Bob W wrote:
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
It's a classic dip into book. I must try to get an original copy;
mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I suspect will not last much
longer.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
It's a classic dip into book. I must try to get an
original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
suspect will not last much longer.
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the quality of
Bob W wrote:
It's a classic dip into book. I must try to get an
original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
suspect will not last much longer.
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the
Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
For anyone else interested:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/shops.asp?cat=101
Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
Sample recipes:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/text.asp?page=recipe+1#R4
: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
wasn't even close, and I'm not a big fan of McDonnalds.
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
(Just remember, if there's time to lean, there's time to clean.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/16/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
On 16/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
Oh, there's a small one near the TV studio in Abingdon. The class of
student they have in there beggars belief. I think one of them
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:12:42AM +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
has never
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
LOL White Castle burgers were often called belly bombs . But what can
you expect for an 8-cent burger (yes, that's what they cost at one time!)
Shel
Yeah, 8¢, but remember they were not much bigger than a 50¢ piece!
More than once I got their 6 for a quarter, or
White Tower hamburgers were better. Same size on a round bun (actually they
were bigger (3 bites). 12 for a buck. But those were walk in fast food places
for pedestrians (You stopped off after getting off the trolly and carried them
the rest of the way home) When the last pedestrian died they
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
wasn't even close, and I'm not a big fan of McDonnalds.
--
When
good.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
wasn't even
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might like this:
A number of upscale eateries, including one somewhat toney place in NY, the
name of which I've forgotten, serve upscale versions of White Castle Burgers,
or sliders as their commonly called. The combination of the sauted onions,
thin burger, and pickle slice can be quite goood when prepared
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
those who are pissed eagles are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
This is an error in logic commonly called a Hasty generalization (Secundum
quid).
Land Rovers are not (commonly) armored and mine is factory stock.
I
ever been one?
There's alot I haven't been.
What's your pount?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever hear
Believe what you want to believe.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These effects (killing
Ah... right...
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I fear as an Australian is not so much the Taliban, Al Queada etc
it is America. Look at countries that have been allies of the USA in
the past. They look rather bleak now when they were so well before
being allied to the USofA[sic].
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Exactly what is it about what any other country allied with the USA which
is really not their own responsibility and choice?
Uhh Bob, you guys tie a lot of stuff together
of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
No one here is whining. We're mad as hell AND doing something about it -
and we're not asking your permission - and we're never going to. Get used
to it.
Get ready
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Freedom is not free and it's not a capital asset. Each generation must pay
its price for liberty. We took the hit with Pearl Harbor and our merchant
marine took the hit supplying Briton during WWII. We were aware that the
consequences of stopping Hiro Hito and Hitler would be the taking of
I wish I'd thought of that!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
: London Bombing update
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede
. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:10
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely
I think he's saying maybe McD's didn't make it worse.
Regards,
Bob...
-
The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing.
-
: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
unfortunately, it's people who are very unhappy with the current situation
who are paying the consequences. like in nyc, london and madrid.
those who are pissed eagles are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
mishka
On 7/15/05, William Robb [EMAIL
: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
that you better shut up, talking about collateral damage.
mishka
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ever been one?
There's alot I haven't been.
What's your pount?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that you better shut up, talking about collateral damage.
Or what
or you miay find it difficult to cope if (god forbid) someone close to you
becomes one. i think this is a really lame euphemism for kids we killed
and don't give a shit
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/15/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Wasn't that one of the slogans early on?
WW
On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Just off to my job interview at the local McD's :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
This one time, at band camp, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The word
terrorist is used to denote a person who chooses to instill terror in a
noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as children, students,
and or a general population regardless of their populous. It's a
.
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
The word terrorist is used to denote a person who chooses to instill
terror in a noncombatant
Hmm...
So you are saying that the Americans chose to instill terror in the
noncombatant Iraqi populous by targeting and destroying innocents such as
children, students, and the general Iraqi population irrespective of their
politics concerning Sadam's regime, and it was America's intention to
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The word
terrorist is used to denote
to French King Louis XIV
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
innocents.
Sorry, but in war things get broken and people are killed (sometimes innocent
people).
Sorry if my message wasn't clearly stated.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Thats when a suicide bomber kills 18 children to get the 3 servicemen he was
after, right?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
You're being obtuse, Willie. Try just saying what you think.
