More concerned about not growing older.
On 5/19/2017 16:38, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
LX
Dan Matyola
I'm right behind you - LXVII
On 5/19/2017 15:42, John Francis wrote:
I just made LXVIII ...
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:21:44PM -0400, Rick Womer wrote:
Brian,
I'm actually on the cusp of LXV.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Brian Walters
Bon voyage et bon anniversaire. We're on our way back just now. We'll give
you a wave.
Chris
On 18 May 2017 16:17, "Bob W-PDML" wrote:
> On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to
> Avignon and thence to a gite for a week with friends, here:
>
XXV to C then?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 10:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: LX
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer <rick
I'm with Dan!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Saturday, 20 May 2017 6:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: LX
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns
It’s a LXury.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
> On May 19, 2017, at 4:38 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
> older,
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
>>
Those of us who have achieved LXXV scoff at your concerns about growing
older,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> LX
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I’m LXIX, and not looking forward to LXX.
> On May 19, 2017, at 3:42 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>
> I just made LXVIII ...
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:21:44PM -0400, Rick Womer wrote:
>> Brian,
>>
>> I'm actually on the cusp of LXV.
>>
>> Rick
>>
Thanks y'all. Signing off shortly. Back in 3 weeks.
B
> On 19 May 2017, at 03:03, Subash Jeyan wrote:
>
> Looking forward to following your blog and congratulations on the
> milestone.
>
> ~subash
>
>
> On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:16:09 +
> Bob W-PDML
I just made LXVIII ...
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 03:21:44PM -0400, Rick Womer wrote:
> Brian,
>
> I'm actually on the cusp of LXV.
>
> Rick
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017, at 01:01
Brian,
I'm actually on the cusp of LXV.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017, at 01:01 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
>> I’ll be crossing a similar chronological meridian in 2 1/2 weeks; I’ll
>> have
Looking forward to following your blog and congratulations on the
milestone.
~subash
On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:16:09 +
Bob W-PDML wrote:
> On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to
> Avignon and thence to a gite for a week with friends, here:
On Fri, May 19, 2017, at 01:01 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> I’ll be crossing a similar chronological meridian in 2 1/2 weeks; I’ll
> have gratis transit in Philly and modest discounts here and there.
Mere youngsters!
>
> Have a great trip! Looking forward to the photos.
Ditto, you old bastard
Go well. I'm sure you'll have a great time.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bob W-PDML
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:16 PM
To: Mail List Pentax-Discuss
Subject: LX
On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to Avignon
and thence to a gite for a week with
> On May 18, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
>
> Q: Why is this post entitled LX?
> A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
> transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
This alone would make the trip to France worthwhile! Very
I’ll be crossing a similar chronological meridian in 2 1/2 weeks; I’ll have
gratis transit in Philly and modest discounts here and there.
Have a great trip! Looking forward to the photos.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
> On May 18, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Bob W-PDML
On 18/5/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A: Whilst there I'll become eligible for free prescriptions, free public
>transport in London, and 30% off rail travel
Et bon anniversaire :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
On 18/5/17, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to
>Avignon and thence to a gite for a week with friends, here:
>http://www.tourisme-pernes.fr/fr/decouvrir-et-se-divertir/histoire-et-
Sounds like a fine challenge, even without the stamps.
Bon voyage, Bob!
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> On Saturday I set sail for France, cycling hopefully from Roscoff to Avignon
> and thence to a gite for a week with friends, here:
>
Hi!
Thanks for the tip... Wondering, how I forgot about them, but I bet
they charge serious money for any work by now :(
Luckily, the LX I got should hold up fine for some time. But I'll
start saving now for future SLA...
Camera Savings Account, anyone? :)
Dmitry
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:56
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many parts
out of production, and a lot of complexity.
On May 28, 2012, at 1:56 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
You got it right. I sent a non-functioning Rolleicord and a non-functioning
Konica III to them, and they came back to
Hi!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many
parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
Actually, LX is on the list of serviceable cameras on their web site:
On May 28, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Dmitry Gromov wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too many
parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
Actually, LX is on the
Hi! On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too
many parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
Actually, LX is on the list of serviceable cameras on their web
site:
Hi!
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:37 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Hi! On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A lot of very good camera repair services won't work on the LX. Too
many parts out of production, and a lot of complexity.
