to convince people that I was right in the first
place.
Jeez, I am one sorry individual...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
And well you should...
Cotty wrote
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not really that good at the insults.
I know.
For a real master, I suggest that
you search the archives for a fellow named Mafud...
Don't need to search no archives. I was on the list long before he entered and think I
have a fairly big collection of
individual...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
And well you should...
Cotty wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Cheers,
Cotty
...
with an emphasis on the ;-)!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
I was just being agreeable, (you don't want me to start ranting, trust
me). I suppose I
lol, nope, mine is going to be...
so much testosterone, so little bandwidth...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: A QUICKIE Was: My own DOF confusion
So
and you know the job was done right
-Original Message-
From: zoomshot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: A QUICKIE Was: My own DOF confusion
We needed a Sargent-at-Arms, before the name calling degenerates into a
free
I hear ya mate! And this is where the great Aussie saying of no worries!
becomes very appropriate!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
Having been taken
lol!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2004 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Being British also, I'd like to apologise
At 21:31 2004.03.23 -0500, you wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Will you apologize for Jaguars as well?
CRB
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip).
At the moment, both you and Collin are close to hitting my auto
delete, which is something I don't do lightly.
William Robb
Better believe it! William and I have had wars that may have spilt blood if
we weren't on
Nah, they're owned by Ford now - the blame was sold as part of the
package ;-)
S
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
At 21:31 2004.03.23 -0500, you wrote:
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Will you apologize for Jaguars as well?
CRB
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:32:51 +, you wrote:
I don't think members should put political opinions in sig lines. This
one offends me, and others may have problems with it too.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
People talk about kill-filing contributors who get under their skin, but how
many actually do it, I wonder.
regards,
Anthony Farr
In PDML I've killfiled Mafud, Gregory/The Who, and their ilk; that's about it.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: RE: My own DOF confusion
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Wow, I thought that was just us
WW
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Being British also, I'd like to apologise for Cotty's apology.
Being Canadian, I'd like to apologize for the whole damned lot of
you
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
I'm not really that good at the insults. For a real master, I
suggest that
you search the archives for a fellow named Mafud...
Those were the days, by gumm
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being British, I'd just like to apologise.
Being British also, I'd like to apologise for Cotty's apology.
Being Canadian, I'd like to apologize for the whole damned lot of
you, and for
They may be using different definitions of what is concidered to be sharp. Pentax
uses a circle of confusion (CoC) being 0,035mm. If The Industar lens uses a larger
CoC it may explain the difference. Otherwise it may not be exactly 50mm...
DagT
Fra: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alin, and others who answered,
I think you're right. It actually did not occur to me that COF can be
different and so of course the reliability of the markings...
No, I don't think I am going to throw this lens against brick wall
shooting and testing. I am just going to use it and see how
Re: My own DOF confusion
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:39:29 +0300
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
Few days ago I received my own pancake lens. This is probably the
cheapest one - Industar 50-2 (50mm f/3.5) lens. I've been told that
being relatively
Hi!
Naturally, I meant to say COC not COF. Typo.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:55:14 +0300
Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right. It actually did not occur to me that COF can be
different and so of course the reliability of the markings...
Boris
Hi!
The loss sustained with standard lens designs for 35mm outfits is
something to get used to when going to medium- and large-format
designs. Using a Tessar design may provide a better image
perspective and you may be either pleased or disapppointed with what
you see -- depending on your
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: My own DOF confusion
Hello.
Few days ago I received my own pancake lens. This is probably the
cheapest one - Industar 50-2 (50mm f/3.5) lens. I've been told that
being relatively slow and being based on classic Tessar formula
Hi!
Raimo K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like in the former Soviet Union they had larger circles of
confusion -
big country, big tolerances, we used to say.
All the best!
Raimo K
LOL.
Alin
Rule of thumb is appr. (AFAIR) 1/3 in front of focus point, 2/3 behind.
All the best
Jens
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. marts 2004 12:30
Til: Boris Liberman
Emne: Re: My own DOF
You might also notice another DOF difference that's obvious
when one thinks about it.
A lens @ max aperture f3.5 is automatically SHOWING more DOF in finder
than a 1.7! So you always SEE more right from the start!
It would be like keeping your 1.7 lens @ 3.5 and holding in the DOF
Preview all the
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
Keep an eye on the Left.
They complain any time we go after any group that hates America.
They were ambivalent about going after Al Queda going
At 20:57 2004.03.22 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:08:35 +
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lasse
At 20:57 2004.03.22 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:23:43 +0200
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: My own DOF confusion
At 18:10 2004.03.22 -0500, you wrote:
From
Lasse Collin:
Surely your dispute could be taken off-list?
Thanks.
Hi!
LK No, I won't, you arrogant little piece of shit!
LK Not as long as you keep trolling, littering this list and
LK pissing in decent list member's faces with your moronic American
LK right wing preachings.
Keep an eye on the Left.
They complain any time we go after any group that hates
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
