On 9/23/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off topic, but important for many people here, I think:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darknesis/1424292900/
Obviously, color profiles play a huge role in how your images are viewed
online. This is a good illustration of the problem.
John
Off topic, but important for many people here, I think:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/darknesis/1424292900/
Obviously, color profiles play a huge role in how your images are viewed
online. This is a good illustration of the problem.
John
(removes profile info before uploading, but would
Also I've been playing around with Gran Paradiso (aka Firefox 3.0
alpha 1). It does support colour profiles. Here is a quick test I did
comparing Firefox 2 3:
Firefox 2.0.0.7 (~240kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/FF2CMtest.jpg
Firefox 3.0a9Pre with colour management enabled
On 23/09/2007, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I've been playing around with Gran Paradiso (aka Firefox 3.0
alpha 1). It does support colour profiles. Here is a quick test I did
comparing Firefox 2 3:
Firefox 2.0.0.7 (~240kb)
On Sep 23, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
... Might be time to change my Web work flow and start embedding
the ICC.
I've been promoting that as the correct thing to do for three years
now, whether the browsers were ready or not.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 23, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
... Might be time to change my Web work flow and start embedding
the ICC.
I've been promoting that as the correct thing to do for three years
now, whether the browsers were ready or not.
I've been pretty
6 matches
Mail list logo
