Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

Thanks, Mark C.! Valued remarks! J Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 27, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Mark C wrote: > > Nice - the simple and functional geometry of the silos makes an interesting > subject. > > >> On 6/25/2016 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >> I'll not attempt to

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

Nice - the simple and functional geometry of the silos makes an interesting subject. On 6/25/2016 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote: I'll not attempt to justify posting this but, say that I was struck by it's stately alabaster presence. The small tree on the right is included for the opposite

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

--- >> From: John <sesso...@earthlink.net> >> Subject: Re: Peso-Princeton Silos >> >> They seem more Texas (panhandle) or Oklahoma than California. Very >> "Route 66" from the days before I-40. >> >>> On 6/25/2016 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wro

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

Reminds me very much of the Palouse region of eastern Washington state. -Original Message- >From: John <sesso...@earthlink.net> >Subject: Re: Peso-Princeton Silos > >They seem more Texas (panhandle) or Oklahoma than California. Very >"Route 66" from the da

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

I agree and would include Nebraska with it's corn. J Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 26, 2016, at 4:02 PM, John wrote: > > They seem more Texas (panhandle) or Oklahoma than California. Very > "Route 66" from the days before I-40. > >> On 6/25/2016 4:44 PM, Jack Davis

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos B

Glad you agree, John. Believe I prefer the color. J Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 26, 2016, at 4:03 PM, John wrote: > > That's a little too dark I think. > >> On 6/26/2016 4:15 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >> Paul suggested I do a "dark Sky B" >> See #1074 below. I might

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

They seem more Texas (panhandle) or Oklahoma than California. Very "Route 66" from the days before I-40. On 6/25/2016 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote: I'll not attempt to justify posting this but, say that I was struck by it's stately alabaster presence. The small tree on the right is included for

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

I like it, but I'm wondering if it would have more impact as a more contrasty b/w with a darker sky. -p On 6/25/2016 3:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote: I'll not attempt to justify posting this but, say that I was struck by it's stately alabaster presence. The small tree on the right is included

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

Bulent, I think your referenced article answers the "somehow." Thanks! J - Original Message - From: "Bulent Celasun" <bulent.cela...@gmail.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 6:19:24 AM Subject: R

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

That's pleasing to read, Dave. Thanks much! J - Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" <pentko...@gmail.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 8:45:22 AM Subject: Re: Peso-Princeton Silos thats nice Dave On Sa

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

thats nice Dave On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > I'll not attempt to justify posting this but, say that I was struck by it's > stately alabaster presence. > The small tree on the right is included for the opposite reason. > I was surprised by this

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

>I assume I'm interpreting your comments correctly.(?) Sure, you do. I remembered some schools of photography who deal with real looking though contrived scenes. I very much like to see the opposite (like your image) where the reality looks like/ reminds of the imaginary. I do not remember the

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

Thanks, Bulent! I assume I'm interpreting your comments correctly.(?) J Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 26, 2016, at 6:19 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote: > > They somehow seem "unreal"! > > Bulent > - >

Re: Peso-Princeton Silos

They somehow seem "unreal"! Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822