Well, I'll add my 2 cents...
I used the CC Photographer's Plan when it first appeared and kept at it for
about 18 months. Prior to that I was using CS3. However, I found that I just
wasn't making use of CC's additional features over CS3 (other than occasional
use of the dehaze filter), so I
On 11/15/2017 16:47, Larry Colen wrote:
My friend Candice ccmo...@pacbell.net asked me about photoshop cc, and when I
asked why she said:
I'm looking for reviews from people I know, because Brett wants to upgrade and
just about everyone I know is still using CS5/CS6 and have pretty much
I’m an unemployed professional baseball player.
> On Nov 16, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 16, 2017, at 10:40 AM, P. J. Alling
>> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't used Photoshop CC but if you want to work for pay, in any part of
>>
> On Nov 16, 2017, at 10:40 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> I haven't used Photoshop CC but if you want to work for pay, in any part of
> the graphics, industry that's what you use.
Candice happens to be an unemployed professional graphic artist. It’s actually
for
I use it. I don't use it as much as I use Lightroom, but I do sometimes
slide it open if I determine I need something it offers that LR doesn't,
and it works. The newest version is pretty snappy, even on my relatively
old MBP, although I have to say I seldom work with excessively large files.
I haven't used Photoshop CC but if you want to work for pay, in any part
of the graphics, industry that's what you use.
I'm still using Photoshop CS2. I'm not an artist or illustrator,
professional or otherwise. I'm an, occasionally good, photographer. I
don't need 90% of the features that
On 11/15/2017 16:47, Larry Colen wrote:
My friend Candice ccmo...@pacbell.net asked me about photoshop cc, and when I
asked why she said:
I'm looking for reviews from people I know, because Brett wants to upgrade and
just about everyone I know is still using CS5/CS6 and have pretty much
Frankly its obvious that new development is only going to be on CC
from this point forward. Lightroom 6 was constantly behind the CC
version too, so that should say a lot about how much they care about
it. Adobe wanted to pull this move to subscription all along. It makes
sense if you regularly
Didn't mean to quote John there btw either. Just a general reply. :)
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> CC has come quite a ways since version 5. Just being able to do
> panoramas and hdr in lightroom alone is pretty huge. For $10 a month
> with photoshop
CC has come quite a ways since version 5. Just being able to do
panoramas and hdr in lightroom alone is pretty huge. For $10 a month
with photoshop its really not a bad deal at all considering what you
get. Photoshop CC is pretty nice too. The new CC Classic has a lot of
performance improvements
I've had the CC version since it was launched, and have had absolutely no
issues with it. I moved
up to it from PS Elements, and before then had CS3, so there was a significant
improvement in
functionality. The advantage of having new features and improvements available
immediately at no
I use PS CC (now 2018).
It works OK, and especially after I got the K-1 and the kamera and lens
profiles were updated pretty fast. Too often a camera upgrade earlier meant an
updated PS too, so if you change cameras (too) often the price of the CC is not
that much.
On the other hand I´m not
12 matches
Mail list logo