On 12/31/2019 11:38 AM, Richard Klein wrote:
"Wi-Fi 6" is the latest standard, and one of the noted improvements they
made with that standard was it's ability to communicate with many devices
simultaneously. If you're going to upgrade now, look for Wi-Fi 6.
I think David Cogen's series of
"Wi-Fi 6" is the latest standard, and one of the noted improvements they
made with that standard was it's ability to communicate with many devices
simultaneously. If you're going to upgrade now, look for Wi-Fi 6.
I think David Cogen's series of Decodr videos on Youtube covers it:
Well, not computer really but routor question. My relatively ancient D-Link
router circa 2004, is no longer up to the task.
So, rather than doing the research myself, I thought I would ask her
because most everybody here knows more than I do anyway.
Now for the dumb computer question: what is a
Hi William
you can configure -- Spam rules -- new rule a new rule in Norton Anti
Spam to treat everything including text pentax-discuss@pdml.net in the
sender address as non spam.
greetings
Markus
Hi, I am hoping someone can help me with this.
I filter anything addresses to Pentax Discuss into
Since you have two partitions, and not two physical drives, (if I have
understood it correctly) you can safely ignore that message.
It talks about performance because it thinks you have two distinct drives.
With two drives you can read/write on both in the same time, so having those
large files
that means you have your image files on D already.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 1:19 AM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
*eek* I changed my PS Scratch disks as suggested
or the data partition, but can't see any difference in
performance.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
the more free space on a drive, the less likely a drive
In a message dated 3/28/2004 5:53:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The number one culprit behind file fragmentation is Internet Explorer's
Temporary Internet files. Especially if you don't delete them each time you
close the browser.
My favourite configuration of drives is
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
I've never used PS. But from people are saying it must use one
LARGE scratch
file. What is the purpose of this? Some sort of buffering
Marnie asked:
I've never used PS. But from people are saying it must use one LARGE
scratch
file. What is the purpose of this? Some sort of buffering? For memory
control?
Making it faster? Or providing a workspace? Like the edit/paste space that
the Windows Clipboard provides?
Marnie aka
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
Jostein, how can you tell when PS is using the scratch file?
tan.
Um...
Distinctive grunts from the box
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
how can you tell when PS is using the scratch file?
The hard drive runs pretty much continuously.
William Robb
On 28 Mar 2004 at 16:13, Herb Chong wrote:
it always does, even on tiny files. it backs up what is in memory so that if PS
runs out of space in RAM and there is a copy on disk, it doesn't have to write
it to disk again. you find out things like this reading the Photoshop Plugin SDK
On 29 Mar 2004 at 9:31, Rob Studdert wrote:
The general rule of thumb is don't assign your PS scratch disk to the same drive
as your Windows swap file resides on.
Further to this if any Windows users wish to assess their actual physical hard
drive speeds in order to assess where to assign
Since they put the paging file on the FAT partition, I remember that
there may be a legitimate reason to set up
a machine with a NTFS and FAT partition. Supposedly there is a
performance gain from using FAT for that
purpose. Just how much is a question since I never notice a perceptible
Large reversable history among other things.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/28/2004 5:53:12 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The number one culprit behind file fragmentation is Internet Explorer's
Temporary Internet files. Especially if you don't delete
really work with partitioned drives. As I mention
above, I'd use the D: drive for your data.
Cheers
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27/03/04 23:50:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT - A computer Question
resize the two partitions to be about 80G for your C drive and everything
else for your D drive.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 6:50 PM
Subject: OT - A computer Question
resize the two partitions to be about 80G for your C drive and everything
else for your D drive.
Herb
I am not an IT expert, but my understanding is that the drives should not
be kept at such big sizes. Especially the OS and ones that have progs on
them. They get fragmented easily -
... BUT, the C: is formatted as NTFS and
the D: is FAT32 - Can anyone explain THIS?
The plot thickens...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
i don't know who
Message -
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
I am not an IT expert, but my understanding is that the drives should not
be kept at such big sizes. Especially the OS and ones that have progs on
them
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: OT - A computer Question...
Oh, AND this probably makes a huge difference in what all of this means
and
I should have posted it originally... BUT, the C: is formatted as NTFS
and
the D: is FAT32 - Can anyone explain THIS?