I have too many friends of the American persuasion on list (you included, oh
Bombastic one) to do that.
More
of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing.
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
You're
with the smallest possible amount of hissing.
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Ever hear of colateral damage
others and doesn't mind killing
himself in the process.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Damn, Willie! I'd only hate ya for 90 seconds. My attention span isn't any
longer...
What were we arguing about?
Were we arguing?
William Robb
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These effects (killing of noncombatants in Baghdad) were secondary to the
intended action (ridding the country of Saddam government).
All for a few drops of oil, unless you really believe the WMD story.
I don't believe we,
Cotty means they were tracked after the event. Before the event they weren't
bombers, and weren't known to the authorities.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 July 2005 05:52
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: London
The pre-crime division hasn't been established yet...
My understanding was that they managed to track them after the event.
DagT
fra: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
stopped before they blew up the trains and the
Depending on who writes the history books and dominant newspapers.
DagT
fra: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
emne: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
the difference between terrorists and
freedom fighters (or partisans, resistance,
and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
best
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Boris Liberman wrote:
Shel,
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
stopped before they blew up the trains and the bus?
That's simply because you cannot man every display connected to every
CCTV camera 24/7. I do agree that in some
I'm sure if the authorities had known what they had in there bags the
would have. They were only small devices, easily concealable.
Dave
On 7/13/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
stopped before they blew up the
Mishka wrote:
how about bombing shit out of a city (say, dresden) with conventional
bombs? how about shock and awe? why do we say, killing a few dozen
on a bus (or a few hundred in a business tower) is terrorism,
while killing same hundreds in an air strike is collateral damage?
how about
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/13 Wed AM 09:06:49 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:51 AM
Subject: Re
nation they depend on for defense and almost everything else.
It's easy to look down from the ivory tower when you have no burden to
bear.
Paul
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:59 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for what
happens in the word. A country that is for all practical purposes a
protectorate of the United States. A country that regularly
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Keith wrote:
Mishka wrote:
the difference between terrorists and
freedom fighters (or partisans, resistance,
and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
best,
mishka
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the U.S.,
PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:33 AM
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for what
happens in the word
that's *exactly* what i meant.
best,
mishka
On 7/13/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would say in Russian, One who pays, orders the music...
I don't believe in randomness or arbitrarity in modern world...
Again, like you said, this is just an observation, I am not trying to
But it's not out of line for Bill to suggest that the terrorist attacks
are a reasoned response to UK and American policies? Nor is it out of
line to tell Tom that he doesn't have a clue. My response was long
overdue, but it's all I have to say. You won't hear any more from me.
Paul
On Jul 13,
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: keithw
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the
U.S., England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate everyone
WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the
U.S., England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate everyone. They are not partisans...think about it.
They are mad dogs and deserve to be shot down like the animal
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no precogs. :-)
I knew you were going to say that.
Uhoh...
Jostein
This one time, at band camp, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems they were all British-born, and highly likely they all committed
suicide.
So sad that we live in world where a person is willing to sacrifice their
own life for what they believe. I am not a sympathisor with any of these
causes
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for what
happens in the word. A country
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your family
and friends just because they happened
BOYS
Lets try and keep the peace around here.
Cory, three Hail Mary's and an Our Father for you.
This is the PDML, not the OTAML.
I feel responsible because I posted an update on the London angle -
please find your favourite news page for further updates.
So that's a cat'o'nine tails for
On 12/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
stopped before they blew up the trains and the bus?
Apologies - they were tracked after the fact. Their movements were
pinpointed in the reverse order.
Cheers,
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty means they were tracked after the event. Before the event they weren't
bombers, and weren't known to the authorities.
I have some more info. *Warning* grim details follow.
It appears that at least one bomber had personal details about his
I don't want to get involved in this argument can you guys please take
it off list.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
A soldier attacks the enemy and the enemy's resources
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/13 Wed PM 12:59:40 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: London Bombing update
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty means they were tracked after the event. Before the event they weren't
bombers
That's just it Shel, no one knew they were special, before the
killings. They were just four young men
out having a good time. The authorities are tracking them in recordings
after the fact.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
Glenn,
If I didn't know better, I'd think you might be a conservative.
