So you gonna show us or what??? Bob S.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:35:09 -0600, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, its not normally a picture I would consider to submit for
publication, but it got published nontheless. It was a picture I took
of our CEO. An article about our company appeared
Good for you, Gonz!
However:
Geesh, I thought loosing your virty was supposed to be more fun.
Virility?
Ouch.
:-)
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog
Congrats!
rg2
I'm kinda embarrassed to show it, but I'll dig it up
rg
Bob Sullivan wrote:
So you gonna show us or what??? Bob S.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:35:09 -0600, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, its not normally a picture I would consider to submit for
publication, but it got published nontheless
Juan Buhler wrote:
Good for you, Gonz!
Thanks.
Wish it had been something really nice however...
However:
Geesh, I thought loosing your virty was supposed to be more fun.
Virility?
LOL
Ouch.
:-)
Quoting Rebekah Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rg2
As a point of interest, are you two related?
yup, his initials are rg and so are mine, I'm his kid, so i thought it would
be cool if i were rg number 2
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: Sorta got published
Quoting Rebekah Gonzalez
LOL, does the rg vs rg2 give it away?
Quoting Finding Nemo:
ERNR meet offspring... offspring, meet ERNR
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Rebekah Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
rg2
As a point of interest, are you two related?
Bob Sullivan wrote:
So you gonna show us or what??? Bob S.
Well, here goes: (warning, some are 100Kbytes)
This is the original pic:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/vess-talking-orig.jpg
They asked me to crop it to this: (shame, since if I had known they
wanted a close crop I would have been
Quoting Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
LOL, does the rg vs rg2 give it away?
Well, it wasn't just the fact that the last name's the same and you're from
the same area. After all, you've got a very popular surname for Texas.
It was: Last name's the same, live in the same area, and BOTH USE PENTAX!
Long, medium, and close-up. Typical for editors. You will learn to shoot all
three. 90% o'the time they (editors) will use the close up, and you will feel
the LS was the best of them because it shows context and can stand alone.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
Hi,
Congratulations!
Well, here goes: (warning, some are 100Kbytes)
This is the original pic:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/vess-talking-orig.jpg
looks like he spends all day stapling Kleenex together...
--
Cheers,
Bob
Oh don't get me wrong, I had several close ups, but just not the ones
they wanted. This one got picked because he was engaged in
conversation. The lighting was terrible, so I had to use the ceiling to
bounce the flash, making it difficult to move in and out of the right
range without getting
LOL, does the rg vs rg2 give it away?
Well, it wasn't just the fact that the last name's the same and you're
from
the same area. After all, you've got a very popular surname for Texas.
It was: Last name's the same, live in the same area, and BOTH USE PENTAX!
yep, he's the whole reason
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:35:09 -0600, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, its not normally a picture I would consider to submit for
publication, but it got published nontheless. It was a picture I took
of our CEO. An article about our company appeared in the periodical
EE-times, and the picture
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:35:09 -0600, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Geesh, I thought loosing your virty was supposed to be more fun.
BTW, virginity is an upstanding and moral concept. It's a ~good~
thing. You don't have to use asterixes. vbg
cheers,
frank
PS: unless maybe you're a
for an amateur photo ever?
The biggest prize I've gotten is an Epson 2000P printer, from Epson,
24X10X6.6 VBG several years ago. At that time it was available for
around $750 IIRC.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PUG image published
Congrats. There is no higher praise than payment.
Congratulations.
I'm not surprised at all.
-Lon
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in the
scenic category in a contest sponsored by Alaska Magazine. You can view this
image - The North Face of Denali -@
Awesome, inspiring!
rg
wendy beard wrote:
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found to my surprise that
one of my photos has been used in Clean Run, and American Dog Agility
magazine. Even got a cheque for $20!
Congrats, Ken.
Well deserved too.
I would say My Kind Of Photography, but you already took that
phrase...:-)
A great shot.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:23 AM
Subject: PUG image published
Me too!
And it is a picture taken with the Optio S4. Approximately A4 sized portrait
of the Swedish clarinet player Martin Fröst in our regional paper today (we
have a music festival here).
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
It is a good feeling, and congratulations! You have been validated!
John Power
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I got published!
Awesome, inspiring!
rg
wendy beard wrote:
Been away
image published
Congrats, Ken.
Well deserved too.
I would say My Kind Of Photography, but you already took that
phrase...:-)
A great shot.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:23 AM
Subject: PUG image
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found to my surprise that
one of my photos has been used in Clean Run, and American Dog Agility
magazine. Even got a cheque for $20!
Two of my photos were also used in a book
Hi!
Haven't quite hit the big time, but I'm pretty pleased!
Thumbs up!
