I have now updated my film versus digital practical test.
Not with a dedicated film scanner - but with more 3200ppi scans.
I have altered the order of the photographs to list comparable pics next to
eachother.
And I have renamed the pics, so it's now wasy to see the data of the
photographs/scans.
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
So I dare you guys to make better tests, using a 6MP camera like
the *ist D
and an expensive filmscanner. I bet you'll have to stand on the tip
of a
finger nail, to make scans that than actually match
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
Well, I got what I wanted from the tests. What I see is what millions of
people allready know; that digital cameras perform much better in the real
world, than all the facts, figures and calcultations suggest.
For everyday photographing and for most
://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Jens Bladt
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
There are still many people who do not want to fool around
with digital cameras, they are far more complicated to use than
the film point and shoots to use properly for the non-hobbyist
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. marts 2004 14:29
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
So I dare you guys to make better tests, using a 6MP camera like
the *ist D
and an expensive
: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
There are still many people who do not want to fool around
with digital cameras, they are far more complicated to use than
the film point and shoots to use properly
Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. marts 2004 16:19
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
Well, I got what I wanted from the tests. What I see is what millions of
people allready know; that digital cameras perform much better
: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Lasse Karlsson
Subject: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
Well, well, Jens. Here you do all this work and effort in order to
offer the list some useful insights, and what do you get in the true
If you think of digital as a pocketable Polaroid that doesn't cost an arm and a
leg per print, then you can easily see the reason for the popularity to
snapshooters. Strangly enough, I know of many who never do anything but look at
them on the LCD. When they get their 100 or minimal jpegs used
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
that may have been the case from last year and before but there is every
indication that this year
Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
most people cannot program a VCR let alone properly
configure all the settings in a typical VCR.
JCO
so what? they are buying and that is what matters.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:38 PM
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
most people cannot program a VCR let alone properly
configure
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most people cannot program a VCR let alone properly
configure all the settings in a typical DIGICAM.
JCO
And the fault lies NOT with most people but with the
engineers and the technical writers.. Far too much of
our consumer electronics
Hi!
A friend of mine who sold me my (formely his) Epson 2450 attached to
it a plastic slide frame modified in a certain way. My mechanical set
up is like this: first I take the film and put it into slide frame.
Then I take the slide scanning piece of plastic provided by Epson. I
put the slide
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those of you who didn't read the very long thread about *ist D sensor
and 35mm lens resolution, I have posted shots made made with a Pentax
MZ-S
and different lenses compared to almost identical shots made with a Sony
DSC
F717 - a 5MP camera with a Carl
Did I forget to mention - I allready did that.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. marts 2004 12:38
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
From: Jens
meddelelse-
Fra: Mark Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 11. marts 2004 12:38
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those of you who didn't read the very long thread about *ist D sensor
and 35mm lens resolution, I have posted
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Lasse Karlsson
Subject: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
Well, well, Jens. Here you do all this work and effort in order to
offer the list some useful insights, and what do you get in the true
spirit of PDML - a whole
with a minimum res of at least 4000
dpi and preferably use a fine grained slide film.
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)
For those of you who didn't read the very long
20 matches
Mail list logo
