RE: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-15 Thread Don Sanderson
Thanks Andre, as soon as I get it and check it out I'll let you know. Don -Original Message- From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4?? Don, tell us how it behaves when

RE: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-15 Thread Andre Langevin
Don, tell us how it behaves when you get a chance to use it! It also has a 58mm filter size where the 35-105 has a 67, so perhaps flare will be OK. A puece of information that we find in the Pentax boklet about their lens line is that to avoid vignetting at 1.5 meters with lens between 60mm and

Re: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-14 Thread Andre Langevin
This seems a great range for the istD and an excellent companion to the DA 16-45/4. Don't seem to be many reviews out there. Has anyone used this lens? What do you think of it? TIA Don A bit front heavy. One of the best zoom of its time. Good sharpness and contrast full open, very good

Re: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-14 Thread Pat White
It's old, heavy, bulky, and has a fair bit of pincushion distortion at the long end. Other than that, it's not bad. I used one for years on my MX, and found it to be a handy zoom range. If its range suits your purposes, and you can get a good deal, check it out. Pat White

RE: Comments on SMCP 45-125/4??

2004-12-14 Thread Don Sanderson
Thanks Andre and Pat. It's the same weight as, and about an inch longer than the A35-105/3.5 that I love so much so I don't think size or weight are an issue. It also has a 58mm filter size where the 35-105 has a 67, so perhaps flare will be OK. It just struck me as an unusual zoom range, uniquely