Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold
In a message dated 4/24/2007 9:05:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
Boris
===
I quite like it too, Boris, so you're not alone :-)
Wendy
On 4/24/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fascinating. I read just a few of the comments and they seem negative.
Me is totally different story. I really *like* this photo. I cannot say
why really. I just feel captivated.
I like the textures, the cobweb and the conversion. I like it all,
the lines did not lead my eyes off into nothing until I read some of
the other comments. In short... it works for me :)
Russ
On 4/24/07, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I quite like it too, Boris, so you're not alone :-)
In a message dated 4/24/2007 1:08:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like the textures, the cobweb and the conversion. I like it all,
the lines did not lead my eyes off into nothing until I read some of
the other comments. In short... it works for me :)
Russ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold rush) on list about a month to two months ago. Here is another shot of
the
same subject. I played with it a bit.
So what do you think? Does it work?
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold rush) on list about a month to two months ago. Here is another shot of
the
same subject. I played with it a bit.
So what do you think? Does it work?
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/homestead2.htm
of the
window.
It might like it better once I get my high-def monitor though.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Homestead #2
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:50:02 EDT
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's
Yes, it works. But I'd like it more as part of a group. It leaves me hungry to
see more of this place. I think I felt the same way about the first pic.
Perhaps they belong in a mini gallery presentation?
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mm. This one doesn't work for me either, Marnie. The composition
draws me off to the left looking for something and then I fall off
the edge of the wood into blurry nothing.
G
On Apr 20, 2007, at 11:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's
In a message dated 4/20/2007 1:03:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mm. This one doesn't work for me either, Marnie. The composition
draws me off to the left looking for something and then I fall off
the edge of the wood into blurry nothing.
G
=
I thought
In a message dated 4/20/2007 12:53:08 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, it works. But I'd like it more as part of a group. It leaves me hungry
to see more of this place. I think I felt the same way about the first pic.
Perhaps they belong in a mini gallery
Nice textures could use a little more tonal range.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold rush) on list about a month to two months ago. Here is another shot of
the
same subject. I played with it a bit.
So what do you
I get this texture thing, Marnie. I, also, feel that the image
doesn't provide enough total information. OTOH, if you got right down
into the texture/grain some interesting and complete compositions might
be had.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it works. But I'd like it more as part of a
In a message dated 4/20/2007 1:33:53 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get this texture thing, Marnie. I, also, feel that the image
doesn't provide enough total information. OTOH, if you got right down
into the texture/grain some interesting and complete compositions
On 4/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice textures could use a little more tonal range.
I agree with Peter. I was looking for someone to describe it for me ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead (California
gold rush) on
Hi Marnie
I quite like this except that there is insufficient contrast on the left edge
between the building and the background. Perhaps some masking to selectivly
lighten the background?
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting
In a message dated 4/20/2007 2:52:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice textures could use a little more tonal range.
I agree with Peter. I was looking for someone to describe it for me ;-)
=
Okay, I'll work
Pretty good, but the timbers to the left of the window appear out of focus -
should have used a smaller aperture, probably.
Maris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recap: I showed the side of my great grandfather's homestead
(California
gold rush) on list about a month to two months ago. Here is
In a message dated 4/20/2007 6:04:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pretty good, but the timbers to the left of the window appear out of focus -
should have used a smaller aperture, probably.
Maris
===
Thanks, I may post a smaller crop.
Marnie aka Doe
20 matches
Mail list logo
