thanks Jeff.. I usually get one a year in the fall - so should be good :-)
ann
On 11/1/2018 10:25 PM, PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com wrote:
They are great Ann and so glad you have gotten over your cold. I hope
you stay cold free during the wintertime.
Jeffery Johnson | Photo Captures by Jeffery
They are great Ann and so glad you have gotten over your cold. I hope
you stay cold free during the wintertime.
Jeffery Johnson | Photo Captures by Jeffery
https://www.PhotoCapturesbyJeffery.com
/Diverse range of photography Artistic - Animals - Events/Festivals -
Transportation - Pets -
I know.. coals to New castle - but some of you lot do have a habit of
buying them anyway.
Thye are here
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks
Glimpses of the City is the new one... but there may be one of the
others that you would prefer and had no bought
well both parts relate to my Pentax photography ...
The bad news is The Comfort (diner/restaurant) on Grand street where my
photos were
exhibited this spring is no longer open.. so the only place you can see
that now is on my web page.But the sadness I feel is for
the owner , who I've know for
Now there is a really great price as my starting point for this stuff..
and this time I have pictures
I'm beyond broke so I hope somebody wants this stuff
http://www.ebay.com/itm/190685454725?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
lens
easier ;)
CW
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 6:28 PM
Subject: NO FS this Friday?
Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total
at KEH,
Ebay looks to have
:28 PM
Subject: NO FS this Friday?
Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total at KEH,
Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill, and nothing at
all offered on the PDML...
How's a guy supposed to enable himself these days?
Cory
spent a lot of money
that + the rebate made buying a
new lens
easier ;)
CW
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 6:28 PM
Subject: NO FS this Friday?
Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viewing from an armchair, its not at all consistent.
What IS consistent is the common theme of I am always superior to you
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
I mean really, how the hell are you supposed to respond to childish
gibberish like that?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/02/09 Fri PM 03:11:38 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED
wilson
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 7:17 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
From: J. C. O'Sealion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying
I mean really, how the hell are you supposed to respond to childish
gibberish
It seems most of what you post is a simple editing error. The rest
is abject stupidity.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:17 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
its a simple editing error, whats childish about that?
Still waiting for your answer WR,. ( should have read are you OR
are you
not?)
--
PDML
: NO FS this Friday?
It seems most of what you post is a simple editing error. The rest
is abject stupidity.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:17 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
its a simple editing error, whats childish about that?
Still waiting for your answer WR,. ( should have read are you OR
are you
As I told you before, I don't care what you say.
Why argue posts (... another little editing error? ...) with an idiot?
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:39 AM, whoopee cushion wrote:
[something nonsensical]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
As I told you before, I don't care what you say.
Why argue posts (... another little editing error? ...) with an idiot?
Apparently my theory that Anna Nicole Smith and JCO being the same person
was wrong
As I said, why argue with an idiot? Attempt rational discussion?
laughable notion.
JCO Filter switched back on. Bye bye.
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 10:11 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
[more useless drivel]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
09, 2007 12:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
As I told you before, I don't care what you say.
Why argue posts (... another little editing error? ...) with an idiot?
G
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:39 AM, whoopee cushion wrote:
[something nonsensical]
--
PDML Pentax
thank god, I have had it with you.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
As I said, why argue with an idiot? Attempt
I mean really, how the hell are you supposed to respond to childish
gibberish like that?
Just wait
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: RE: NO FS
It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to replace
perfectly function lenses for a marginal increase in performance and
functionality. Mandated deprication (read: loss of aperture coupler)
aside, obtaining 95% of the optical performance for 10% of the expense
sounds like
you are calling not performing as well. I dont
think its fair or show's much understanding
to describe them that way when you are using
DA lenses optimized for APS on APS with FF lenses
which are optimized for FF but not using
them FF and are only using them on APS. Sure
This
yep, I meant comparing instead of using.
Thanks for the clarification request.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:19 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
you
and
higher level DSLR bodies with FF if wanted or needed...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:16 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
It must be nice to be able
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
If I had to buy all new lenses for any DSLR,
I wouldnt buy a pentax DSLR. The main advantage
of buying a Pentax DSLR is if you already have
a bunch of Pentax Lenses. If you dont or have
to, or need to buy
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
Bullshit
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
For the hobbyist, it's a lot harder to justify big money on lenses
that produce images at best marginally better than older, cheaper ones
(provided they're willing to forgo the nicey new features like AF
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
Bullshit. It's part and parcel of what the lens can do.
William Robb
So, without
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:52:09 -0500 (EST)
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size, not feature set
issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether.
Bullshit. It's part and parcel of what
--
So, without consideration of operator error, what exactly does a
new lens' feature set do to improve the resultant picture quality? The
improved contrast of having autofocus? The increase of sharpness due to
not having an auto-aperture? Bullshit.
If you're too damn lazy to
If you only consider one parameter when you are making an equipment
purchase you
are a fool.
