Re: K-1 Pico-review

Larry Colen wrote: >I'm starting to write up a detailed review of the K-1. But I think that >I can summarize it in one sentence. > >If it didn't have a full frame sensor, and mind boggling performance, >we'd be terribly disappointed in it. So in other words, "what have the Romans ever done

Re: K-1 Pico-review

Paul Stenquist wrote: The wifi worked well for me the other day when shooting in live view, but it's not something I need and probably wont use often. I haven't tried tethering. For the money the K-1 is excellent. I agree with you that for the money the camera is excellent. Saying that

Re: K-1 Pico-review

The wifi worked well for me the other day when shooting in live view, but it's not something I need and probably wont use often. I haven't tried tethering. For the money the K-1 is excellent. Paul via phone > On Jun 26, 2016, at 6:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > > > Paul

Re: K-1 Pico-review

Paul Stenquist wrote: I’d be happy with the autofocus regardless. Shooting Grace at the beach yesterday in crop mod with my 60-250, I noticed it performs far better than the K-3 when focusing on a moving subject. I’d also be pleased with the wheel that enables lots of control without going

Re: K-1 Pico-review

I’d be happy with the autofocus regardless. Shooting Grace at the beach yesterday in crop mod with my 60-250, I noticed it performs far better than the K-3 when focusing on a moving subject. I’d also be pleased with the wheel that enables lots of control without going in the menu. The benefits