Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-11 Thread Anders Hultman
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, John Francis wrote: That suggests 2048-bit keys should be secure for maybe the next 20 years. Adding two bits per year to the key length should more than keep up with the increases in processor speed, if you're really being paranoid. Still, this whole discussion is based

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-11 Thread Steve Jolly
Gonz wrote: I guess if youre really paranoid, 2048 bits might be taking a risk at some point. But I'm truly skeptical. 10^12 is a big factor. I suspect that most of our computational performance is now going to come from massive parallelism, and not processor frequency. We still have a

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-11 Thread Cotty
Just ask Deep Thought. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-11 Thread Graywolf
Actually the quantum computer gives you the answer before you key in the question. Then you have to figure out what question you are supposed to ask, because if you do not ask it the universe quietly disappears around you. -- Steve Jolly wrote: Or alternatively wait for quantum computers to be

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-11 Thread Jostein
Um... What's six multiplied by... ahem nevermind. Jostein - Original Message - From: Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:12 PM Subject: Re: OT - Supercomputers Actually the quantum computer gives you the answer before you key

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-10 Thread Gonz
Just sit back and enjoy the security. That little 36.1 Tera-FLOP is just a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of power it would take to crack the 2048 code, much less the 4096 one. 36.1 Tera-FLOPS is 36.1 x 10^15 flops. If you remember that post before, if each quark in the universe

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-10 Thread John Francis
Gonz mused: Just sit back and enjoy the security. That little 36.1 Tera-FLOP is just a drop in the bucket compared to the amount of power it would take to crack the 2048 code, much less the 4096 one. 36.1 Tera-FLOPS is 36.1 x 10^15 flops. If you remember that post before, if each

Re: OT - Supercomputers

2004-10-10 Thread Gonz
I guess if youre really paranoid, 2048 bits might be taking a risk at some point. But I'm truly skeptical. 10^12 is a big factor. I suspect that most of our computational performance is now going to come from massive parallelism, and not processor frequency. We still have a little room in