They blow'd up good.
They blow'd up real good!
Second City Fan,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:27:52 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Aaron R.--new stuff
Sorry Mike.I was not trying to disagree with you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They blow'd up good.
They blow'd up real good!
Even when you (me)forget to set the pressure plate to the proper film. ;-)
Jeff.
I take it then Jeff your Aaron enlargment worked out
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:34:40 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Aaron R.--new stuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They blow'd up good.
They blow'd up real good!
Even
You are probably right Mike,that you would want to enlarge these
puppies big,but i had Aaron enlarge 4, 6x6 negs this past summer to
8x8 with a border.They looked great.I'm going to stick with 6x6
format(plus 35mm) for a little while longer anyway:)
Oh, gee, Dave, no, there's no right and
Haven't been out to see Aaron since the fall. I gotta get out there
soon, 'cause I wanna get my darkroom up and going. I'm spending way
too much on processing at labs, and I found out that the local library
branch has a darkroom with an enlarger, that can be used for free -
develop negs at
Well, I always felt that 35mm makes really nice 5x7 prints.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't that sort of the problem with 6x7? You really need to make big
enlargements to really appreciate it. I
Well, I always felt that 35mm makes really nice 5x7 prints.
Tom,
Actually, I like to see a little grain in my prints. Gives 'em a little
bite. I tend to print at 6x9, 7x10.5 (mostly), or (occasionally) 8x12.
I don't know why, but I get a little bugged by the smoothness of 6x6 at
8x10. It always
7 matches
Mail list logo