Glass quality is certainly the most important part of a lens buying
decision,
but it isn't the only part.
In context, a couple of people on list have noted that the newer lenses do
a
better job of
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:19:37AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
But calling someone who wants to take advantage of pattern evaluative
metering, linked AE and focus point, MTF prioritized exposure
metering, automatic recognition of lens focal length for image
stabilization, improved
DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to
replace
perfectly function lenses for a marginal increase
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill, I respectfully disagree with you here. Your achievements have nothing
to do with whether someone else knows what they're talking about.
True, but they at least give my opinions some credibility
My objective opinion is that this thread is degenerating
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you only consider one parameter when you are making an equipment
purchase you
are a fool.
Did anyone say that?
Glass quality is certainly the most important part of a lens buying
decision,
but it isn't the only part.
In context, a couple of people on list have noted
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Composition trumps all. :-)
At least is is actually completely separate from equipment.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:56 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday
On 2/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a hint that because I am finding the options that lenses designed to
complement my camera give me are desirable, that i am somehow a lazy
photographer. I take umbrage with that.
If you weren't lazy you'd be toting a ten pound
Quoting J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screw you, I know more about what I was talking
about and what I posted than you do.
Nice that you think so.
Dag, Godfrey and myself all seem to have experienced something that disagrees
with you regarding film optimized lenses though.
Pentax and the
You're right, John. I now use TAv 75% of the time. It's a terrific feature.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:19:37AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
But calling someone who wants to take advantage of
If you want to buy a camera and take advantage of half of what you
paid for by using old lenses on it, that's your choice. No question
that you can do some nice work if you know what you're doing.
It's a cost/benefit ratio for me. I'm personally OK with having a
little more manual
] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:06 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
If I had to buy all new lenses for any DSLR,
I wouldnt buy a pentax DSLR. The main
My objective opinion is that this thread is degenerating into a war of harsh
words, when you both, in reality, believe exactly the same thing.
There was a hint that because I am finding the options that lenses designed to
complement my camera give me are desirable, that i am somehow a lazy
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related
to format (sensor) size
So, without consideration of operator error, what exactly does a
new lens' feature set do to improve the resultant picture quality? The
improved contrast of having autofocus? The increase of sharpness due to
not having an auto-aperture? Bullshit.
If you're too damn lazy to use
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
--
So, without consideration of operator error, what exactly does a
new lens' feature set do to improve the resultant picture quality? The
improved contrast of having autofocus? The increase of sharpness due to
not having an auto-aperture
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 8. februar 2007 18:20
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses
on
a APS body which is like zooming in on the flaws.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
DagT
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Just a small comment:
My A*135mm 1.8
All those features mentioned below by Godrey DiGiorgi
will not make ANY DA/APS lens/format perform as well as a really good
FF pentax Lens ( even some of the SMCT screwmounts over
30 years old ) on a good FF camera in terms of sheer
image quality. This is what I have been talking about
in
There was a hint that because I am finding the options that lenses designed
to
complement my camera give me are desirable, that i am somehow a lazy
photographer. I take umbrage with that.
William Robb
Understood.
I'm curious if there are any lens test sites that compare chromatic
aberration
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Quoting Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Composition trumps all. :-)
At least is is actually completely separate from equipment.
William Robb
--
PDML
Hey! I didn't know you were a Hokie!
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory
Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
My objective opinion is that this thread
: NO FS this Friday?
What I don't understand is why people are so aggressively defending their
position in this debate. It is just tools ;-)
WHO'S A TOOL? I take offense to that... J/K... ;-)
-Cory
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On 2/08/07 2:07 PM, Tim Øsleby, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand is why people are so aggressively defending their
position in this debate. It is just tools ;-)
Isn't it? :-).
One day, they say oh it's just a tool and another day, excluding all but
their own equipment and how
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 8. februar 2007 18:20
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
All of my comments made in this thread regarding
APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
If you weren't lazy you'd be toting a ten pound Canon.
Doesn't a 10 pound 6x7 count for anything around here?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
JCO wrote:
...but to say these OLD lenses are
not as good as DA lenses is really not true. They are
DIFFERENT, not better or worse...
I can agree with this. It very much depends on shooting conditions,
application, aperture, etc. Are the DA lenses *more* demonstrably
different/better
- Original Message -
From: K.Takeshita
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
What IS consistent is the common theme of I am always superior to you :-).
We use Pentax, we are superior.
WW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the
additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher quality
photographs than are possible with older lenses.
If I implied
-- Original message --
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the
additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher quality
photographs than are possible with older lenses.
it's
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
Quoting J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Screw you, I know more about what I was talking
about and what I posted than you do.
Nice that you think so.
Dag, Godfrey and myself all seem to have experienced something that
disagrees with you
On 2/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
If you weren't lazy you'd be toting a ten pound Canon.
Doesn't a 10 pound 6x7 count for anything around here?
Damn. I'll try again later.
--
Scott
If you weren't lazy you'd be toting a ten pound Canon.
