Re: Bob Sullivan?

Glad that you are back, Bob! On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. --- This email has been checked for viruses by

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Class year at MIT?? Otis '64 On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Gonz

Re: Bob Sullivan?

ugh I'm going to have to change my settings so I canread what GONZ wrote.. ann On 5/10/2016 1:18 PM, Gonz wrote: I did. Don't think it went through... On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Maybe it's Gmail that's gone wrong instead of you? On 5/10/2016 10:30 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24

Re: Bob Sullivan?

This is in plain text, the previous one was not. Also posted one in formatted text a while back. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Gonz wrote: > I did. Don't think it went through... > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer > wrote:

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I did. Don't think it went through... On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the default formatting, > if you don't mind. > > > On 5/10/16 10:24 AM, Gonz wrote: > >> He's prolly having the same problem

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I don't know where I went wrong, but it wasn't a problem before. I've been reading some emails from MIT classmates. Maybe they got me into this situation. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Gonz wrote: > He's prolly having the same problem with posting that

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Gonz, try posting a new message from gmail using the default formatting, if you don't mind. On 5/10/16 10:24 AM, Gonz wrote: He's prolly having the same problem with posting that I do. You have to make sure that you select "Plain Text" from the drop down menu before composing your email. On

Re: Bob Sullivan?

He's prolly having the same problem with posting that I do. You have to make sure that you select "Plain Text" from the drop down menu before composing your email. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Rick Womer wrote: > I emailed Bob and replied that he is alive and "mostly"

Re: Bob Sullivan?

I emailed Bob and replied that he is alive and "mostly" well. He says he's been having some trouble getting gmail to play nicely with the list, so a few attempts at posting have been in vain. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Igor PDML-StR

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Bob last submitted to February PUG: http://pug.komkon.org/16feb/slides/BS-8IMGP3018_ed-1.html But his last posting to the list is dated October 27, 2015. Ghm... Mon May 9 16:20:43 EDT 2016 Larry Colen wrote: Interesting, I also recently realized that we hadn't heard from him in a while.

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Interesting, I also recently realized that we hadn't heard from him in a while. On May 9, 2016 1:06:37 PM PDT, Mark Roberts wrote: >Rick Womer wrote: > >>Has anyone heard from him? >> >>Usually he's an enthusiastic early adopter, and the K-1 has been out a >>few days

Re: Bob Sullivan?

Rick Womer wrote: >Has anyone heard from him? > >Usually he's an enthusiastic early adopter, and the K-1 has been out a >few days without a peep. I was wondering the same thing. This is the first year he hasn't sent in a photo for the book. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Thanks to Bob, I own a number of fine lenses ;-). I salute you, Bob! Boris On 5/29/2010 2:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH. ETA is Wednesday. Rick

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards, Bob S. On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Bob, I own a number of fine lenses ;-). I salute you, Bob! Boris On 5/29/2010 2:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On 5/30/2010 1:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards, Bob S. As long as you get your royalties, Bob, sir ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

No royalties here,,, :-) Not even loaner lenses! On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: On 5/30/2010 1:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: Boris and Rick, Just trying to do my part for Pentax. Regards,  Bob S. As long as you get your royalties, Bob, sir ;-).

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On 5/30/2010 2:26 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: No royalties here,,, :-) Not even loaner lenses! Well, I reckon I offered you to use some of the lenses that you so generously enabled me with ;-). Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Ha! I got the bends I got when I traded up from my *ist-D to the k-7 last fall!Enjoy! -c -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

You won't be sorry. No comparison between the K7 and both the K20 and K10. I'd say the K7 is the most underrated Pentax digital produced to date. It's an excellent and accurate tool. Paul On May 28, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

100% total agreement. Did I say I agree? Oh, well I do. Tom C. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:00 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: You won't be sorry. No comparison between the K7 and both the K20 and K10. I'd say the K7 is the most underrated Pentax digital produced to date. It's

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On May 28, 2010, at 18:53, Rick Womer wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH. ETA is Wednesday. Leaps and bounds, man. Leaps and bounds above the K10D. I look at my

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: There I was, generally content with my K10D. Then... Bob brought along his K7 when we met in Chicago last week. Sigh. Today I ordered a K7 from BH.  ETA is Wednesday. Rick Congrats. The school bus driver on this list

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Sorry Rick. I was introduced to one at GFM last year and couldn't resist. The K20D is sitting on the shelf unused since the K-7 arrived. Life is short. You won't regret it. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote: There I was, generally content

Re: Bob Sullivan has a lot to answer for

Huh. You're not +really+ sorry, are you??? (neither am I!) Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Fri, 5/28/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry Rick. I was introduced to one at GFM last year and couldn't resist. The K20D is sitting on the shelf unused since the K-7