-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: watermarks
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So tell me why it is valuable to pay $20 for a dedicated program
to place a watermark on my JPEGs as opposed to creating an action
in Photoshop to do it... ?
Well, Photoshop costs what, $800?
Sure
Yes, your watermarks look good. So do you photograpphs BTW.
I posted something a while back. I got iWatermark for Windows from:
http://www.scriptsoftware.com/store/index.php
It works nice and easy.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams
So tell me why it is valuable to pay $20 for a dedicated program to
place a watermark on my JPEGs as opposed to creating an action in
Photoshop to do it... ?
Godfrey
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Yes, your watermarks look good. So do you photograpphs BTW.
I posted
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
So tell me why it is valuable to pay $20 for a dedicated program
to place a watermark on my JPEGs as opposed to creating an action
in Photoshop to do it... ?
Well, Photoshop costs what, $800?
Sure, *I* have Photoshop. Hell, I have
On Mar 13, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
So tell me why it is valuable to pay $20 for a dedicated program to
place a watermark on my JPEGs as opposed to creating an action in
Photoshop to do it... ?
Well, Photoshop costs what, $800?
Sure, *I* have Photoshop. Hell, I have three
Patrick White wrote:
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Watermarks may be useful, but it's not foolproof.
They're supposed to provide some proof of ownership, and perhaps security.
A watermark then seems a general waste of time.
Collin is indeed correct -- there is no way to protect a digital image
What is the thinking on watermarking web images?
~Any~ images?
Yes or No?
I do it for my web images using the Digimarc watermark built into Photoshop,
but I realize it's only good for catching the most ignorant image pirate;
there's plenty of free watermark-removal software available. Do a web
In a message dated 11/16/01 8:54:38 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the watermarks are so easy to remove, don't even think about *paying*
for watermarking software
I didn't know they could (can) be removed so easily.
I have a program: All Thumbs which has a
SudaMafud wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the watermarks are so easy to remove, don't even think about *paying*
for watermarking software
I didn't know they could (can) be removed so easily.
Most people don't and the watermark software people obviously keep pretty
quiet about it.
I
In a message dated 11/16/01 10:51:58 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't do any *harm* to add a watermark. Maybe a slight loss of image
quality
but certainly not a big deal for web use (which is where virtually all image
theft takes place).
...First you say you
10 matches
Mail list logo
