On 12/20/2010 7:30 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I'd guess that it should have similar DoF to a 50/2
DOF at f.95 what DOF?
Right, at f.95. Obviously, my definition is imprecise and I used the
word similar to express that. DOF at any given aperture does not
depend on the size of the sensor to
f0.95. If you gottem, use em, I say
On 16/12/2010 7:23 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
f0.95?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Derby Changder...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 16/12/2010 12:16 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I've been really curious about this lens since I saw it on the
43rumors
On 12/15/2010 3:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
So, without disrespect, Derby, I am thinking that you've just started on a
fascinating path of hair thin DOF photography.
I'd guess that it should have similar DoF to a 50/2
DOF at f.95 what DOF?
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_12/10_12_lo_hol/01.htm
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
I've been really curious about this lens since I saw it on the
43rumors site. What's the exposure info on this shot? It looks a
little soft in the handheld fashion, but that works for this shot.
For all I know, you took it in the dark.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Derby Chang
Yeah, right. Well, I've read the review of this lens on LensTip. Right
here:
http://www.lenstip.com/1876-news-Voigtlander_Nokton_25_mm_f_0.95_-_lens_review.html
It's a cool lens, but from my experience with A 50/1.2, it still seems
to me that something in the frame has to be sharper than the
Very nice, Derby! The bright light in the mirror bothers me a bit,
but it may make the shot for others.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_12/10_12_lo_hol/01.htm
On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
So, without disrespect, Derby, I am thinking that you've just started on a
fascinating path of hair thin DOF photography.
I'd guess that it should have similar DoF to a 50/2
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
On 16/12/2010 12:16 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I've been really curious about this lens since I saw it on the
43rumors site. What's the exposure info on this shot? It looks a
little soft in the handheld fashion, but that works for this shot.
For all I know, you took it in the dark.
On Wed,
f0.95?
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 16/12/2010 12:16 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I've been really curious about this lens since I saw it on the
43rumors site. What's the exposure info on this shot? It looks a
little soft in the handheld
10 matches
Mail list logo