At 10:41 AM 28/03/2004, you wrote:
the more free space on a drive, the less likely a drive will have file
fragmentation. with NTFS, the cluster size stays at 4K all the way out past
200GB. if Tanya continues to shoot RAW at the rate that she describes, she
will shoot about 4-6 GB of images each
(i.e scratch) Meant i.e. restore. Usually I let my typing mistakes go by, not
worth bothering to correct. But that mistake made what I said slightly
confusing.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-specific things on the C drive all the time.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
BUT why would you want to have so much space on your C. Have
10-20Gb
Hi!
Tanya, my humble suggestion to your problem would be like this:
1. Get yourself a small, say 20 GB HD and make it your system disk.
Doing so would mean re-installing your OS and s/ware but this can be
done, I hope.
2. Take the whole of the 100 GB HD you have and partition it to your
liking.
.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT - A computer Question...
i don't know who configured your computer, but i can't imagine a restore
drive being more than about 5 or 10 GB. 60 GB
Seems that whoever set up your machine has made it difficult
for you. However, it should be fairly simple to change the
location of the paging file. I think I did that on my Win
XP machine.
BTW, if you have enough memory and disk space, having the
paging file and the scratch disk on the same
In a message dated 3/27/2004 9:48:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, the partitioning is done for two reasons, first to hide the recovery
information, It used to be that recovery disks were included with the
computer. People keep losing them, and when they need them,
On Tuesday, November 13, 2001, at 10:20 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
If you had my printer you would want to change the halftone screen. Or
don't
you think inkjets use a halftone screen. If that is so, I have news for
you.
Okay, I'll bite. What printer do you have, and what is the issue
A scroll of mail from Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 12 Nov 2001
19:50:57 +
Read it? y
These days it's more to do with what you're weened with, computer-wise.
If you grow up with PCs, you tend to stay with them.
I've found that people who are weaned with only PCs tend to be very
wary of
.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
On Monday, November 12, 2001, at 03:08 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
it's called Postscript
On Tuesday, November 13, 2001, at 06:43 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
That's funny, when I told my graphics software I wanted to change the
printer halftone, it told me that requires a Postscript printer.
Once again, I'm talking about photographic printing here.
-Aaron
-
This message is from
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Ha ha! I'd probably be running Linux if I didn't need all the stinking
MS
Office applications to be compatible with the rest of the world.
Photoshop is the other app I use primarily. Of course that's readily
available for the Mac.
So's MS Office. :)
Now
That makes two of us.
On Monday 12 November 2001 00:52, Doug Franklin wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:15:33 +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
I'm configuring a new installation on a 6Gb disk for that machine
at the moment because I haven't kept the old installation up to
date (and the drive that
On Monday, November 12, 2001, at 12:21 AM, David A. Mann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A $4,000 PC ~does~ exceed a $4,000 MAC.
Of course it does. A combination of economies of scale, and healthy
competition in the hardware sector.
One should not shop on price alone, however.
On Sunday, November 11, 2001, at 03:08 PM, aimcompute wrote:
Just curious, how compatible MS office applications are between Mac and
PC
and what kind of time lag there is between release of the Windows
version
and when a Mac version is released.
There are no compatibility issues between
In a message dated 11/12/01 10:18:36 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It all depends on what you're doing. For me, the Mac OS is the right
choice.
Anyone like yourself who deals with a ton of graphics or CAD work might very
well be better off with MAC/Apple. But your
It so happens Office and Photoshop, like malevolent viruses, have invaded
and
conquered PC computerdome-ask Apple/Mac folk if that isn't true?
Mafud,
This is entirely true. My sister's bloke (shoots wildlife with Canon and
Bronica) uses Photoshop an a PC and swears by it. In fact, most of
Just curious, how compatible MS office applications are between Mac and PC
and what kind of time lag there is between release of the Windows version
and when a Mac version is released.
Office 98 was released for the Mac well before the Windows version...
Signed,
A. Fanatic
-
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
On Monday, November 12, 2001, at 12:21 AM, David A. Mann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A $4,000 PC ~does~ exceed
was there an office 98?
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Just curious, how compatible MS office applications are between
is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Just curious, how compatible MS office
- Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
was there an office 98?
