I haven't voted for my portion for at least two weeks... I wonder if I
ever am going to see the light at the end of the tunnel ;-)
Jostein, I think you're a bit too preoccupied with numbers and stats...
Boris
AlunFoto wrote:
Conclusion:
The minimum estimate of throughput must be about a
On Dec 11, 2007 1:09 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jostein, I think you're a bit too preoccupied with numbers and stats...
5% of about 20-30 of us are, which leaves 79% or 100-200 of us to , oh
you know..:-)
Dave
Boris
AlunFoto wrote:
Conclusion:
The minimum estimate of
For the last fifteen days, I've kept track of my voting in the
Gallery. The rules were simple; log on once a day and vote until the
queue is empty.
On average, I cast 71 votes per day.
Then to the fun bit... :-)
Assumptions:
- A photo needs at least 40 votes before being presented to the Pentax
71 votes every day! Thats what I would call Noblesse oblige.
What's the average of your 71 votes in thumbs up and down?
On Dec 10, 2007 9:47 AM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the last fifteen days, I've kept track of my voting in the
Gallery. The rules were simple; log on once a day
Toine wrote:
71 votes every day! Thats what I would call Noblesse oblige.
What's the average of your 71 votes in thumbs up and down?
It was 71 votes _on average_ over 15 days. The highest number of votes
was about 135, and the lowest about 20. For some reason, both Tuesdays
had much higher
John,
The requirements seem a bit peculiar at first, but not really very complicated.
Size:
Max heigth is 600 pixels. It is a good idea to use 600 pixels to get
the most out of the presentation interface.
Due to limitations in the same interface (which is Flash-based), they
don't want panoramic
Okay, I'll share what I've found out.
Data as of a couple of days ago.
Number of published photographers: 500 (exactly!)
Total no. of pictures: 3377
Average no. of pics per photographer: 6.75
To the statistically minded, it might also be interesting to know that
the median is 3.
There are 89
Bruce Dayton has more than 30 as well.
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I'll share what I've found out.
Data as of a couple of days ago.
Number of published photographers: 500 (exactly!)
Total no. of pictures: 3377
Average no.
Jostein, you don't consider me a prominent PDML'er? (I have 33..big
deal) ;-))
I've lost track of the criteria numbers I professed in the past. I may
have to bother some Pentax type and ask.(?)
I do vote and feel a smidgen guilty if I don't support the effort. Once
I start voting, I generally
Jack Davis wrote:
Once I start voting, I generally continue to do so 'til there are no
more..for the moment.
I vote until the web-app that they use for the voting pukes and dies.
My record is 5 batches, I think.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too. I just mentioned
the first names that dropped into my head. :-)
Jostein
2007/11/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bruce Dayton has more than 30 as well.
-- Original message --
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL
AlunFoto wrote:
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too.
Yes, and they both have some awesome shots.
Plus, Bong Manayon has the coolest name of anyone on the PDML :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
AlunFoto wrote:
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too. I just mentioned
the first names that dropped into my head. :-)
Jostein
Yes, but Dario is not so prominent ;-)
Dario 30+
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Mark Roberts wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too.
Yes, and they both have some awesome shots.
Plus, Bong Manayon has the coolest name of anyone on the PDML :)
I fully agree to your second statement ;-)
Dario 30+
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Every once in awhile we are all reminded that it's a vein world. This
time, it was my job. ;)
Jack
--- AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too. I just mentioned
the first names that dropped into my head. :-)
Jostein
2007/11/19, [EMAIL
Only slightly related to the topic:
When submitting photos, do the images have to have EXIF data or anything
else like that included? Also, do they have size requirements (pixels, not
megabytes)?
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
PDML
There's an uploading FAQ on the site.
Basically, leave the EXIF data in and size them to be 600 pixels tall.
G
On Nov 19, 2007, at 4:33 PM, John Celio wrote:
Only slightly related to the topic:
When submitting photos, do the images have to have EXIF data or
anything
else like that
Does that have anything to do with the fact every time I google my
name I get all these marijuana related websites? :-D
On Nov 20, 2007 4:43 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AlunFoto wrote:
And so has Dario and Bong, and probably others too.
Yes, and they both have some awesome
At 09:33 AM 20/11/2007, John Celio wrote:
Only slightly related to the topic:
When submitting photos, do the images have to have EXIF data or anything
else like that included?
Yes. Otherwise you'll have to mark it as scanned.
Also, do they have size requirements (pixels, not
megabytes)?
600
Hello John,
I found out the hard way that if they have exif data, they better be
from a Pentax DSLR. Basically the uploading program searches the exif
data for pentax cameras (probably just the Pentax part). So the way I
do it, is make sure the exif has that information - otherwise use the
good
20 matches
Mail list logo