Boris
This one time, at band camp, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found to my surprise that
one of my photos has been used in Clean Run, and American Dog Agility
magazine.
It's a start! Congrats Wendy. So how many copies did you buy? ;)
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:33 PM
Subject: I got published!
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff
Congrats, Wendy!!!
Keep it up!
Andy
This one time, at band camp, wendy beard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the
girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found to my
surprise that
one of my photos has been used in
--- wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with
the girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found
to my surprise that
one of my photos has been used in Clean Run, and
American Dog Agility
magazine. Even got a cheque for
Wendy shared:
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the girls. Upon my
return, I cleared out the post box of mail and found to my surprise that
one of my photos has been used in Clean Run, and American Dog Agility
magazine. Even got a cheque for $20!
Two of my photos were
If you could sell 50 of those $20 photos a week you could even make a modest
living from them. (Sorry, realities of the business)
That I hope does not take away from the feeling of validation you got from
having the photo accepted. Congratulations.
--
graywolf
Good, Wendy!
As a sidenote, be sure about the rights you give them. Some major
magazines and newspapers are downright ugly what they want from poor
freelancers, like all-the-rights-for-next-1000-years (NYT, etc).
Fra
Congratulations, Wendy!
Amita
Wendy,
Congratulations! It is always a thrill to see your own work in print.
Even though it wasn't much money, it is a start.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 5:33:21 AM, you wrote:
wb Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff with the girls. Upon my
wb return, I
Hey, big or small - being published is being published. Congrats!
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:33 AM
Subject: I got published!
Been away for a week or so doing agility stuff
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in the
scenic category in a contest sponsored by Alaska Magazine. You can view this
image - The North Face of Denali -@
http://pug.komkon.org/04aug/northfa1.html
It will appear in the September issue of that magazine.
First place
Good form Ken! Landscape with a 600 indeed!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: PUG image published
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place
Ken,
Don't let Mike J. know about that! VBG
Congrats on a fine photo and well deserved recognition.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, August 3, 2004, 5:23:25 PM, you wrote:
KW Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in the
KW scenic category in a contest sponsored
Congratulations!
You deserved it, gorgeous photo.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PUG image published
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 6:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PUG image published
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in
the
scenic category in a contest sponsored by Alaska
That's great Kenneth! Congratulations!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2004 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PUG image published
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in the
scenic
On Saturday, Nov 22, 2003, at 16:01 America/New_York, Ann Sanfedele
wrote:
Ryan, nice to know they are letting you in...
I'm wondering if they will be seeing tons of Pentaxes in this contest!
That's up to all of us, Ann!
--jc
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:30 AM
Subject: Re: Smithsonian contest (was: Defining previously Published for a
photo contest)
Ryan Lee wrote:
I haven't been paying too close attention to this thread, and I may have
missed it if it's been answered already
On 17/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I know it's a rare occurance, but I actually agree with Cotty on this one.
vbg
I mean, there's published, and there's ~published~, if ya know what I mean.
Geez, if you take their rules to letter, then I guess anyone who has posted
pics on Photo.net
On 18/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I would love to see a contact sheet of both your photos of me and
mine of yours
how bout it?
Meet behind the bicycle sheds at 4pm.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Cotty wrote:
On 18/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I would love to see a contact sheet of both your photos of me and
mine of yours
how bout it?
Meet behind the bicycle sheds at 4pm.
Cheers,
Cotty
Um that was meant for Shel -
and meant to be sent privately -- ugh
___/\__
||
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 18/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I would love to see a contact sheet of both your photos of me and
mine of yours how bout it?
Meet behind the bicycle sheds at 4pm.
Cheers,
Cotty
Um that was meant for Shel -
and meant to be
Ryan Lee wrote:
I haven't been paying too close attention to this thread, and I may have
missed it if it's been answered already- is this contest open to non-US
residents? e.g. Australia..
Thanks,
Ryan
The rules: (says nothing about geographical limitations)
and such on-line galleries has published,
too. I'd say it
has to be in print, in a reasonably widely circulated
publication (not like
a church newsletter or something). Like Cotty says, if
they should confront
you, shrug your shoulders and act surprised. Don't worry,
no one here
your interest.
Sincerely,
Karla A. Henry
Reader Services
SMITHSONIAN
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:30 AM
Subject: Re: Smithsonian contest (was: Defining previously Published for a
photo contest
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Ann ...
Did you get info from the web site or from the magazine. I checked both, and
don't recall them saying not to contact them ... except after you've submitted
the pics. IOW, it's ok to get clarification and information about making the
submission, but after
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem
with previously published unless the photo appeared on a printed page
in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have
appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos
Yep ...
