Nice of you, Paul in MKE!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Paul in MKE wrote:
>
> Very nice...
>
> -p
>
>
>> On 7/27/2017 1:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Shot this past early spring. Colusa Ntl Preserve.
>>
>> C?
>> Thanks!
>>
>> J
>>
>>
Very nice...
-p
On 7/27/2017 1:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Shot this past early spring. Colusa Ntl Preserve.
C?
Thanks!
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18410726
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Satisfying to hear, Ken.
Appreciated!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> Nice capture Jack.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>> From: Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net
>> Subject: Peso-Gr
Really appreciated, Paul. Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 1:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Crisp, colorful and interesting.
>
>
> Paul
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Dan.
>>
>> J
>>
>> Sent
Crisp, colorful and interesting.
Paul
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Thanks, Dan.
>
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>
>> I like the way his eye stands out, and the
Nice capture Jack.
-Original Message-
>From: Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net
>Subject: Peso-Grackle and Driftwood
>
>
>
>Shot this past early spring. Colusa Ntl Preserve.
>
>C?
>Thanks!
>
>J
>
>https://www.photo.net/photo/18410726
--
PDML P
Thanks, Dan.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I like the way his eye stands out, and the patterns in the water.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:37 PM,
I like the way his eye stands out, and the patterns in the water.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Shot this past early spring. Colusa Ntl Preserve.
>
> C?
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
>
Shot this past early spring. Colusa Ntl Preserve.
C?
Thanks!
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18410726
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 5/3/07, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I mean, though
there is some visible noise on the shot too)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78138346
Shot in jpeg, my mistake I thought I'd changed the settings on the
camera to PEF
different from
what I captured - I was also shooting birds.
I've only shot a few hundred images with my K10D, and am satisfied with the
AWB so far.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: Grackle
On 5/3/07, wendy beard [EMAIL
Strange what you say, Wendy. I for one find K10D's light balance to be
much more to my liking than it was with *istD. These days I apply this
kind of correction extremely rarely.
However, I admit that I like warmer light. Thus, I should say that the
original warmer version of the picture I
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I mean, though
there is some visible noise on the shot too)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78138346
Shot in jpeg, my mistake I thought I'd changed the settings on the
camera to PEF after I downloaded the update to C1-LE.
I find that AWB
Wow! Like this catch and you really caught the Grackle personality.
Lens performance is impressive at 500mm.
Believe I prefer the warmer version.
Jack
--- wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I mean, though
there is some visible noise on the
Nice Wendy.
I thing the cooler shot brings out the back gound, and the bird looks
less saturated to me.
Lens looks li,e it does adecent job.
Dave
On 5/3/07, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I mean, though
there is some visible noise on
Ditto, really great catch!!!
also like the warmer version better.
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/
On 5/3/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Like this catch and you really caught the Grackle personality.
Lens performance is impressive at 500mm.
Believe I prefer the
In a message dated 5/3/2007 6:45:56 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I mean, though
there is some visible noise on the shot too)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78138346
Shot in jpeg, my mistake I thought I'd
Nice shot. It makes the dirty bird look respectable. I personally prefer
the orange quality of the light in the first one.
Tom C.
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Grackle
Date: Thu
Great shot. I prefer the cooler version.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of wendy beard
Sent: 03 May 2007 14:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Grackle
Quite pretty things really. Noisy though. (the bird I
Nice shot. But that is a nasty ugly bird! I feel about them the way
some here feel about the Canada Geese and the Cormorants. The
Grackles mob my bird feeders, chasing away all the song birds and
woodpeckers...
stan
On May 3, 2007, at 8:34 AM, wendy beard wrote:
Quite pretty things
20 matches
Mail list logo