The full size images are still there on the file server. This computer
just doesn't display them. If I go into the other room and pull them up
on my Photoshop computer they display full size.
Plus, I can't quite figure out why it's only the scanned film images?
The DNGs from my Pentax cameras
John,
Your description of the problem seems eerily similar to what happened on my old
Mac Mini when the I/o controller chip began to draw its last breaths.
The repair was getting a new Mac Mini. I never could recover most of the
full-size images (I had erased the cards).
Rick
> On Jan 16,
]
Subject: RE: something weird...
BTW, Tan,
A final note. I don't think you majorly broke the law by
reproducing that
e-mail in it's entirety.
That weaselly disclaimer statement is just their way of trying to
say, You
know what, we screwed up royally by sending an e-mail, in error, to
someone
to whom
Geesh, what state are you in? LOL. True that if you move, its a
problem, but otherwise, unless you live in a state where they drag it
out like that, its pretty painless. It was for me in Pennsylvania. Big
companies (like the moving company I sued) like to play tricks such as
hiding their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/27/2004 8:30:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phew! Thanks Frank! I was a bit worried about that - in Australia it is
generally thought that those in the US are extremely litigious (sic?), and
that it pays to be very
.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 28 March 2004 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: something weird...
BTW, Tan,
A final note. I don't think you majorly broke the law by reproducing that
e-mail in it's entirety.
That weaselly disclaimer
: something weird...
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:22:13 -0500
In the US you can be a former lawyer, while I don't think a law school will
revoke your degree, so you can always be a law
school graduate, you can't be a lawyer unless you've been admitted to the
bar and if they expel you then you're
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: something weird...
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:25:00 -0800
In my most humble and non-binding opinion, any such person in the U.S.
would have a hell of a time sueing an Australian citizen!
In fact, it takes a whole lot more than just wanting to.
You have to have
Frank, the smarty pants wrote:
Not to nit pick, Peter,...
Har!
tan.
In a message dated 3/27/2004 9:14:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, as I said before, no one listens to me anyway.
vbg
cheers,
frank
Now, frank, I *do* listen to your reviews of my work. Especially when they
are favorable. ;-)
Marnie aka Doe So what does that make
: something weird...
BTW, Tan,
A final note. I don't think you majorly broke the law by reproducing that
e-mail in it's entirety.
That weaselly disclaimer statement is just their way of trying to say, You
know what, we screwed up royally by sending an e-mail, in error, to someone
to whom we didn't
Come on now, he is rehabilitated. Just because I kid him a lot, does not mean we
should hold his past against him. We should treat him just as we would an ex-con
who has done his time, and not gotten in trouble again.
On the other hand, can't you just see him in a three piece suit, peddling his
: something weird...
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:25:00 -0800
In my most humble and non-binding opinion, any such person in the U.S.
would have a hell of a time sueing an Australian citizen!
In fact, it takes a whole lot more than just wanting to.
You have to have MONEY to sue. A lot of it. Or if you don't
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT -- Lawyers, seriously; formerly Re: something weird...
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:35:26 CST
frank
Hi,
But, then a surgeon was a guy with a very sharp knife, usually the local
barber, that is what the red (blood) and white pole indicated. Then the
Universities got into the act...
What - you need a degree to be a barber?!
--
Cheers,
Bob
In a message dated 3/28/2004 1:26:53 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BobW wrote:
What - you need a degree to be a barber?!
Yes. It all started after the incidents in Fleet Street. :-)
Jostein
--
Come on, you can't stop the story there.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Hi,
BobW wrote:
What - you need a degree to be a barber?!
Yes. It all started after the incidents in Fleet Street. :-)
Jostein
--
Come on, you can't stop the story there.
“Attend the tale of Sweeney Todd
His skin was pale and his eye was odd
He shaved the faces of gentlemen
Who
At 01:56 PM 3/28/2004, you wrote:
The Ballad of Sweeney Todd By Stephen Sondheim
Ahhh, the memories of my last high school musical program. The outfits
make up were truly grusome.
Pat in SF
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ah, yes - a famous supplier to the meat pie trade. Of course, nobody
with a degree would ever cut a customer's throat, would they?
I think it was the meat trade they wished to stop...
