Nevertheless, it was a referendum by popular vote.
Civil rights should not be left for the masses to take away as they see fit.
If southern states had voted on civil rights for minorities during the
1960s, do you really think anything would have changed?
No. There will always be a part of
Far too much anger here. That never solves problems. But I'll have no
more to say about it.
Paul
On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:55 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 7:42 PM, PN Stenquist wrote:
In an earlier post you called the Mormons fundamentalist radicals.
No. I said that
On Nov 17, 2008, at 4:54 AM, PN Stenquist wrote:
Far too much anger here. That never solves problems. But I'll have
no more to say about it.
Paul
What a ridiculous assertion!
Do you think the colonists of the American Revolution were not angry?
If they weren't, we'd all be shouting Hail
From the No On Proposition 8 rally today in San Jose ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/167-rights.jpg
Rights! - San Jose 2008
There were Gay Rights rallies all across the US and around the world
today, and I went to the one in San Francisco. It was the biggest
political event I've ever
On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:29 , John Celio wrote:
From the No On Proposition 8 rally today in San Jose ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/167-rights.jpg
Rights! - San Jose 2008
There were Gay Rights rallies all across the US and around the world
today, and I went to the one in San Francisco.
Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:29 , John Celio wrote:
From the No On Proposition 8 rally today in San Jose ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/167-rights.jpg
Rights! - San Jose 2008
There were Gay Rights rallies all across the US and around the world
today, and I went
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works in
a democracy. And it isn't about rights, it's about terminology.
Marriage vs. Civil Union. Much ado about nothing.
Paul
On Nov 16, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 11:29 , John Celio wrote:
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works in
a democracy. And it isn't about rights, it's about terminology.
Marriage vs. Civil Union. Much ado about nothing.
Separate but equal is never equal.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
On Nov 16, 2008, at 1:07 PM, PN Stenquist wrote:
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works
in a democracy. And it isn't about rights, it's about terminology.
Marriage vs. Civil Union. Much ado about nothing.
Without want to delve too deeply into the politics of
Hear hear, Godfrey. I wish I could be as eloquent as you. This issue only
makes my temper flare hotter than the fires of a thousand suns.
I look forward to your other related photos.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 1:07 PM, PN Stenquist wrote:
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works in a
democracy. And it isn't about rights, it's about terminology. Marriage vs.
Civil Union. Much ado
Nevertheless, it was a referendum by popular vote. Not a referendum on
rights, but on the definition of a word that many hold sacred. The
Mormons aren't fundamentalist radicals. They're Mormons, and we have
to respect their beliefs and their right to express them at the ballot
box and
On Nov 16, 2008, at 17:53, PN Stenquist wrote:
It's interesting that the left is very supportive of democracy
until things don't go their way. Then they demonstrate. And turn to
violence.
The anti-prop-8 demonstration I attended yesterday was very peaceful.
Not a hint of violence
That's good news, and it's a departure from some of the earlier
demonstrations, such as the one where demonstrators ripped a cross out
of the hands of an elderly woman and stomped on it. Perhaps this can
all end peacefully. If the issue appears on the ballot again, it will
probably go the
Uh oh ...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: PN Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO 2008 - 167 - GDG (related pics from SF)
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works in a
democracy. And it isn't about
On Nov 16, 2008, at 3:53 PM, PN Stenquist wrote:
Nevertheless, it was a referendum by popular vote. Not a referendum
on rights, but on the definition of a word that many hold sacred.
The Mormons aren't fundamentalist radicals. They're Mormons, and we
have to respect their beliefs and their
On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:22 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
So quick to label, so quick to call others names, without even a
glimmer of understanding or compassion ... bought the line from the
Yes on H8 crowd hook, line and sinker. You must be truly scared to
lose that which is precious to
There are so many problems with this analogy that it just hurts to think
about them.
John Celio wrote:
Silliness. The law is based on a majority vote. That's how it works
in a democracy. And it isn't about rights, it's about terminology.
Marriage vs. Civil Union. Much ado about nothing.
On Nov 16, 2008, at 7:42 PM, PN Stenquist wrote:
In an earlier post you called the Mormons fundamentalist radicals.
No. I said that Massive contributions to its promotion were funded by
the Mormon Church and *other* fundamentalist radicals. The list of
whom is published here:
Godfrey wrote:
From the No On Proposition 8 rally today in San Jose ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/167-rights.jpg
Rights! - San Jose 2008
There were Gay Rights rallies all across the US and around the world today,
and I went to the one in San Francisco. It was the biggest political
The one with the Lincoln statue strikes me, but I'm not sure in what
context.
Yes, the last pic is a hoot (as he heads for the cupboard for 1/2 a
Symphony 3.5 oz.).
On Nov 15, 2008, at 20:20 , John Celio wrote:
Godfrey wrote:
From the No On Proposition 8 rally today in San Jose ...
21 matches
Mail list logo
