AM
Subject: OT - So quiet in here
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you first started photography ;o)
just for fun
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED
Op Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:25:37 +0100 schreef Collin R Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you
On Mar 16, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
But know, out of curiosity, Godfrey, do you have a scan of some of
this prints that I could see? if not no problem, is just to satisfy
the curiosity of someone that have never shot BW film (and I don't
plan to, too lazy for that) and with
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/17 Fri AM 08:21:10 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - So quiet in here
Op Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:25:37 +0100 schreef Collin R Brendemuehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have
Op Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:06:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One other thing I notice: Old prints (say, beginning 20th century) often
do not have a full tonal range: There's black and dark grey, and a lot
of
white. The middle to light grays seem to have bleached away. I think
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/17 Fri AM 09:40:38 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - So quiet in here
Op Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:06:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One other thing I notice: Old prints (say, beginning 20th century
Op Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:18:54 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Along these lines: we strongly believe a dutch museum has 'glass
negatives' of the ship. Would that be worth pursueing? Can these
negatives
still be printed (or scanned)? What size would a 'glass negative' have?
As
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:06:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One other thing I notice: Old prints (say, beginning 20th century)
often
do not have a full tonal range: There's black and dark grey, and a
lot of
white. The middle to light grays seem to have
On 3/16/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't know what your missing. Shoot BW. Blood will flow like you
have never felt it.
Dave, listeining to Gentle Giant, Brooks
Well, the thing is that I know for sure I'll get hooked if I start
shooting BW, and then I'll have to scan, get
I'm definitely not one of the elderly members, but I am in training :-)
I scanned a heap of family photos for my father some time ago. Most
taken in the late 40's early 50's and I must say none of them looked
like that. Here's an example:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/DG_001.jpg
(My
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
On 3/16/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't know what your missing. Shoot BW. Blood will flow like you
have never felt it.
Dave, listeining to Gentle Giant, Brooks
Well, the thing is that I know for sure I'll get hooked if I start
shooting BW,
The image titled 'Detemined' on this page is a copy of an 11x14 that has
spent many years on my walls. It is about 40 years old and still looks fine.
Taken with Pentax S1a and Soligor 200mm lens on Tri-X.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/oly.htm
Powell
At 12:27 AM 17/03/2006 , you wrote:
On
Who does shoot and scan BW, pretty much exclusively these days.
I know you do, Adam, and I like the results (always checking your
flickr acount ;-) )
On 3/17/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
On 3/16/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't
No, no, if you shoot BW you make a great darkroom print then scan that
for web images. If you are going to scan the negative and make digital
prints you lose the benefits of the analog process and might as well
start with a digital image in the first place.
graywolf
Except for the fact that scanning the neg and editing typically gives
FAR better results than scanning a print. Prints typically result in
somewhat poor images without much work.
But I print digitally too. A nice matte fibre print is much less hassle
that way (cheaper too). No 1hr washes.
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you first started photography ;o)
just for fun
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/111765427/
On 16/3/06, Fernando Terrazzino, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have the feeling that today's activity dropped a notch (march
break?) so I thought about asking to the eldery members if this effect
makes photos look like when you first started photography ;o)
just for fun
No. They look oversharpened and overly yellow to me. When I started
doing photography (42 years ago), panchromatic Tri-X was available as
was neutral-black Kodabromide paper and Dektol paper developer. I
still have some of those prints and they don't look anything like
this, although some
Well, I was bored playing with PS (obviusly) and I sent this for 2 reasons:
1) I was bored at work (don't tell my boss)
2) wanted to see who classified himself/herself as the (gonna change
to more respectful adjective here) experienced with longer time
living to have a chance to see changes into
Quoting Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
is just to satisfy
the curiosity of someone that have never shot BW film (and I don't
plan to, too lazy for that)
You don't know what your missing. Shoot BW. Blood will flow like you
have never felt it.
Dave, listeining to Gentle Giant, Brooks
20 matches
Mail list logo
