Keh has them pretty cheep. Well I just checked they have one of them in
BGN condition, for $27.00 plus shipping.
I don't know if this link will work, sometimes these Database generated
links don't. But you can navigate to the page from their new main
page. The classic look page is gone
El 08/10/2014 6:15, Ann Sanfedele escribió:
I dropped it on the concrete when I was switching it off with the f2.8
manual lens. The leaves of the diaphram are now frozen in about f22
position... I think more is wrong as well but I haven't faced fiddling
I'm guessing buying a used one or
Carlos - thanks...
I sure appreicate the offer, but I looked one up on ebay and it
weighs 15 ounces.. twice as much as the 18-55.. The K-5 with the
lens I have is already heavier than I can manage comfortably these
days. (Remembering the days when I had two lx's , one with a 135
one with a 28
El 08/10/2014 15:45, Ann Sanfedele escribió:
Carlos - thanks...
I sure appreicate the offer, but I looked one up on ebay and it
weighs 15 ounces.. twice as much as the 18-55.. The K-5 with the
lens I have is already heavier than I can manage comfortably these
days. (Remembering the days when I
Keh certainly came to mind, P.J. thanks
You're right, that Database link doesn't work - not showing me much of
anything, nope... ;-)
ann
On 10/8/2014 04:17, P.J. Alling wrote:
Keh has them pretty cheep. Well I just checked they have one of them in
BGN condition, for $27.00 plus shipping.
I
Carlos - ok ok I accept LOL! - Thanks MUCH! -- at least I can use
it on my tripod for doing my ebay stuff at home. Very good of you.
If it turns out to be something that doesn't work for me I'll pay it
forward to another Pdml'er if it is ok with you.
I did have a sigma zoom that I had gotten
I dropped it on the concrete when I was switching it off with the f2.8
manual lens. The leaves of the diaphram are now frozen in about f22
position... I think more is wrong as well but I haven't faced fiddling
I'm guessing buying a used one or refurbished will be less expensive
than getting it
Many years ago, a friend bought a used ambulance to haul his racecar to
the track. I suggested that he name it Gloria Monday.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the lid part with a soft lint free cloth... didnt
try to reach inside contacts.
Leaving the camera without batteries for a
. Only take it out at night now but it's still chugging along.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Doug Franklin do...@nutdriver.org
Sent: July 5, 2013 7/5/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: sick transit my istD ???
On 2013-07-05 22:31, Doug Franklin wrote
At 8:53 AM -0400 7/6/13, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the lid part with a soft lint free cloth... didnt
try to reach inside
From: Ann Sanfedele
Oy...
Now I have my eyes back but my camera is suddenly acting up mysteriously
It's saying the batteries are depleated - but I just put in fresh.
I know I got them in right because reversing where they go the info
screen shows nothing. My rechargeables are being recharged,
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote:
At 8:53 AM -0400 7/6/13, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the
On 06/07/2013 9:07 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote:
At 8:53 AM -0400 7/6/13, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and
On 7/6/2013 08:53, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the lid part with a soft lint free cloth... didnt
try to reach inside contacts.
At 11:07 AM -0400 7/6/13, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote:
At 8:53 AM -0400 7/6/13, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries
From: Bill
On 06/07/2013 9:07 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca wrote:
At 8:53 AM -0400 7/6/13, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out
Both my *ist-D, (never used since I think I cracked the top circuit
board), and my *ist Ds exhibit similar behavior. Turn the camera on
with fresh rechargeable or lithium disposables and they show zero
charge. Turn them off and on again and sometimes you see a full
charge. Sometimes not
On 7/5/2013 11:26 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/5/2013 22:40, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-07-05 22:31, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-07-05 21:14, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it finally
but this happening when I really needed the camera ...
On 5/7/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the lid part with a soft lint free cloth...
didnt try to reach inside contacts.
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it
the
terminals, on both camera and batteries, would be worthwhile.
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steve Cottrell
Sent: Sunday, 7 July 2013 7:48 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: sick transit my istD ???
On 5/7
Oy...
Now I have my eyes back but my camera is suddenly acting up mysteriously
It's saying the batteries are depleated - but I just put in fresh.
I know I got them in right because reversing where they go the info
screen shows nothing. My rechargeables are being recharged, so I
loaded 4 double
Clean the battery contacts?
At 8:05 PM -0400 7/5/13, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oy...
Now I have my eyes back but my camera is suddenly acting up mysteriously
It's saying the batteries are depleated - but I just put in fresh.
I know I got them in right because reversing where they go the info
I had hoped someone would say that's probably all it is and that
someone will do it for me - I'm afraid of doing it myself
ann
On 7/5/2013 20:10, Steve Sharpe wrote:
Clean the battery contacts?
At 8:05 PM -0400 7/5/13, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Oy...
Now I have my eyes back but my camera is
Well I did Dave Brook's trick of taking out batteries and letting camera
alone for a while - wiped the lid part with a soft lint free cloth...
didnt try to reach inside contacts.
