have been based on
bodies he may have handled but not even own (in most cases).
Draw your own conclusions...
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:00
Better quantified this time.
Yesterday I took stance on a bridge above a highway, and photographed
large trucks coming towards me. The speed limit at this place is 100
km/h, and on top of a gentle slope. I shot series of each truck, and
have tallied the percentage of out-of-focus shots from each
Good to know. It's what I suspected based on use, but it's nice to
know that my suspicions aren't just wishful thinking. Thanks for
taking the time to test.
Paul
On Jul 18, 2009, at 7:09 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
Better quantified this time.
Yesterday I took stance on a bridge above a highway,
The test having been done hand held, might one factor have been the K-7's claim
of improved SR.(?)
Jack
--- On Sat, 7/18/09, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: More K-7 AF observations
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml
, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: More K-7 AF observations
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, July 18, 2009, 5:20 AM
Good to know. It's what I suspected
based on use, but it's nice to
know that my
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: More K-7 AF observations
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, July 18, 2009, 5:58 AM
Could be, of course. For the DA*300/4
anyway. However the %-wise
improvement is comparable for the two lenses.
Jostein
2009/7/18 Jack Davis jdavi
Jack Davis wrote:
It's been claimed by some that when panning they've found it
a benefit to turn off the SR.
Hmmm, I've never tried explicitly testing panning with SR on or off.
When I got the K10D I found that it helped enough with vertical movement
during panning that I never tried turning
I always pan with SR on. In fact, I shoot off a tripod with SR on.
Doesn't make any difference IMO. In fact, I didn't see anything in the
K7 manual about turning it off for tripod shooting, although the K20D
did suggest that it SR be switched off. Of course I've only skimmed
the K7 manual.
Just don't read Ricewhine's measurbator blog on the K7's autofocus
tracking. It will either shake your confidence or infuriate you. I
found it by accident, and wish I hadn't clicked on the link. Not
because I much care what he thinks, but I don't want to up his Google
rating. He's another
11 matches
Mail list logo