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Just curious
On Monday, November 12, 2001, at 03:08 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
it's called Postscript. Or the free version Ghostscript. And yes you
can use
a Postscript printer on a PC.
I was talking about ColorSync. Postscript is not particularly important
in photographic imaging.
-Aaron
-
This
On Monday, November 12, 2001, at 03:19 PM, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
I guess so! Since there never was an Office 98 for Windows. I suspect
that
Office 98 for Mac was the same as Office 97 for Windows. Which would
indicate that the run about a year behind.
I don't know if in this situation
On 12 Nov 2001, at 19:50, Cotty wrote:
These days it's more to do with what you're weened with, computer-wise.
If you grow up with PCs, you tend to stay with them. The 2 graphic
designers at our place grew up with PCs, and feel uneasy using the Mac.
But that's only because they're used to
In a message dated 11/12/01 2:52:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
People use the Mac because they *want* to. Most people use a PC because
they have to...
I actually bought a MAC back in 1989. Went back to PCs in a little over a
year, selling the MAC for a profit.
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
However for seasoned PC users there are now no real obstacles for using PC
in a photo-graphics environment and in fact I would say now maybe PC's
actually have the advantage over Macs (this is of course if they have been
From: Mafud
We're not disagreeing Bill.
I think I've died and gone to heavenVBG
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:15:33 +1300, David A. Mann wrote:
I'm configuring a new installation on a 6Gb disk for that machine at the
moment because I haven't kept the old installation up to date (and the drive that
holds my root partition has given a few errors).
I love Mandrake! :-)
TTYL,
At 11:36 10.11.2001 +1100, Kevin wrote:
Yes, Linux is good for the servers:
2:55pm up 102 days, 2:27, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
But there is not enough software available for workstations to
use Linux only.
I use Linux only. What is missing?
Most of the softwares I am
In a message dated 11/10/01 11:37:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj:Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Date:11/10/01 11:37:10 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (aimcompute)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: A HREF
In a message dated 11/10/01 1:25:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
. Another
words,
Windows, over time, degrades. No one knows why, and Microsoft prolly
ain't
gonna fix it.
Couldn't it simply be that operators, new and old, fearing the unknown,
refuse to or
.
Thanks,
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question...)
I had this same challenge a couple of years ago. I seem to
remember
finding
Actually Mafud,
I think Microsoft IS partly to blame. The fact is most people that have a
computer don't have it because they're computer buffs. They have it because
it's a tool that let 's accomplish a task. They have know desire to be
computer geeks.
Microsoft of course advertises to sell
David A. Mann wrote:
I wonder how much the stability problems depend on drivers, hardware etc.
The thing is, nobody knows. We've had a pile of anecdotal evidence
about
Windows the last 24 hours or so.
I've been programming PC's since before the original IBM-PC. The only
thing
my brain
cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
On Fri, 9 Nov
IMHO, ME`s downfall was not being able to recognize incompatible
programs. I was very happy with it till I installed Norton Utilities (worked
fine with 98SE), then the OS went downhill fast. Win2000 Advanced
Server is now my OS of choice.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
David A. Mann
At 08:20 9.11.2001 -0500, graywolf wrote:
This made me switch over to the Linux box and type 'uptime. 30 days, 2
hours, 5minutes.
--graywolf
Yes, Linux is good for the servers:
2:55pm up 102 days, 2:27, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
But there is not enough software available for
I got so frustrated yesterday that I broke down and got Norton Systemworks.
After putting it through its paces, so far everything is working normally.
Guess I had some conflicts somewhere that Systemworks was able to resolve.
I also picked up some cheap memory chips at Best Buy (I know, they may
Todd,
If you run Office or any other Microsoft apps, you may be using part
of IE already. Microsoft shares many dlls across their software. And
many other programs also take advantage of the Microsoft dlls.
