Boris said!
Thanks for sharing Dave. My knowledge about IR photography is zilch. I
only know that such thing exists.
However, the branches on the right cross into the building. They are on
the foreground so it looks (to me at least) that they overcome
Thanks for the comments.
I was planning to take some BW shots of it as well,now that the roll of colour is out
of
the 6x7.:-)
I'll try it with out the branches.I think Shel mentioned that as well. I thought that
might add some
framing to it,but it seems not.
Its not far from work,so its no big
First, I like what you've tried to do,
juxtaposing the old
relic with the
new office building. From there the photo goes rapidly downhill. The
tonality for BW is terrible, the image is flat, not particularly sharp
(and, in this case, that's a
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/relic-1.jpg
I'm thinking of using this for my Fair picture this year in the Relics of Yesteryear
catagory.(Unless i
get a good one from the Ressor 200 year family reunion next weekend).:-)
For the
First, I like what you've tried to do, juxtaposing the old relic with the
new office building. From there the photo goes rapidly downhill. The
tonality for BW is terrible, the image is flat, not particularly sharp
(and, in this case, that's a detriment), lacking in detail, and poorly
composed.
Kind of characteristic of Infra-Red film, Shel.
--
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
First, I like what you've tried to do, juxtaposing the old relic with the
new office building. From there the photo goes rapidly downhill. The
tonality for BW is terrible, the image is flat, not particularly sharp
(and, in
First, I like what you tried to do here. The main comp is ok, as a
concept. But the branches are a distraction though, and it would have
been nicer in plain BW film instead of IR, IMHO. This would have
allowed a darker sky, maybe?, with filters I suppose. The sky is too
close to the color
7 matches
Mail list logo