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
say, didnt I take some of YOU on that roll of film
Hi,
Sunday, November 16, 2003, 10:51:52 PM, you wrote:
If it's publicly visible then it's published, like a written note about a
missing dog taped to a telegraph pole.
or pigeon:
http://tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/platformforart/images/shrigley/5.jpg
--
Cheers,
Bob
on myself :) )
annsan The cheeky New Yorker
--
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published?
One of the other rules is one
On 17 Nov 2003 at 12:34, graywolf wrote:
Ann, you should check with them about how they define publication. It could
differ a lot form generally held ideas about that.
In my opinion both the PUG and your Website would be considered publication as
they are widely available to the public, but
I know it's a rare occurance, but I actually agree with Cotty on this one.
vbg
I mean, there's published, and there's ~published~, if ya know what I mean.
Geez, if you take their rules to letter, then I guess anyone who has posted
pics on Photo.net and such on-line galleries has published
What do they call that? Reductio ad absurdum? (My latin's real bad - come
to think of it, so's my English). Seems to me that the very example of
published that you provide, Rob, proves the point that a literal
definition of the word simply couldn't apply for the Smithsonian's purposes
Hi,
Just before I crawl back under my rock, I wanted to say that I misread the
rules. I thought they prohibited published photographers from submitting,
but, upon more careful re-reading, I see that it's the actual submitted
photos that can't be previously published.
Ah well, that'll learn
(like this author) approaches the 1/2 century mark, would having a couple
of
photos published in their high school yearbook disqualify (shut up, I went
to high school in my teens! g)? I would think they'd turn a blind eye
to
that, as well.
Oh, did they have high schools back then?
Bill
Rob Studdert wrote:
missing dog taped to a telegraph pole.
Telegraph pole?!?!? Don't ya'll use telephones down there?!?! r, d, g
--
Gary
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.197 / Virus Database: 261.1.0 - Release Date:
Nah, I just made up all that stuff about going to high school. vbg
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, did they have high schools back then?
Bill
frank theriault wrote:ght.
(snip, snip, snip)
I continue to think that the Smithsonian really shouldn't care if someone,
especially the lovely Ann, published a submitted photo on PUG. Now, if
she had it published in National Geographic, that might be different. I
guess that what I'm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It would embarrass you ... I'll say no more on a public forum.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yep ...
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
say, didnt I take some of YOU on that roll of film
Ahem... it seems only fair that I get to see one of
I think you missed on this one Frank. No previously published photos, not no
previously published photographers.
--
frank theriault wrote:
What do they call that? Reductio ad absurdum? (My latin's real bad -
come to think of it, so's my English). Seems to me that the very
example
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published?
One of the other rules is one is not allowed to
contact them about the
contest submissions and they won't
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Defining previously Published for a photo contest
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published?
One of the other rules is one is not allowed to
contact them about the
contest submissions and they won't
Hi Ann ...
I have a few pics for that contest, and was concerned about them having
been put up on my web site and that one was in the PUG. I sent an email
asking for clarification and received TWO replies, one saying that if
it's on the web, it's considered published, the other taking
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published?
If you show it to your friends, it's published as far as British law is
concerned
No and no. Previously published is a photo in a consumer magazine or
other format that was on sale to the public. Unless someone is paying
to see it, it is not published.
Paul
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 01:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules
The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to
our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published.
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 02:00 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Defining previously Published
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 05:17 PM, Cotty wrote:
\
Go for it Ann. Consider that by 'published' they meant in print. Feign
ignorance if questioned.
.02 and good luck :-)
Exactly. Does anyone really think they're going to check entries
against the PUG? And does anyone think that great
On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to
our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore it is not published.
Sorry there are plenty of instances where work is published without the author
attaining payment
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Defining previously Published for a photo contest
On 16 Nov 2003 at 17:50, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PUG is an informal sharing of photographs, much like showing it to
our neighbor. There is no compensation, therefore
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Defining previously Published for a photo contest
Smithsonian contest coming up -
One of the rules is No previously published
works. Is a photo in the PUG
considered published? Is a photo on my homepage
previously published
I sell a lot of photographs to magazines. I have never had a problem
with previously published unless the photo appeared on a printed page
in another mag. No one that I know worries about photos that have
appeared in obscure places on the net. Thus, PUG photos are not
published, at least
In my wildest fantasies I can't imagine that the Smithsonian would
consider a photo that appeared in the PUG to be published. I wouldn't
even raise the issue. Send it in.
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 06:36 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re
After I posted my message about being published, I received SO many kind words
from y'all!! I feel a bit awkward about not replying to each, but there were so
many, and this list already runs so big. So, one post to say thanks to ALL of
you who responded -- I appreciated each and every one
Congrats! That really is a great shot! What were these difficulties you
mentioned with the PZ-1 for this shot?