No matter what the issue, Essex in NJ seems to make it right when locals say
they can't.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, Louisiana
USA
On May 27, 2012, at 23:55, Dmitry Gromov grom...@gmail.com wrote:
rubber.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
No matter what the issue, Essex in NJ seems to make it right when locals say
they can't.
Are you talking about Essex Camera repair? Never used them, however
remember them being advertised by Popular Photography...
If
You got it right. I sent a non-functioning Rolleicord and a non-functioning
Konica III to them, and they came back to me in perfect working order. And the
price was reasonable. I don't know if they do digital well, but they do wonders
with mechanical.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L.
On 29/11/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Both my LX bodies have problems
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/11/08, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Both my LX bodies have problems
MY body has problems.
Dave
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cute, although it almost looks like you're giving ypourself the finger!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: LX Self Portrait
Here is a self portrait of the Lx. Shot with Ektachrome 100 plus. Joe
One by one beautiful pictures on this site!
Groeten,
Vic
Christine Aguila wrote:
That's a fun shot, Joe. I like it. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 8:59 PM
Subject: PESO: LX Self Portrait
Here is a
That's a fun shot, Joe. I like it. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 8:59 PM
Subject: PESO: LX Self Portrait
Here is a self portrait of the Lx. Shot with Ektachrome 100 plus. Joe
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/09 Thu AM 01:36:01 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
Kenneth Waller wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/08 Wed PM 04:43:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 11/8/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he meant the joy of snakes
Snakes.
Snakeskin.
Either way
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled now!
Maybe time to coil it a day.
Or at least scale back a little...
I recoil at just the thought...
I hope you're not
On 11/9/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/08 Wed PM 04:43:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 11/8/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he meant
On Nov 9, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
On 11/9/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/08 Wed PM 04:43:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 11/8/06, mike wilson
On 11/9/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you guys rattling on about?
Better to speak one's mind than to be a snake in the grass.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 11/9/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are you guys rattling on about?
Better to speak one's mind than to be a snake in the grass.
I preferred the Monty Python threads.
William
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/11/08 Wed AM 07:46:51 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 7/11/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Mark.
I think he meant the joy of snakes
On 11/8/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he meant the joy of snakes
Snakes.
Snakeskin.
Either way...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Only if you want to make an asp of your camera.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 7/11/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you considered the joys
On 11/8/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Only if you want to make an asp of your camera.
Make jokes if you will, Ken, but if your camera's covered with
snakeskin and it gets dirty, all you have to do is viper with a damp
cloth.
cheers,
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
On 11/8/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Only if you want to make an asp of your camera.
Make jokes if you will, Ken
SS..
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Only if you want to make an asp of your camera.
Make jokes if you will, Ken, but if your camera's covered with
snakeskin
On 11/8/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that one, Ken.
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 8/11/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Make jokes if you will, Ken, but if your camera's covered with
snakeskin and it gets dirty, all you have to do is viper with a damp
cloth.
Oh.
That's baad ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/8/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled now!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled now!
Maybe time to coil it a day.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled now!
Maybe time to coil it a day.
Or at least scale back a little...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
Cotty wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock
Would the LX shed its skin every spring?
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: LX leatherette reglueing
Kenneth Waller wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled now!
Maybe time to coil it a day.
Or at least
- Original Message -
Mark Roberts wrote:
Kenneth Waller wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
Are you speaking with a forked tongue knarF?
Let me just slither under a rock and think of a good retort for that
one, Ken.
Good one, Frank. You've got him rattled
On 11/7/06, Kevin Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The leatherette is peeling away from my LX body in two places. I tried
one method without success. Before I try every glue in the house, I
thought I'd ask for advise. Has anyone found a good glue for the
leatherette?
Leatherette?
On 08/11/06, Kevin Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The leatherette is peeling away from my LX body in two places. I tried
one method without success. Before I try every glue in the house, I
thought I'd ask for advise. Has anyone found a good glue for the
leatherette?
It gets quite
He's gone walkabout, mate.
On Nov 7, 2006, at 5:16 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Oh, Cesar? Where's Cesar when we need him?
cheers,
frank
Doug Brewer
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 7/11/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Have you considered the joys of snakeskin?
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Are you sure the new battery is up to snuff?
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Adam Maas wrote:
Battery has been changed (As stated).
