-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af mike
wilson
Sendt: 26. december 2006 19:57
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: Hoya - Pentax Merger - Sad News
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/26 Tue AM 11:26:07 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 26/12/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not much glass in an endoscope - I hope. I,m sorry, I can't quite make
the problem out. Time for some fast glass. Nurse! The 85 1.4, please.
That's pain on a galactic scale.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On 26/12/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not much glass in an endoscope - I hope. I,m sorry, I can't quite make
the problem out. Time for some fast glass. Nurse! The 85 1.4, please.
...thank you nurse.
click
Ah, I think I see the problem
http://preview.tinyurl.com/b39cq
Mark wrote:
The K10D may just be the swan-song of Pentax management - one last flash
before they are gone.
Then I better get one while they're still available :-)
That will keep me going (with my current excellent glass collection) for
another 3-4 years.
No seriously:
Why would teh joined forces
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/26 Tue AM 11:26:07 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Hoya - Pentax Merger - Sad News
Mark wrote:
The K10D may just be the swan-song of Pentax management - one last flash
before they are gone.
Then I better
Fra: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pål Jensen wrote:
Mark wrote:
The question now
is - what kind of camera manufacturer will Hoya be?
REPLY:
Theres no reason to assume they want to be a camera manufacturer. In the
press release it is all about medical and optics; not
The imaging division will almost ceratinly be sold
off to some electronics company pretty soon. Pentax don't need it
anymore and Hoya never did in the first place. This is a sad day indeed...
Pål
No, never in my wildest dreams -:)
It just isn't going to happen!
John
-Original Message-
Unlike Hoya's relationship with Tokina and Kenko etc, this is a deal
with blood exchange. Both companies became one new entity. It was
just that Hoya's networth was larger than Pentax's (Pentax's capital
is larger than Hoya's), but as Pentax's president said,
Pål Jensen wrote:
Mark wrote:
The question now
is - what kind of camera manufacturer will Hoya be?
REPLY:
Theres no reason to assume they want to be a camera manufacturer. In the
press release it is all about medical and optics; not electronics in digital
cameras. This is a way to
Whoa! Talk about finding that grey cloud in the silver lining. Pentax
imaging division is on its most successful run in many a year. If the
Pentax camera business isn't a worthwhile pursuit than the camera
business in general is doomed. So much silliness.
Paul
On Dec 21, 2006, at 8:33 PM,
Pål Jensen wrote:
Theres no reason to assume they want to be a camera manufacturer. In the
press release it is all about medical and optics; not electronics in digital
cameras. This is a way to strenghten Pentax medical and optics division and
make them less dependent on the imaging
On 12/21/06 8:54 PM, Adam Maas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what about the fact that Hoya is already a major camera-gear
manufacturer?
Unlike Hoya's relationship with Tokina and Kenko etc, this is a deal with
blood exchange. Both companies became one new entity. It was just that
Hoya's
12 matches
Mail list logo
