Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-05 Thread Dave Miers
: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:51 PM Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch What size TIFF is large?

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A 6-megapixel image from a *ist-D, printed as a 4x6 image, is around 500 pixels per inch. If you print it at 8x12, then it will be around 250 pixels per inch. OK, the *istD has several options for saving JPEG (Large Medium,

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread arnie
Kevin To change the number of pixels per inch in photoshop, open up the Image Size dialog, uncheck Resample Image, and enter the number of pixels per inch you want. this will not resize the image, or change anything else about the image. arnie - Original Message - From: Kevin Waterson

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Kevin Waterson Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch When saving a TIFF as a jpeg in photoshop, it reduces the image from a 17Meg file to about 2.6Meg. How much loss is there in the printing of the jpeg file? Probably not much visible. You can control

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Kevin Waterson Subject: *istD Pixels Per Inch Is 72 Pixels Per Inch the best the istD can do? I have tried the different save modes and still photoshop reports the images as only 72. Ya, but thats a 27x41 inch picture at that resolution. For some

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Cotty
On 4/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Is 72 Pixels Per Inch the best the istD can do? I have tried the different save modes and still photoshop reports the images as only 72. Ya, but thats a 27x41 inch picture at that resolution. For some inscrutable reason, software seems to default to

Re: Resampling Was: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Chris, I've seen the results on two photos done with GF ... they're OK ... I suppose it depends on the kind of quality you want. Speaking for myself, nothing beats a higher resolution original. IMO, (which is usually in the minority here) resampling, in general, lollipops shel Chris Brogden

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Joseph Tainter
How much loss is there in the printing of the jpeg file? There is some loss of detail at high magnification, more so on some images than others. One of the online reviews had some examples. My question is: Why ever would one buy such an expensive camera, put a good lens on it, learn to do

RE: Resampling Was: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread tom
-Original Message- From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Cotty wrote: without resampling unless you want to go larger than your file size will allow, in which case there's nothing wrong with resampling the pic right up to as big as you like, IMO.

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya, but thats a 27x41 inch picture at that resolution. For some inscrutable reason, software seems to default to screen resolution. You need to resize the image to a more reasonable picture size, withou resampling.. I guess

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread John Francis
72dpi is VGA (640x480)on a 14 monitor. An old old old standard. It's also the default image resolution for postscript.

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Why the heck save to JPEG? Don't all labs print from a TIFF? graywolf wrote: Just resize to the print size you are ordering (don't resample; or resample to the size they need, ask them), unsharp mask as needed, and save as a jpeg.

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Kevin Waterson Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch I guess what I am trying to find is a balance between filesize and quality of print, I am printing on 8x12 and the lab that prints my photos simply convert the tiff images to jpeg before printing. They use

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch Why the heck save to JPEG? Don't all labs print from a TIFF? Depends on the lab I suppose. We can print from a half dozen different formats, but anything over about 20mb kaaks the system, so big tiffs

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
2.5mb. I promise you the quality most definitely DOES suffer... - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:22 AM Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch Why the heck save to JPEG? Don't all labs print from a TIFF

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
oops, just realised that this question was written from Shel, rather than graywolf. Sorry, Shel, I truly wasn't ignoring you! lol. - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:22 AM Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per

RE: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Len Paris
, 2003 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch On 8 Dec 2003 at 8:23, Kevin Waterson wrote: I guess what I am trying to find is a balance between filesize and quality of print, I am printing on 8x12 and the lab that prints my photos simply convert the tiff

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Butch Black
Kevin wrote: I guess what I am trying to find is a balance between filesize and quality of print, I am printing on 8x12 and the lab that prints my photos simply convert the tiff images to jpeg before printing. They use Photoshop to do this and charge $5 for doing so. My guess is to save as jpeg

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread graywolf
I don't know, the guy I was answering indicated his lab wantec that. Shel Belinkoff wrote: Why the heck save to JPEG? Don't all labs print from a TIFF? graywolf wrote: Just resize to the print size you are ordering (don't resample; or resample to the size they need, ask them), unsharp mask as

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hmmm ... I guess I'm spoiled. William Robb wrote: Why the heck save to JPEG? Don't all labs print from a TIFF? Depends on the lab I suppose. We can print from a half dozen different formats, but anything over about 20mb kaaks the system, so big tiffs are out. I have had tiffs from my ist

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Herb Chong
Pixels Per Inch For some inscrutable reason, software seems to default to screen resolution. You need to resize the image to a more reasonable picture size, withou resampling..

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Shel Belinkoff
You might get better results if you took istD raw or tiff files, and, after working on them, convert to jpeg via photoshop and saving to maximum quality. What size TIFF is large? Kevin Waterson wrote: Well, the machine they use just wont cut it for large tiff files. So they insist on jpeg.

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch Hmmm ... I guess I'm spoiled. My lab uses a Windows operating system. Totally amateur and obviously inadequate. William Robb

Re: *istD Pixels Per Inch

2003-12-04 Thread Doug Franklin
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 17:51:24 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote: What size TIFF is large? That depends on how much memory you have. I regularly work on 125MB TIFFs (raw 4k ppi scans of 35mm frames). TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