True story: The first night, I took the PZ-1 and found a number of
logistical
difficulties in using it for this shot. So I chose the WR-90 the next
night,
largely because of the Bulb
The current (December 2003) issue of Hooked on the Outdoors magazine contains
my Oct. 1998 Cumberland Falls moonbow photograph.
I never heard of this magazine until its director of photography emailed me a
couple of months ago to ask about using that photo -- he'd found it on my
website.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current (December 2003) issue of Hooked on the Outdoors magazine contains
my Oct. 1998 Cumberland Falls moonbow photograph.
I never heard of this magazine until its director of photography emailed me a
couple of months ago to ask about using
Cool ERNR!
Way to go! Could you give your website address so we can go look at the
shot?
Congratulations! Will you get any pennies for the shot or just eternal
gratitude and public exposure?
- THaller
Way to go :-)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current (December
2003) issue of Hooked on the
Outdoors magazine contains
my Oct. 1998 Cumberland Falls moonbow photograph.
I never heard of this magazine until its director of
photography emailed me a
couple of months ago to ask about using
Excellent(in Mr. Burns voice lol)
Dave
The current (December 2003) issue of Hooked
on the Outdoors magazine contains
my Oct. 1998 Cumberland Falls moonbow photograph.
I never heard of this magazine until its director of photography emailed me a
couple
Cool ERNR!
Way to go! Could you give your website address so we can go look at the
shot?
http://members.aol.com/ernreed/Page3.htm
the moonbow is second from the bottom (fourth image down)
Congratulations! Will you get any pennies for the shot or just eternal
gratitude and public exposure?
http://members.aol.com/ernreed/Page3.htm
the moonbow is second from the bottom (fourth image down)
Congratulations! Will you get any pennies for the shot or just eternal
gratitude and public exposure?
Supposed to get a number of pennies, which I really hope will arrive in time
to
help with
]
Subject: Published
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:49:20 CST
The current (December 2003) issue of Hooked on the Outdoors magazine
contains
my Oct. 1998 Cumberland Falls moonbow photograph.
I never heard of this magazine until its director of photography emailed me
a
couple of months ago to ask about using
Frank posted:
Congrats!!
And with a lowly PS, to boot!
cheers,
frank
True story: The first night, I took the PZ-1 and found a number of logistical
difficulties in using it for this shot. So I chose the WR-90 the next night,
largely because of the Bulb Timer mode, but also because it's
Geez, Ken,
I looked at the subject line, and figured it was just a pic taken with a Pentax
camera. You're being too modest! I've adjusted the subject line accordingly,
however. vbg
Congrats!! It's a photograph worthy of publication. Great job.
cheers,
frank
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Had a
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Toronto PDML people...
I just had a magazine print an article of mine without
getting copyright and without paying and it's looking like it'll
cost
more to sue than I'd get out of
From: Collin Brendemuehl
What was your first published photograph?
(Yeah, I know I'm late on this topic, but I started and didn't have
time to finish it earlier and just want to be part of the gang...
:-) )
At the (university) School of Journalism around 1988 I published a few
photos of myself
As far back as I can recall, my first published photograph was a
product shot for my former employer's web site. I think you can still
see it here:
http://www.didi.com/www/areas/products/monkey2/MK1/index.html
I was doing engineering work on the Monkey2 at that time as well as
taking a class
John Poirier wrote:
My first published photo was..are you ready for this?..a three-legged
chicken.
Shot on the first roll of film I processed and printed myself, 1974. It ran
in a local weekly, but I don't remember whether I got paid. That was
shortly after getting my first SLR, too
Collin Brendemuehl polled:
What was your first published photograph?
A mugshot of a friend [at the time - she's my partner now] for a research
paper she co-wrote for a chemistry journal. It hardly counts because it
was her work, not mine, that earned the publishing in the first place
Collin Brendemuehl polled:
What was your first published photograph?
about 15yrs ago I did a series of photos of the members
of our band for a promo piece in the local paper for free.
I still get a nice feeling when I remember how they
ooohed aaahed over
Thanks, MIke
Regards
Albano
--- Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My first one was a couple of months ago, in a
magazine
for buildings-home-owners:Nuestro Consorcio
(small
run of 1000 magazines).
It was the cover. I'll be doing the next cover,
next
month. If you want to see
--I shot Supreme Court Justice David Souter, right after he got appointed,
shopping at the Co-op in Harvard Square.
Lucky he survived, otherwise your emails would have a 'US State
Penitentiary' sig on them...
;-)
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
Though not published as part of an article or a magazine cover, one of my
photos was published in this year's winter edition of the Canadian
Dogsport magazine as the winning entry in their photo competition.
Does that count?
Congrats and woof!
Cotty
Oh
601 - 700 of 727 matches
Mail list logo
