Re: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm (not SP))

2006-03-30 Thread mike wilson
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] It may also be a good idea to fill the tube with led. I think what we have here is a communication breakdown. It's always the same. - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software

RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm (not SP))

2006-03-30 Thread Tim Øsleby
wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30. mars 2006 11:04 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200- 500mm (not SP)) From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] It may also be a good idea to fill the tube with led. I think what we

RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm (not SP))

2006-03-30 Thread mike wilson
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/03/30 Thu AM 11:12:14 GMT To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm (not SP)) I believe Mike is right. Talking about led: It could be a communication meltdown ;-) Now

RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200-500mm (not SP))

2006-03-30 Thread Tim Øsleby
) -Original Message- From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30. mars 2006 16:20 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: RE: Much improved (WAS: Testing a Tamron Adaptall 6.9 200- 500mm (not SP)) From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006/03/30 Thu AM 11:12:14 GMT