On 20/10/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/10/17/g20-toronto-cop-who.html
(Can someone in Canada keep an eye out if Officer Bubbles gets anywhere
with his lawsuit?)
what a twat.
That's being very unkind to twats.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 20/10/2010 3:48 AM, Bob W wrote:
G'day all
I came across the following article on yet more photography bans:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/photography-bans-
leave-ordinary-life-out-of-the-picture-20101017-16p0v.html
http://tinyurl.com/2a6j9te
they've got this sort of
All very true. And if the authorities were really concerned about
commercial
photography profiting from public land, they would ask for a percentage,
rather than just a peppercorn flat fee to apply for a permit (around $30 a
day), not that I would want that to happen. It is obviously just an
--
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: PESO - Beating a Photography Ban
(Can someone in Canada keep an eye out if Officer Bubbles gets anywhere
with his lawsuit?)
what a twat.
We like our cops that way.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
they've got this sort of thing arse about face. If we accept, for the sake
of argument, that people should not be able to make money out of photographs
of their own public land without a permit (and I for one do not accept
On 10/20/2010 2:40 PM, William Robb wrote:
--
From: Bob W Subject: RE: PESO - Beating a Photography Ban
(Can someone in Canada keep an eye out if Officer Bubbles gets anywhere
with his lawsuit?)
what a twat.
We like our cops that way
--
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: PESO - Beating a Photography Ban
The girl was being a twit, the cop was being an ass. She went to jail and
I doubt it got further than the prosecutor's desk, who, rolling his/her
eyes with a pained expression
G'day all
I came across the following article on yet more photography bans:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/photography-bans-leave-ordinary-life-out-of-the-picture-20101017-16p0v.html
http://tinyurl.com/2a6j9te
This one caught my eye for two reasons. First, it talks about a
Brian,
That's a lovely picture of a place I've never seen before!
Thanks for showing it.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G'day all
I came across the following article on yet more photography bans:
On 19/10/10, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
This one caught my eye for two reasons. First, it talks about a ban on
photography at Victoria's Cape Schanck, a spectacular area on the
southern tip of Victoria's Mornington Peninsula. As it happens, I was
there last week - hence the
G'day all
I came across the following article on yet more photography bans:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/photography-bans-
leave-ordinary-life-out-of-the-picture-20101017-16p0v.html
http://tinyurl.com/2a6j9te
they've got this sort of thing arse about face. If we
11 matches
Mail list logo