Bruce
Friday, November 09, 2001, 11:05:18 AM, you wrote:
TS I recently had 19
Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:08 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
aimcompute,
I've been writing code for 20 years and have never encountered a
company requiring the code to be ineffecient
Then you need 98lite. It installs my 98SE without IE and all the other
junk that makes it slow and unstable. I normally use Linux, but also
dual boot to 98lite on the same box and both or rock solid. Find it at:
http://www.98lite.net/
On Friday 09 November 2001 13:05, Todd Stanley wrote:
! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
aimcompute,
I've been writing code for 20 years and have never encountered a
company requiring the code to be ineffecient. On the contrary,
programmers are quite capable, without being told, to write
ineffecient code. Most commonly are deadlines, which
]
To: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re[4]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Tom,
I think you give them too much credit. I don't think they really put
2+2 together (except for maybe Bill Gates). Pretty much schedule is
king
Top Ten Rejected Marketing Slogans for Windows XP:
10 Ooh, Look! It's Shiny!
9 Does a Little More, Sucks a Little Less
8 Now with Tailfins!
7 Anti-Trust-Free Since 2001
6 Screens of Death in All the Colors of the Rainbow!
5 Look, lemmings -- a Cliff!
4 Where Do You Want
computers using switches on the
front panel with only 64-bytes of memory)
---
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
l To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:04 AM
l Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
l question...)
I got so frustrated yesterday that I broke down and got Norton
l Systemworks.
After putting it through its paces, so far everything is
l
-
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lbparis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question...)
lbparis,
I would check into Partition Magic and see if that can
straighten
things out.
Bruce Dayton
LOve it!
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 D3 A OT: A computer question...)
Top Ten Rejected Marketing Slogans for Windows XP:
10 Ooh, Look! It's
|
\/ |
\ /---+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:56 PM
To: aimcompute
Subject: Re[6]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Tom,
The way
To: lbparis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:53 PM
l Subject: Re[2]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
l question...)
lbparis,
I would check into Partition Magic and see if that can
l straighten
things out.
Bruce Dayton
l -
l This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Brendan wrote:
Oh give up and get Linux, no more worries ever again
:)
I see Microsoft now wants hacking classes as an act
of terrorism
seems their security model relies more on legislation than
on security audits.
/shrug
Kevin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
David,
Yeah, if only Microsoft would make them fully backward compatible like
they tell everyone else to do. In the early Windows days (286 and
first 3.0) days, when memory was very expensive, dlls were quite handy and
I used and created them quite often. Nowadays, backward compability
and
Is there a Linux version of PhotoShop?
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question...)
I use Linux only. What is missing
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question...)
Brendan wrote:
Oh give up and get Linux, no more worries ever again
:)
I see Microsoft now wants hacking classes as an act
of terrorism
seems their security model relies more on legislation than
on security audits
Yes, its called Gimp...Graphic Image Manipulation Program. It comes
free on just about any Linux CD package.
On Friday 09 November 2001 19:48, lbparis wrote:
Is there a Linux version of PhotoShop?
Len
--
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:53 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer
question...)
lbparis,
I would check into Partition Magic and see if that can
straighten
things out.
Bruce Dayton
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Yes, its called Gimp...Graphic Image Manipulation Program. It comes
free on just about any Linux CD package.
On Friday 09 November 2001 19:48, lbparis wrote:
Is there a Linux version of PhotoShop?
Len
--
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
:47 PM
Subject: Re[4]: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Tom,
I think you give them too much credit. I don't think they really put
2+2 together (except for maybe Bill Gates). Pretty much schedule is
king. All else (quality and features) be compromised.
Bruce
enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
lbparis wrote:
Now, cheap hardware allows software companies to kludge
,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.
- Original Message -
From: Todd Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:09 PM
Subject: RE: Windows XP - Scary! (Was=3 A OT: A computer question...)
Really? I used to have some incredibly
P.S. What are the benefits of Win98 SE over the plain vanilla Win98?
I have heard it is more stable, faster, and offers the home-networking
option, enabling 'internet connection sharing'.
Frits Wüthrich
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
It is supposed to be the most stable one of the 98 series.
I doubt it.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
I do think that some MS software just does not perform as specified: for
example, Outlook continues to want to spell-check the text of the message
included in my replies, even though I have set this off. Nor will it
automatically check for new mail on the modem connection, although I know
it
Bill Owens writes:
Don't try it. ME is on this machine and is unstable as hell. Frequently
locks up for no apparent reason, won't close properly without turning power
off and just generally a real pain in the ass.
The only troubles I've had with ME so far is the occasional freeze-up
87 matches
Mail list logo
