RE: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread John Coyle
. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML Sent: Friday, 20 May 2016 17:31 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg? B >

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Donald Guthrie
Oh, you've been looking at my portfolio have you? On 5/20/16 12:42 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 14 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:41:13 -0400 From: Mark Roberts<postmas...@robertstech.com> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archive

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread John
On 5/20/2016 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age Yeah but a lot of digital age photography just isn't good photography. Kenneth Waller That's not new with the "digital age" either. -- Science - Questions we

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Brewer wrote: >On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>> It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start >>> with the digital age >> >> Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography. >> >It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Ken Waller
DiGiorgi" <godd...@me.com> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital" thread? Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now? Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film photography...

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Gonz
Excellent picture and scan. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos, regardless > of format. > > On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>> >>> It is always reassuring to find out good

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Doug Brewer
It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos, regardless of format. On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography.

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital" thread? Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now? Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film photography... :-/ G On May 20, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Ken Waller wrote: >> It is

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Ken Waller
; <shark50...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age. On 5/20/16 7:17 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 8 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:22:41 +1000 From: "John Coyle"<jco.

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Christine Aguila
Lovely, John! It’s a beauty! Cheers, Christine > On May 20, 2016, at 2:22 AM, John Coyle wrote: > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much > wet processing of older > photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Jack Davis
rom: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Coyle > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:23 AM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' <pdml@pdml.net> > Subject: PESO - from the archives > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much >

RE: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Malcolm Smith
John Coyle wrote: > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do > much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of the > archive, which goes back 49 years! So, now I am scanning only those > worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they

Re: PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread Bob W-PDML
That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg? B > On 20 May 2016, at 08:24, John Coyle wrote: > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much > wet processing of older > photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back

PESO - from the archives

2016-05-20 Thread John Coyle
I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back 49 years! So, now I am scanning only those worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they will be the main family