On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:06 PM, William Robb wrote:
I'm waiting for some smart person to argue that there are too many laws to
reasonably be expected to know, and that ignorance of at least some of the
more obscure laws probably is an excuse.
I saw a quote ages ago...
If one would give me
It's a secret list. Much easier to levy fines when the public is
ignorant of the law, and ignorance of the law is no excuse...
On 6/23/2012 4:13 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if
That's strictly true. Congress shall make no law... Until the 14th
amendment there was no specific passage in The Constitution to keep
States from violating their citizens natural rights that were Guaranteed
by the Federal Constitution. It was generally assumed that they
wouldn't dare. That
On Jun 24, 2012, at 05:44 , John Sessoms wrote:
The government is not allowed to establish religion.
Didn't they form the Republican Party?
Or was that Wall Street?
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
“ Nature is considerably more creative and inventive than humankind. Without
Nature
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:44 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
If the
government defines profane, that by extension defines sacred. The government
is not allowed to establish religion.
I have no opinion on the law, however your first sentence there is
illogical (on multiple
On 26/06/2012 11:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
It's a secret list. Much easier to levy fines when the public is
ignorant of the law, and ignorance of the law is no excuse...
I'm waiting for some smart person to argue that there are too many laws
to reasonably be expected to know, and that
I favor fewer laws. Vague is good. I only have to think Should I be doin'
this? to keep from screwing up.
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, Louisiana
USA
On Jun 26, 2012, at 19:06, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/06/2012 11:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
From: William Robb
On 26/06/2012 11:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
It's a secret list. Much easier to levy fines when the public is
ignorant of the law, and ignorance of the law is no excuse...
I'm waiting for some smart person to argue that there are too many laws
to reasonably be expected to
Quoting Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
Sat Jun 23 18:11:04 EDT 2012
Brian Walters wrote:
Interesting.
Would that decision stand up to a court challenge as violating the
First Amendment?
Just wondering - I'm anything but an expert on the US Constitution.
All I know about it is what I've
From: Igor Roshchin
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/massachusetts-town-puts-20-fine-on-profanity/
The menu... err. list of the
From: Brian Walters
Quoting Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
It's more of a public nuisance/disturbing the peace ordinance. They
already have a law on the books that prohibits cursing in public, but
they can't (and never have) enforce it due to First Amendment
protections.
It's just another example of charge stacking where they'll throw
several related
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/massachusetts-town-puts-20-fine-on-profanity/
The menu... err. list of the forbidden words is
Quoting Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/12/massachusetts-town-puts-20-fine-on-profanity/
The
I have heard the news, Middleboro being in our neck of the woods...
Shall I take a drive over there test your query? Will the pdml post
bail if I am arrested...?
:)
-c
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in
Mbuttachusetts???
lol. That's a new one on me...
:)
-c
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
Mbuttachusetts???
lol. That's a new one on me...
Taxachusetts would probably get you a $20 fine.
--
Scott Loveless
Camp Hill, PA USA
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
__o
_'\,_
(*)/ (*)
--
PDML
Sat Jun 23 18:11:04 EDT 2012
Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Igor Roshchin str at komkon.org:
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am not there, but who knows if they screen PDML],
you can be fined $20:
without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
Sent: June 23, 2012 6/23/12
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: OT - don't @#$%% in Middleborough, Mbuttachusetts
If you haven't heard this news yet, - if you swear in Middleborough,
in Mbuttachusetts [I am
19 matches
Mail list logo
