frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:58:22 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
The explanation makes
So... uh... where are the brakes? And the kickstand? ;)
Chris
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:57:45 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll say more about it later, but I will say that's my Rossin Track
Bike in the foreground. Comments are always welcome:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
Pat White
On 11/11/04, Pat White, discombobulated, unleashed:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
:-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 23:31:27 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't need a seat either or so I gather
They're calling me Falsetto Frank nowadays...
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:52:12 -0800, Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank's bike don't need no steenkeeng brakes! Looks like it's got none.
Nice bike, I bet it's very light.
Pat White
Thanks Pat (and Chris, too). Whenever anyone asks where the brakes
are, I slap my thighs real loud
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:09:25 -0800, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The explanation makes the photo, in truth.
I know there's a lot of commentary to the contrary, but there simply are
some photos that benefit from a little help.
I was going to mention the explanation at the first
I'll say more about it later, but I will say that's my Rossin Track
Bike in the foreground. Comments are always welcome:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2870605
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Ok, you have lost me with the title. The image seems a bit busy to
me, but again, I'm not quite sure what I am looking at based on the
title. Appears to be a snap of two riders taking a break. You're
going to have to fill me in just a bit more.
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 3:57:45 PM,
Hi Frank ...
I'll agree with Bruce about the business. That the one fellow has his head
down doesn't add anything to the pic, and may well detract from it. Far
from one of your best ... sorry can't muster any enthusiasm for this
one.
Shel
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:07:44 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, you have lost me with the title. The image seems a bit busy to
me, but again, I'm not quite sure what I am looking at based on the
title. Appears to be a snap of two riders taking a break. You're
going to have to
Then, as it stands, it doesn't speak to me - not being much of a
rider. More like a Shel Happy Snap type of image. Goodness knows,
I have a ton of them myself.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 6:16:33 PM, you wrote:
ft On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:07:44 -0800, Bruce Dayton
ft
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 18:23:32 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then, as it stands, it doesn't speak to me - not being much of a
rider. More like a Shel Happy Snap type of image. Goodness knows,
I have a ton of them myself.
Well, if I tell you about the title, I'm sure the photo
i find this photo much more enjoyable now that I know what clear at
the can means. Sometimes words and photos work together to tell a
better story than either can relate on their own. This is one of those
times. Thanks for explaining this scenario. In that context, I find it
very interesting.
I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
Bruce
Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 7:34:56 PM, you wrote:
PS i find this photo much more enjoyable now that I know
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 19:58:22 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to agree. Even though you didn't think it would make any
difference, Frank, the explanation does bring more meaning and
interest into the photo. Thanks for sharing it.
Well, I'm glad. Thanks both Paul and
16 matches
Mail list logo