Jostein
I forgive him he was a lawyer but he got better.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Frank, the smarty pants wrote:
Not to nit pick, Peter,...
Har!
tan.
Any explanations?
TIA,
tan.
I got I'm not here, please leave a message mail from Max, too.
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's just an automatic response that some people, or offices start just to explain why
you may not get a proper, personal reply.
Sometimes it's not well configured, as when it will go to participants on a mailing
list too, which occasionally happens.
Nothing to worry about. It's purpose is
autoreply? I just don't understand how/why it is that only I got one...
Strange, or maybe not, but I can't get my head around it...
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2004 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: something weird
of the PDML,
since maybe a year or two back.
Lasse
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2004 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: something weird...
It's just an automatic response that some people, or offices start
got one...
Strange, or maybe not, but I can't get my head around it...
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 27 March 2004 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: something weird...
It's just an automatic response that some people, or offices
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry guys I know I am supposed to be having a break from PDML
No, you're not.
:-)
Lasse
Just to confirm what Lasse said ('cause you know, after the whole flame war
thing - which seems to still be smouldering a bit - his credibity may be a
bit suspect vbg):
Yes, Max is a member here. Has been for a while. Hasn't posted much
lately, but has contributed from time to time. So, no
I got one of those. I told Norton that it was spam.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: something weird...
Sorry guys I know I am supposed to be having a break from PDML,
but
something strange just happened...
I just replied to Robert's
In a message dated 3/27/2004 6:04:44 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder why it only seems to spit that out on rare occasions, as opposed to
every time he gets an e-mail from PDML? I mean, we should be getting about
200 of these a day, no? Or, maybe his 'puter or
Are you aware of the legal precedents that make these sort of disclaimers
necessary on email originating from a work-provided account?
I rather doubt it, of you wouldn't be quite so off-hand in your comment
about lawyers, and how much power they *should* be allowed.
Blame the courts, not the
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: something weird...
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 09:24:17 +1000
Oh, god, here we go again, please don't let this thread detriorate as well.
I just posted a simple question which was answered concisely by a number of
helpful people, and now this...
Firstly before anyone goes jumping
BTW, Tan,
A final note. I don't think you majorly broke the law by reproducing that
e-mail in it's entirety.
That weaselly disclaimer statement is just their way of trying to say, You
know what, we screwed up royally by sending an e-mail, in error, to someone
to whom we didn't intend to send
2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: something weird...
BTW, Tan,
A final note. I don't think you majorly broke the law by reproducing that
e-mail in it's entirety.
That weaselly disclaimer statement is just their way of trying to say, You
know what, we screwed up royally by sending an e
no one pays attention to what I say, ..
.
have a great day,
frank
Sorry, what did you say, Frank? ;-D
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey frank!
Thanks for the post. I knew that John wasn't referring to me, (and I
realised that I had forgotten to say that AFTER I'd sent that particular
message), but people seem to be taking things very strangely around here
lately, and I wanted to be sure that nobody else thought that he was!
In a message dated 3/27/2004 8:30:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Phew! Thanks Frank! I was a bit worried about that - in Australia it is
generally thought that those in the US are extremely litigious (sic?), and
that it pays to be very careful...
tan.
Do bear in
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: something weird...
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:36:37 EST
Do bear in mind that frank is a lawyer.
Marnie aka Doe So we are not sure we can believe what he says. ;-)
_
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage
frank said:
I was about to say was. As in I was a lawyer. But, really, I still am
one. (scary thought, eh?) It's a degree that's been conferred upon me, so
as long as I can still put the letters LLB behind my name, I'm a lawyer.
Just a non-practicing lawyer.
frank, if you aren't --
In a message dated 3/27/2004 9:14:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, as I said before, no one listens to me anyway.
vbg
cheers,
frank
Now, frank, I *do* listen to your reviews of my work. Especially when they
are favorable. ;-)
Marnie aka Doe So what does that make
Looks more like a range-finder for your golf game than a camera.
-=Mike=-
In the Pacific Northwet
- Original Message -
From: "Gianfranco Irlanda" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 2:33 PM
Subject: Something weird: a TLR from Pentax
| Dario never
40 matches
Mail list logo
