Re: PESO - Log Wall Abstract

.@comcast.net> Subject: Re: PESO - Log Wall Abstract Well balanced scene although a think you would agree, looks a bit contrived. I know, hard to resist. :-) J Sent from my iPhone On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: This wall was on the same building as

Re: PESO - Log Wall Abstract

Well balanced scene although a think you would agree, looks a bit contrived. I know, hard to resist. :-) J Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 26, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ken Waller wrote: > > This wall was on the same building as the bottle wall PESO I posted recently. > > K-3,

PESO - Log Wall Abstract

This wall was on the same building as the bottle wall PESO I posted recently. K-3, 28-80 SMC F 3.5-4.5 - 1/25 @ f8, 200ISO https://www.photo.net/photo/18410489/Log-Wall-Abstract Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: OT Peso Log and look

On 14/9/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/20792566713/in/dateposted-public/ > >One of my test shots from the X30, taken at our local art gallery Sunday There'll be no stopping you now! Good job Dave. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__

Re: OT Peso Log and look

Clean detail on the log with the exception of the over exposed top. Certainly due to overhead lighting. J - Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" <pentko...@gmail.com> To: "Pentax Discuss" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:18:22

Re: OT Peso Log and look

no stopping is my middle name.:-) Dave On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 14/9/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/20792566713/in/dateposted-public/ >> >>One of my test shots from the X30, taken

Re: OT Peso Log and look

> From: "David J Brooks" <pentko...@gmail.com> > To: "Pentax Discuss" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:18:22 AM > Subject: OT Peso Log and look > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/20792566713/in/dateposted-public/ &g

OT Peso Log and look

https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/20792566713/in/dateposted-public/ One of my test shots from the X30, taken at our local art gallery Sunday Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML

Re: OT Peso Log and look

Looks like some vignetting in the LH corners. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" <pentko...@gmail.com> Subject: OT Peso Log and look https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/20792566713/in/datepos

Re: OT Peso Log and look

On 14/9/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed: >Looks like some vignetting in the LH corners. Interesting. I haven't noticed my camera (same lens) vignetting so much. It could be a combination of vignetting and incidental shadowing due to ambient lighting... Tests would be good. --

Re: OT Peso Log and look

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 14/9/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Looks like some vignetting in the LH corners. > > Interesting. I haven't noticed my camera (same lens) vignetting so much. > It could be a combination of vignetting

Re: PESO: Log Cabin

That's nice, hadn't seen it before. Unusual angle, interesting shot. Marnie aka Doe :-) == Thanks Frank. The light was particularly good that day. Cheers, Dave On 10/3/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/3/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day all,

Re: PESO: Log Cabin

Thanks Frank. The light was particularly good that day. Cheers, Dave On 10/3/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/3/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day all, I took this one during my OS holiday (~120kb):

PESO: Log Cabin

G'day all, I took this one during my OS holiday (~120kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP5072.jpg K10D, DA 16-45mm f4 @ 40mm, f4 @ 1/1600, ISO 100 As always any all comments welcome. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Log Cabin

On 10/3/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day all, I took this one during my OS holiday (~120kb): http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP5072.jpg K10D, DA 16-45mm f4 @ 40mm, f4 @ 1/1600, ISO 100 As always any all comments welcome. The light makes it. I like it

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

I looked at these out of order - and my reaction to #2 was that the foreground was too bare. So, you can guess how I feel about number #1. It may not be possible but if you could get up close the the log and use a wider angle it might be a more interesting shot. I like the concept here but

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/7/2007 9:50:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, theoretically it is indeed an improvement. But I have both opened and when I swap between them all I have to say is Bad Marnie, Bad, bad Marnie ;-). Boris === ROLF. Marnie aka the Bad

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

Actually, there should have been a smily at the end. Sorry Dave On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: but. Is this still a photograph. Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter.

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/8/2007 5:16:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, there should have been a smily at the end. Sorry Dave === Nevermind. Mine had a smiley. Marnie aka Doe :-) - Warning: I am now

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a new one. With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/7/2007 12:49:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It ~does~ look nicer than the original. I'll keep my thoughts to myself about cloning and the like. Aesthetically, it's an improvement, though... ;-) cheers, Thanks, frank. And you

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

7:38 PM Subject: PESO - Log Revisited Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a new one. With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak tree up

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/7/2007 3:49:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've read about them, I have seen pictures of thing looking like them, but this is the first time I've actually photographic evidense of an ent. BTW. Like the new version Tim Typo Mostly Harmless

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

Well, theoretically it is indeed an improvement. But I have both opened and when I swap between them all I have to say is Bad Marnie, Bad, bad Marnie ;-). Boris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no

PESO - Log Revisited

Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a new one. With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak tree up and moved it about 20-30 feet into the frame, where

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

I much prefer the re-do with the tree. I'd like both versions a little better if the stack peeking over the hill to the left were moved about 30 yards down the hill..or at least out of sight. :) Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

Yes - much better since you moved the Oak tree. Maris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a new one. With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

That is much improved. :-) G On May 6, 2007, at 10:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a new one. With a lot of time and trouble to

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

but. Is this still a photograph. Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter. Is it making the point to your obvious lovely work forum. Not sure removing large objects helps for what your trying to do. As you see. i have a bit of a kerfuffle with this. Dave On 5/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: but. Is this still a photograph. Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter. Is it making the point to your obvious lovely work forum. Not sure removing large objects helps for what your trying to

Re: PESO - Log Revisited

In a message dated 5/6/2007 11:55:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I much prefer the re-do with the tree. I'd like both versions a little better if the stack peeking over the hill to the left were moved about 30 yards down the hill..or at least out of sight. :) Jack

Re: PESO - Log

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/05/01 Tue AM 02:09:49 GMT To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Log Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series mentioned previously. http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/log.htm Comments welcome. I'm spotting

Re: PESO - Log

In a message dated 5/1/2007 3:07:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm spotting a theme here - but maybe not the one you want. Do you have non-hazy days in California? Or is it possible to get to a site when there is little, if any, background haze? I think the

Re: PESO - Log

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007/05/01 Tue PM 01:38:24 GMT To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: PESO - Log In a message dated 5/1/2007 3:07:25 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm spotting a theme here - but maybe not the one you want. Do you have non-hazy days

Re: PESO - Log

In a message dated 5/1/2007 7:19:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The haze is OK but, for me, it reduces the contrast between the different subjects. Not only in the literal sense. The common conception for this type of shot is for it to be rather dramatic - are

Re: PESO - Log

On Apr 30, 2007, at 7:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series mentioned previously. http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/log.htm I like the concept, Marnie, but the log is such a tiny piece of this frame that it's hard

Re: PESO - Log

In a message dated 5/1/2007 12:45:45 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Apr 30, 2007, at 7:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series mentioned previously.

Re: PESO - Log

On 5/1/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like the concept, Marnie, but the log is such a tiny piece of this frame that it's hard to draw out the contrast/context. Agreed. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

PESO - Log

Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series mentioned previously. http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/log.htm Comments welcome. Marnie aka Doe - Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.

Re: PESO - Log

Both shots are very good - I especially like the rail in Wet Lands 'cutting' the image into portions. Maris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another in the environmental landscape (landscape in context) series mentioned previously. http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/log.htm Comments

Re: PESO - Log

In a message dated 4/30/2007 7:32:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Both shots are very good - I especially like the rail in Wet Lands 'cutting' the image into portions. Maris === Thanks, Maris. Marnie aka Doe bg