Hate, ya, Rob. I would never so much patience to shoot and then stitch
the shots...
Brilliant pictures. Second and the fourth being my favorites.
Boris
On 1/26/2010 6:56 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 10:56 PM
Subject: PESO The PDML book submission that wasn't
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome
Rob Studdert wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
What? Why not? Could one of these not be a
On 26/01/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Well I rather fancy the 2nd one - all are great, but there is
something about it that catches my eye. I think it might be the
strip of land in the center of a pano...or something.
Hi Bruce, I'm always in two minds about this image,
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point
putting the edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_c
omposite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
Beautiful shots individually. Doesn't work as a unit. The top one
On 26/1/10, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
I really like that,
Very nice. Makes me want to visit.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2010, at 11:56 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and
Ditto.
2010/1/26 Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com:
Well I rather fancy the 2nd one - all are great, but there is
something about it that catches my eye. I think it might be the
strip of land in the center of a pano...or something.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, January 25, 2010,
The 2nd and the last one works for me.
Dave
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:56:59 +1100, you wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
They're all nice but I like
2010/1/26 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:56:59 +1100, you wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and
From: Rob Studdert
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
Still, it's very nice, although I wonder what's going
The individual images are great, and I like the composite as well.
Dan
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 4:56 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Still, it's very nice, although I wonder what's going on with the bridge in
the bottom one.
I wondered that too, decided it was probably obscured by a nearby branch.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well it, seemed like a good idea at the time, no point putting the
edit to waste completely:
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y259/BigVdub/Pics/2009_pano_composite.jpg
Critiques, comments and condemnations welcome ;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Well I rather fancy the 2nd one - all are great, but there is
something about it that catches my eye. I think it might be the
strip of land in the center of a pano...or something.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, January 25, 2010, 8:56:59 PM, you wrote:
RS Well it, seemed like a good idea at
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well I rather fancy the 2nd one - all are great, but there is
something about it that catches my eye. I think it might be the
strip of land in the center of a pano...or something.
Yes it is interesting, it's a bit of a break from the usual
18 matches
Mail list logo
