I looked at these out of order - and my reaction to #2 was that the
foreground was too bare. So, you can guess how I feel about number #1.
It may not be possible but if you could get up close the the log and use
a wider angle it might be a more interesting shot. I like the concept
here but
In a message dated 5/7/2007 9:50:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, theoretically it is indeed an improvement. But I have both opened
and when I swap between them all I have to say is Bad Marnie, Bad, bad
Marnie ;-).
Boris
===
ROLF.
Marnie aka the Bad
Actually, there should have been a smily at the end.
Sorry
Dave
On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but.
Is this still a photograph.
Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter.
In a message dated 5/8/2007 5:16:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, there should have been a smily at the end.
Sorry
Dave
===
Nevermind. Mine had a smiley.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now
On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then
I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't
a
new one.
With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak
In a message dated 5/7/2007 12:49:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It ~does~ look nicer than the original. I'll keep my thoughts to
myself about cloning and the like.
Aesthetically, it's an improvement, though...
;-)
cheers,
Thanks, frank. And you
7:38 PM
Subject: PESO - Log Revisited
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then
I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this
isn't a
new one.
With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak tree
up
In a message dated 5/7/2007 3:49:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've read about them, I have seen pictures of thing looking like them, but
this is the first time I've actually photographic evidense of an ent.
BTW. Like the new version
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
Well, theoretically it is indeed an improvement. But I have both opened
and when I swap between them all I have to say is Bad Marnie, Bad, bad
Marnie ;-).
Boris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then
I'll catch up. I also said no
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days, then
I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However, this isn't a
new one.
With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I went out and dug an oak tree up
and moved it about 20-30 feet into the frame, where
I much prefer the re-do with the tree. I'd like both versions a little
better if the stack peeking over the hill to the left were moved about
30 yards down the hill..or at least out of sight. :)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few
Yes - much better since you moved the Oak tree.
Maris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few days,
then I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week.
However, this isn't a new one.
With a lot of time and trouble to myself, I
That is much improved. :-)
G
On May 6, 2007, at 10:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I won't have time to comment on others' PESOs for a few
days, then
I'll catch up. I also said no new PESOs until next week. However,
this isn't a
new one.
With a lot of time and trouble to
but.
Is this still a photograph.
Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter.
Is it making the point to your obvious lovely work forum.
Not sure removing large objects helps for what your trying to do. As
you see. i have a bit of a kerfuffle with this.
Dave
On 5/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL
In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:33:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but.
Is this still a photograph.
Removing a tree to enhance a subject matter.
Is it making the point to your obvious lovely work forum.
Not sure removing large objects helps for what your trying to
In a message dated 5/6/2007 11:55:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I much prefer the re-do with the tree. I'd like both versions a little
better if the stack peeking over the hill to the left were moved about
30 yards down the hill..or at least out of sight. :)
Jack
16 matches
Mail list logo