Hopefully Useful History:
Even during WWII the US, in a legitimate moral war, used large-scale terror
tactics 4 times (that I'm familiar with). Hiroshima, Nagasaki, fire-bombing
Tokyo, and bombing the civilian target
On 7/13/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrom: NKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBG
Date: 2005/07/13 Wed AM 03:25:23 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your family
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:32, William Robb wrote:
We've seen what you do to countries that you consider a threat.
or not
:
- Original Message - Wrom: GVCJVTLBXF
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your
family and friends just because they happened to be where ever they
were at the time.
Tom, you really haven't got
Hi!
that's *exactly* what i meant.
best,
mishka
Natural'no. V konce koncov u nas odin i tot zhe assembler :-).
Translation: Naturally. After all we share the same assembly :-)
Guys, Bill, Paul, et al, please take your very discussion off-list. Thanks.
--
Boris
Cotty, in a feeling of mea culpa wrote:
I feel responsible because I posted an update on the London angle -
please find your favourite news page for further updates.
Cotty, you didn't start anything. Your message was factual and informative
to those of us who were following the event. I
mike wilson wrote:
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2005/07/13 Wed PM 12:59:40 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: London
Bombing update
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty means they were tracked after the event. Before the event
they weren't
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Boris Liberman wrote:
Shel,
Help me out here. If they bombers were being tracked, why weren't they
stopped before they blew up the trains and the bus?
That's simply because you cannot man every display connected to every
CCTV camera 24/7.
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't want to get involved in this argument can you guys please take
it off list.
Hopefully, it's run it's course.
William Robb
.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 July 2005 14:00
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: London Bombing update
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty means they were tracked after the event. Before the event they
weren't
PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 July 2005 11:14
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: London Bombing update
I'm sure if the authorities had known what they had in there
bags the would have. They were only small devices, easily concealable.
Dave
It does seem that congratulations on excellent Police work
were a bit
ahead of time. I was rather suspicious that such strong leads were
being so obviously invesigated - the word scapegoat leapt
unbidden
into my head. With the forensic equivalent of day-glo
signage it is
Bob W wrote:
I spent a couple of weeks in Spain last year, after the Madrid bombings. I
noticed that in the mainline stations such as Seville and Madrid Atocha they
now x-ray people's bags before they are allowed onto the platform. I imagine
we will see that in the UK very soon, at least for
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, keithw wrote:
To xray people going on public transportation, busses and trains,
presents a terrible logistics problem. Busses worse than trains.
To do it with high density, fast moving tube passengers is well nigh
impossible, unless the entire system is essentially
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm glad I'm not in forensic science.
Why Bob, your analytical approach would stand you in good stead!
http://www.deathsacre.com/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 13/7/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anybody interested in how not to deal with terrorists would be well advised
to look at the history of how we dealt with Irish terrorism here, and learn
from our mistakes, as we have done. Believe me, we tried it all and it
didn't work: imprisonment
And what's that supposed to mean?
Just trying to be politically correct -- HAR
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: London Bombing update
And what's that supposed to mean?
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto
There's a very selective outrage about blowing up mosques, if only seems
to be against the rules
if an infidel blows one up, it seems to be alright if you're a Muslim,
(at least to some, and if they
are the one's doing the blowing up... Oh, well.)
Chris Stoddart wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005,
King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Keith wrote:
Mishka wrote:
the difference between terrorists
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:06:46 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
The word terrorist is used to denote a person who chooses to
instill terror in a noncombatant populous by destroying innocents
such as children, students, and or a general population regardless
of their populous. It's a function of
Cotty wrote:
UK Police have now traced all four bombers - 3 of whom came from the West
Yorkshire (Leeds) area. They all arrived by train from Leeds, and took
underground and a bus journey, where they detonated their devices. All
four bombers died in the attacks last Thursday in London (to be
Hello Cotty,
Thanks for the update - I'm very impressed with the work they have
done thus far. Hopefully they will be able to delve much deeper into
this and find more information about the overall organization and
planning to be able to thwart it in the future.
Please keep us updated.
--
Thanks, Cotty. Very impressive progress.
Likely British-born? Quite disturbing.
Joe
CNN has reported that one man has been arrested in last week’s London
terror bombings, and that one bomber likely died during the attacks,
according to officials.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
