Me to.
It works fine on my PZ-1 but at the extreme ends,28 and 105 it hunts terribly.
Move it a MM and its fine.
I had reported this before.
Its on my PZ-1 pretty much permenatly. Its my BW camera and the focal
lentgh is good for 95%
Dave
On 2/5/07, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
http://www.photodo.com/product_332.html
In anticipation of the new DA* lenses major Pentax retailer in Estonia
has dropped the price for older FA and FA J lenses by 40%. Does anyone
have an example photos made with this 28-105 lense I'm planning to
purchase. A comments from your personal
Roman, I suggest you take very careful approach towards this lens. I
had one sample that would display focus confirmation in the viewfinder
of my *istD but no, I repeat no, element of the picture was actually
in focus.
Evidently the sample variation is very significant. Thus I suggest you
insist
I owned that lens and used it quite a bit with my *istD. I sold it after
purchasing the DA 16-45 and the DA 50-200, because I wasn't using it any more.
But it performed quite well. Here are two examples:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2399802size=lg
.
- Mensaje original
De: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: lunes, 5 de febrero, 2007 17:11:18
Asunto: Re: Pentax SMC P-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 AL (IF)
Roman, I suggest you take very careful approach towards this lens. I
had one sample that would
Indeed, Jaume, apparently different cameras manage to focus this lens
with a different degree of success.
On 2/5/07, Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Boris. Make sure that you can test it or at leat return it if it
doesn't work properly.
My unit worked perfectly with my
Hello Roman,
Monday, February 5, 2007, 6:05:03 PM, you wrote:
http://www.photodo.com/product_332.html
In anticipation of the new DA* lenses major Pentax retailer in Estonia
has dropped the price for older FA and FA J lenses by 40%. Does anyone
have an example photos made with this 28-105
I had one of the FA28-105/3.2-4.5s that I used extensively with the
*ist DS in 2005. I didn't have issues with focusing (it was neither
better or worse than average for AF lenses on the *ist DS) and found
it to be a very good performer most of the time. It is not at its
best wide open, and
Boris:
Is that Tamron a constant aperture? I have the Sigma 28-105 f/2.8 -
4.0, which I bought over the Pentax because it's a faster lens at
wide angle. Given what I'm reading, I'm glad I got it; it's now the
only zoom lens I own. I would like a something like a 28-75 or
something else
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax SMC P-FA 28-105mm f/3.2-4.5 AL (IF)
Boris:
Is that Tamron a constant aperture? I have the Sigma 28-105 f/2.8 -
4.0, which I bought over the Pentax because it's a faster lens at
wide angle. Given what I'm reading, I'm glad I got it; it's now the
only zoom
Yes, Micah. Tamron 28-75 is constant f2.8 throughout the range.
Although there is certain sample variation in Tamron lenses as well, my
sample is extremely good. I get pretty sharp (like in very sharp)
pictures even wide open. This is my common walk-around lens (thanks Tim
for piece of
11 matches
Mail list logo