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sounds like
Sounds like a battery problem. Speeds 1/125 an above will function
mechanically. Probably the battery is down to the point it will still
run the meter, but will not run the shutter.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
graywolf wrote:
Sounds like a battery problem. Speeds 1/125 an above will function
mechanically. Probably the battery is down to the point it will still
run the meter, but will not run the shutter.
Shutter works fine at slow speeds in Manual mode. Doesn't in
Automatic(Av). New Batteries
Sounds like the battery is dead.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my LX in Av mode. Whenever it meters a
shutter speed of 1/125 or below it will open the shutter for an
unusually long time (like 1/2 second or longer). It seems to work fine
with
Battery has been changed (As stated).
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sounds like the battery is dead.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my LX in Av mode. Whenever it meters a
shutter speed of 1/125 or below it will open the shutter for an
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I in for a CLA, or is there something I've missed?
YES. You do not have film in the camera!
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
HAR! That's what I get for not reading all of the post. Sorry about
that.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Battery has been changed (As stated).
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sounds like the battery is dead.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:42 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
I'm having
Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I in for a CLA, or is there something I've missed?
YES. You do not have film in the camera!
Pål
It had a roll of Silvertone 100 in it when this occured. It now has
Silvertone 400 (Throwaway
Hehehe,
It happens to all of us (And needless to say, that was my first guess too)
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
HAR! That's what I get for not reading all of the post. Sorry about
that.
Paul
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Battery has been changed (As stated).
-Adam
Yep, and it's trying to make a perfect exposure off
that nice, black, pressure plate! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Pål Jensen
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:18 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: LX trouble
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It had a roll of Silvertone 100 in it when this occured. It now has
Silvertone 400 (Throwaway roll, gotta love $2 film).
REPLY:
If it doesn't work on auto with film in the camera but works in manual only,
then it is a switch (or something) that needs to be
CLA is what it sounds like to me. Good luck finding a qualified repair
person to even look at it who's not a Pentax employee.
Adam Maas wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my LX in Av mode. Whenever it meters a
shutter speed of 1/125 or below it will open the shutter for an
unusually long
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:59 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
CLA is what it sounds like to me. Good luck finding a qualified repair
person to even look at it who's not a Pentax employee.
P.J.'s got his hates going on today!
Last time I asked Pentax Canada, they suggested either themselves or
Camtech in
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:59 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
CLA is what it sounds like to me. Good luck finding a qualified repair
person to even look at it who's not a Pentax employee.
P.J.'s got his hates going on today!
Last time I asked Pentax Canada, they suggested
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: LX trouble
I'm having some trouble with my LX in Av mode. Whenever it meters a
shutter speed of 1/125 or below it will open the shutter for an
unusually long time (like 1/2 second or longer). It seems to work fine
with faster shutter
Adam Maas wrote:
I'm having some trouble with my LX in Av mode. Whenever it meters a
shutter speed of 1/125 or below it will open the shutter for an
unusually long time (like 1/2 second or longer). It seems to work fine
with faster shutter speeds (1/250 and above, metered), and works fine
I've been told by independent repair places that they won't touch the LX
because Pentax wouldn't give them repair manuals or parts. I don't know
if this is true or not, but the repair guys wouldn't touch them. They
were perfectly willing to break my MXs though.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Aug
From: Alistair Lax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/16 Sun PM 03:44:01 GMT
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: LX focussing problem - update (long)
A couple of months ago I mentioned my LX focus problem, where the top and
bottom of the screen were out of focus in opposite
Alistair Lax wrote:
A couple of months ago I mentioned my LX focus problem, where the top and
bottom of the screen were out of focus in opposite directions. It proved
surprisingly difficult to deal with, although the cause and solution turned
out to be simple in concept and may be of
Hi Alistair,
I didn't snip your post, as many subscribers only seem to read the PDML
through my quotes
On 16/4/06, Alistair Lax, discombobulated, unleashed:
A couple of months ago I mentioned my LX focus problem, where the top and
bottom of the screen were out of focus in opposite
On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Jon Myers wrote:
I've discovered that my LX acts up when it's cold. But
only when cold.
[...]
What could be the cause and remedy of this?
It's alive!
Move to a warmer climate :)
- Dave
On Feb 10, 2006, at 10:46 PM, David Savage wrote:
Cold grease?
Yep. Grease has thickened and gotten gummy with age. Camera needs
CLA. Shouldn't be terribly expensive, but should only be done by
someone who understands the sealing on the LX and can put it back
properly on reassembly.
