Reluctantly, i will show this to the SO tonight.
I feel our three cats will be four when i do.:-)
Nice shot, and very crisp i might add.
Dave
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
In a message dated 7/7/2006 10:19:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
Shel
Don't much like cat photos, but that's nice. Because it's different.
Marnie aka Doe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:40:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is why I am killfiled.
Shel is quite happy to post a pic, but the moment someone suggests an
alternative preference, he gets goes defensive and woe betide if you
don't see things His Way.
His
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: 7/8/2006 11:32:29 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Brothers
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:40:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is why I am killfiled.
Shel is quite happy to post a pic, but the moment someone suggests an
alternative
My apologies to the list. This was to be sent privately to Cotty ... sorry
you had to see it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're so full of shit Cotty it's running out your ears.
{snip}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I don't see it as a cat photo, but rather as a photo in which there are
cats.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
Don't much like cat photos, but that's nice. Because it's different.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 9/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
You're so full of shit Cotty it's running out your ears.
Gotcha.
Job done.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 9/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Really? Killfiled? But you are a harmless twit, oops, wit.
Mostly harmless ;-))
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 9/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
My apologies to the list. This was to be sent privately to Cotty ... sorry
you had to see it.
I'm not sorry at all (for once).
I'm also not as full of shit as you think I am, old chap.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/7/2006 11:40:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is why I am killfiled.
Shel is quite happy to post a pic, but the moment someone suggests an
alternative preference, he gets goes defensive and woe betide if you
don't see
On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
No Paul, there's not a lot of empty space on top. Their ID and information
papers take up some of the top part of the frame, which is, imo as the
photographer, is an important part of their story. Otherwise they're just
a couple of cats in
On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
What you can see tells you what you need to know.
Arrogant bollocks!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I didn't look at the photo, so I can't comment on it.
But I do get bothered by people telling me what they think I need
to know.
Keith McG
Cotty wrote:
On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
What you can see tells you what you need to know.
Arrogant bollocks!!!
--
It was a cat photo; that's enough for me!
I think all pet photos should carry a warning in the subject
line: [pet].
That way I could bin them more easily!
I have no doubt that some of them are excellent photos but they
simply do not interest me.
Keith McG
Cotty wrote:
On 7/7/06, Shel
On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
I usually don't look at these kinds of pictures very deeply. Not that
I dislike pets or cats or dogs, only that such photos of people's
pets only occasionally do much for me.
I'll play with the crop some more. Your suggestion seems a little tight
for me, but I can see that it can definitely benefit from some tightening
up. Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
I usually don't look at these
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
I don't know really why but words Arrested Development just popped in
my mind...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nice shot. I tend to avoid cat pictures, with the exception of Kyle
Cassidy's work, but this is a great shot.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
DS w/K24/2.8
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 7/7/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/brothers.html
Literally brought a tear to my eye Shel. Poor little guys. I want to
go home and give Patches (my 16 year old kitten) a hug right now.
Beautifully composed and framed. Perfect dof. Your
Thanks, Frank ... I was only able to grab a few shots of the adoption room
yesterday as I was there with a friend who was picking up a foster cat, and
she had to zip in and zip out. I wasn't going to keep her company as I'm
usually upset by seeing things like this, but I'm glad I did. If I
Shel,
I'm not much into cat photos, but I have to say, this one is
wonderful. I think the reason it works so well for me, is that it is
not just a picture of a pretty cat, but more of a statement and story.
The technical quality is great as always, and is making me want to get
one of those K
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your comments. I don't really see this as a cat photo so much
as a photo in which there are cats. Perhaps that's splitting hares.
I'm thinking that I'd like to go back to the SPCA and perhaps do a series
on these creatures, but their situation tears at my heart ... still
Shel,
I'm late jumping in, but I'd like to say that I find the Brothers are
a tough pair to forget. Their proximity to each other, in their
predicament, along with the almost certain pending separation facing
them, is an emotional grabber.
Nicely timed and composed moment.
Jack
--- Shel
I would like to see this framed down quite a bit. There's a lot of
empty space at the top, and the cats legs are cut off. I think this
would be much more effective if the frame were filled with the two
cats. But it's a good moment and a worthy photo.
Paul
On Jul 7, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Jack
I don't know if it's would have been possible, but I would have liked
to seen this framed in the portrait orientation.
With the shot as taken, the image of those cute, but sad looking, fur
balls and the inclusion of the Animal ID tag has me wishing I could
read more of it know more about them.
can see tells you what you need to know.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 7/7/2006 8:24:45 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Brothers
I would like to see this framed down quite a bit. There's a lot of
empty space
If the photo was taken in portrait orientation most of the paperwork would
be lost, as would some details of what's in the cage, but then you'd have
more to complain about ;-)) Hmmm ... maybe that's a fair trade off LOL
What more do you need to know? The basic info is there for you.
Thanks
On 7/8/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the photo was taken in portrait orientation most of the paperwork would
be lost, as would some details of what's in the cage, but then you'd have
more to complain about ;-)) Hmmm ... maybe that's a fair trade off LOL
As I said I didn't
29 matches
Mail list logo