Doesn't a 10 pound 6x7 count for anything around here?
William Robb
That must have been after you started whimping out then? ;-)
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
I'm curious if there are any lens test sites that compare chromatic
aberration and other factors of DA lenses with their closest legacy
equivalent. I haven't looked but I'd be interested in seeing some data
: NO FS this Friday?
What I don't understand is why people are so aggressively defending their
position in this debate. It is just tools ;-)
WHO'S A TOOL? I take offense to that... J/K... ;-)
-Cory
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thats what I have already posted about a dozen times!
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:26 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
-- Original
On 2/08/07 2:18 PM, Tom C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It makes a weird sort of marketing sense,
but I'd like to see numbers and photos showing exactly how the optics of the
newer lenses are *demonstrably* better than the legacy lenses, especially
considering the image circle from a legacy lens
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
All those features mentioned below by Godrey DiGiorgi
will not make ANY DA/APS lens/format perform as well
List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the
additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher quality
photographs than are possible
On 2/08/07 2:41 PM, William Robb, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What IS consistent is the common theme of I am always superior to you :-).
We use Pentax, we are superior.
I of course emphatically have to agree with that!
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
I'm curious if there are any lens test sites that compare chromatic
aberration and other factors of DA lenses with their closest legacy
equivalent. I haven't looked but I'd be interested
On 2/08/07 2:39 PM, Tom C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...but to say these OLD lenses are
not as good as DA lenses is really not true. They are
DIFFERENT, not better or worse...
I can agree with this. It very much depends on shooting conditions,
application, aperture, etc. Are the DA lenses
Bang on!
Tom, you are one of the most rational people in this list! I'm impressed.
Of course most of people here are rational, too :-).
Ken
I'm having a relatively good day. :-)
Tom C. (who saw Blue Man Group last night)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the
additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED
My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So
distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never mount it on the K10D again.
Immediately sold it on eBay ($440) to one who shoots only film. DA 16
-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:27:59 -0800 (PST)
My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So
distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never mount
On 09/02/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So
distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never mount it on the K10D again.
Immediately sold it on eBay ($440) to one who shoots only film.
DA 16~45 f/4 edge performance blew it away at
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
--
What WR has just posted below is very true, BUT IT CONTRADICTS
his earlier strong opposite position in another long thread where I
stated that
in general, 35mm lenses are sharper than MedFormat lenses
I agree.
On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, John. I now use TAv 75% of the time. It's a terrific
feature.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:19:37AM -0800, Godfrey
in the image?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:27:59 -0800 (PST)
My A-20mm f/2.8 performed
Interesting. The A-20 f/2.8 wide edges actually had a smeared look
about them.
Jack
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/02/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So
distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never
It's one of those things that I wasn't particularly impressed by
when I first saw the write-up on the camera. But once you've used
it you realise just how convenient it is.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:34:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, John. I now use TAv 75% of the time.
of
these observations for reference.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Jack Davis
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED
My A-20mm f/2.8
at this point
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 4:09 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday
Lack of sleep or extreme pride will do it too you. I speak from
experience. LOL
Jack
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob's come to expect everthing to look smeared since he became a
father.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
what is the Tav exposure mode( how does it operate)?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Francis
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
It's one of those things that I
Rob's come to expect everthing to look smeared since he became a
father.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Davis
Interesting. The A-20 f/2.8 wide edges actually had a smeared look
about them.
Jack
--- Digital
DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to
replace
perfectly function lenses for a marginal
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
WELL THEN, are you are are you not saying that the
format a lens is designed for ( film or sensor size ) does or does
not affect affect the maximum lens performance possible
of a given focal length? Its time
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
--
What WR has just posted below is very true, BUT IT CONTRADICTS his
earlier strong opposite position in another long thread where I stated
that in general, 35mm
. februar 2007 20:15
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
What I don't understand is why people are so aggressively defending their
position in this debate. It is just tools ;-)
WHO'S A TOOL? I take offense to that... J/K... ;-)
-Cory
Tim
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
And furthermore, your comments that PENTAX medimum
format lenses resolve quite a bit lower than average
is horseshit and it only further supports my point
that generally 35mm lenses resolve better
On 2/08/07 6:05 PM, P. J. Alling, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or maybe they could spec. a sensor like the Kodak sensor optimized for
corner and edge light capture that Leica is using in the M8 without the
mistake they made in cover plate/filter stage which is causing so much
fun... (It is
List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
It's one of those things that I wasn't particularly impressed by
when I
first saw the write-up on the camera. But once you've used it you
realise just how convenient it is.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:34:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You're
On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Whoopee Cushion wrote:
How many times do I have to post it? ...
Zero. I for one would be happy if you didn't post at all.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
, February 08, 2007 5:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
It's one of those things that I wasn't particularly impressed by
when I
first saw the write-up on the camera. But once you've used it you
realise just how convenient it is.
On Thu, Feb 08
.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