The remedy is almost certainly relubrication.
Greases change properties over time and become harder. In addition,
they can accumulate particles, both from the environment and wear on
the mechanical parts. Most such particles will be more partial to
moisture than the grease itself, and thus
Not only that, but I've seen old grease separate in the container.
It kinda turns into oil and a more viscous grease. If something like
that is used in cameras or lenses (I'm not sure it is), it would really
gum up the works with age.
-Lon
Jostein wrote:
The remedy is almost certainly
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The remedy is almost certainly relubrication.
I think that applies to most things in life...
Bob
Very typical of a camera in need of a CLA.
The lubricants become sticky and too viscous.
When I buy used Pentax bodies I test them and
then put them in the freezer for a couple of
hours and test them again.
Many that pass at room temp fail when cold.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jon
Sounds like the camera could use a CLA - clean out the old lube and put in
some new.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jon Myers
I've discovered that my LX acts up when it's cold. But
only when cold.
What it's doing resembles the sticky mirror issue,
but the mirror isn't sticking to the
The lower mirror bumper is not the only cause of sticky mirror, there are some
other elastic rests in the mirror box that are likely deteriorating (turning to
goo) and interfering with the mirror action.
Cornelius Nuzzlemuff III
Lon Williamson wrote:
Not only that, but I've seen old grease separate in the container.
It kinda turns into oil and a more viscous grease. If something like
that is used in cameras or lenses (I'm not sure it is), it would really
gum up the works with age.
-Lon
Grease is just oil mixed with
Cold grease?
Dave
On 2/11/06, Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've discovered that my LX acts up when it's cold. But
only when cold.
What it's doing resembles the sticky mirror issue,
but the mirror isn't sticking to the bumper at all. So
that's not the case. Pressing the shutter
- Original Message -
From: Jon Myers
Subject: LX grouchy when cold
I've discovered that my LX acts up when it's cold. But
only when cold.
What it's doing resembles the sticky mirror issue,
but the mirror isn't sticking to the bumper at all. So
that's not the case. Pressing the
There are rubber bumpers on the mirror supports that are collapsing.
It's a relative of the sticky mirror syndrome. They and probably all
the other rubber parts, including seals, need to be replaced.
Alistair Lax wrote:
I'm delurking for a while, partly to ask the brother- and sister-hood
From: Alistair Lax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/25 Wed AM 07:48:53 GMT
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: LX focussing
I'm delurking for a while, partly to ask the brother- and sister-hood for
their expert advice. I've had an LX for almost 2 years. It doesn't have a
sticky
Thanks Mike. Second one was bought on Ebay - luckily the guy I bought it
from lives on my route home, so I was able to check it over before bidding.
There had been a glut of LX sales, so I got it for a reasonable price.
Alistair
Almost certainly misalignment, possibly a problem with the bumper
- Original Message -
From: Alistair Lax
Subject: LX focussing
I'm delurking for a while, partly to ask the brother- and sister-hood for
their expert advice. I've had an LX for almost 2 years. It doesn't have a
sticky mirror, but it now appears to have a focussing problem. It has the
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Don Sanderson Subject: RE: LX
Metering in coloured light
Bill, do you compensate for this by lowering the ISO setting?
If so, by how much?
With colour print film, I generally overexpose by 2/3 of a stop
...
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy;
if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson Subject: RE: LX Metering in coloured light
Bill, do you compensate
From: Cornelius Nuzzlemuff III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/08/30 Tue AM 08:51:35 GMT
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: LX Metering in coloured light
Hi
Does anyone know whether shooting in intensely coloured light (red @ oarnge)
will result in inacurate readings
- Original Message -
From: Cornelius Nuzzlemuff III Subject: LX Metering in coloured light
Hi
Does anyone know whether shooting in intensely coloured light (red @
oarnge) will result in inacurate readings with an LX? A roll I shot in
such circumstances was mostly under
exposed.
Bill, do you compensate for this by lowering the ISO setting?
If so, by how much?
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 7:33 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: LX Metering in coloured light
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson Subject: RE: LX Metering in coloured light
Bill, do you compensate for this by lowering the ISO setting?
If so, by how much?
With colour print film, I generally overexpose by 2/3 of a stop as a matter
of course.
Slide film, I tend
1 - 100 of 1080 matches
Mail list logo