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it finally
but this happening when I really needed the camera
On 2013-07-05 21:14, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it finally
but this happening when I really needed the camera ... well.. very scary
I don't think I have an *istD around here anymore, but I've got a K100D
I'll send you, if you need it. That
Thanks for the offer, Doug - I might be able to borrow a back up from
someone nearby . Then I had this wicked thought that I'd ask him for
exactly the amount of money I could get a k-5 for. :-)
At least my Fridge is covered by warranty
ann
On 7/5/2013 22:31, Doug Franklin wrote:
On
On 2013-07-05 22:31, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-07-05 21:14, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it finally
but this happening when I really needed the camera ... well.. very scary
I don't think I have an *istD around here anymore, but I've got a K100D
On 7/5/2013 22:40, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-07-05 22:31, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2013-07-05 21:14, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Leaving the camera without batteries for a while did it finally
but this happening when I really needed the camera ... well.. very scary
I don't think I have an
On Jun 7, 2013, at 7:06 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-06-07 16:18 Eric Weir wrote
I knew about the adapter. Could I daisy-chain two hard drives to it?
dozens, theoretically
but it only provides 7 watts bus power; people have reported trouble
daisy-chaining multiple bus-powered
On May 31, 2013, at 2:46 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
That's a hard lesson too, sorry about your loss but glad that you
solved the mystery. It's so very easy to stuff up, regular back-ups
are so damn important. I destroyed my image database the other day by
inadvertently installing an app whilst
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013, Eric Weir wrote:
Another factor holding me up is that I've been planning to get a new
MacBook, probably a MacBook Air, and I was surprised to find that
the latter, and I believe the former, too, no longer have FireWire
ports. Two of my three external drives are FireWire
on 2013-06-07 13:15 Eric Weir wrote
Another factor holding me up is that I've been planning to get a new MacBook,
probably a MacBook Air, and I was surprised to find that the latter, and I
believe the former, too, no longer have FireWire ports. Two of my three
external drives are FireWire and
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:53 PM, steve harley wrote:
it's not quite so dire — Apple Sells a Thunderbolt to Firewire adapter for
$30; if you aren't using the Thunderbolt port for something else (or if the
something else has a pass-through), i would pick one up; there are also some
interesting
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD464ZM/A/apple-thunderbolt-to-firewire-adaptor
The MacBook Pro with non-Retina display still has Firewire, though.
Thanks, Aahz. I was unsure of myself about the Macbook Pro. It's an option. A
less expensive
on 2013-06-07 16:18 Eric Weir wrote
I knew about the adapter. Could I daisy-chain two hard drives to it?
dozens, theoretically
but it only provides 7 watts bus power; people have reported trouble
daisy-chaining multiple bus-powered devices with the adapter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 30 May 2013 10:27, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Lessons learned, at least as of the moment: [1] Again, pay attention to your
photo database. Visit it often. Don't assume that it's safe. Make sure it's
safe. [2] Go in for all the redundancy you can take advantage of. E.g.,
On May 28, 2013, at 8:30 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I now know what happened: I had forgotten that I had a new hard drive put in
at the end of December!
And now I know even better. I have been really, really stupid. This is the
story: Prior to getting the new drive I had been excluding my photo
On May 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, steve harley wrote:
that is the most likely explanation; also consider any changes you've made
since you last used LR (such as folder or drive names)
Thanks, Steve. Wish that it were so. Unfortunately it seems not to be.
Yesterday afternoon I downloaded
On May 26, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Time Machine can be
told to backup other attached drives and that's how I use it. I have a
1 TB Time Machine drive backing up an attached 2 TB drive plus the 250
GB internal drive and it's keeping stuff way back to last November.
Curious how
On 28 May 2013, at 13:07, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 12:34 PM, steve harley wrote:
that is the most likely explanation; also consider any changes you've made
since you last used LR (such as folder or drive names)
Thanks, Steve. Wish that it were so.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On May 26, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Time Machine can be
told to backup other attached drives and that's how I use it. I have a
1 TB Time Machine drive backing up an attached 2 TB drive plus the 250
GB
on 2013-05-28 6:07 Eric Weir wrote
Thanks, Steve. Wish that it were so. Unfortunately it seems not to be.
no luck with Spotlight?
Yesterday afternoon I downloaded StellarPhoenixMacDataRecoveryand set it to work scanning for photo files. It churned away till about 7:30 AM
this morning. The
On May 28, 2013, at 7:13 PM, steve harley wrote:
as a two-bit consultant who occasionally saves people from backup disasters,
i would consider another possibility; if TM was restarted, such as might have
happened if it thought you had a new internal disk drive, the old TM archive
may
on 2013-05-28 18:30 Eric Weir wrote
Thanks, Steven. I now know what happened: I had forgotten that I had a new hard
drive put in at the end of December!
ulp, sorry to lead you to clarity without joy
still hope of a secondary backup still on the Time Machine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On May 26, 2013, at 8:49 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Are the photos gone as well?
I mean is it just the catalog that is hosed or have you lost the actual
images?
The catalogue is still there. I can see a representation of every single image.
But the images are gone.
On May 26, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Did you reformat your memory card? That should happen only after a confirmed
backup. On critical work I wait until pics are rendered and delivered.
Thanks, Paul. It's my entire photo database that I've lost.
On May 26, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Are you absolutely certain that the original image files are gone?
Where on your system are/were the imported image files saved to: the
Mac internal drive or one of the external drives?
If you somehow altered the pathname to where Lr expects
On 27 May 2013 19:33, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I'm sure I didn't have anywhere near as many images as you guys---and
gals---do. Most of mine date from early 2010, when I got my ist*DS. There are
a few older than that. But everything I had is gone.
That sounds absolutely dire,
On May 27, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
As for avoiding loss, besides the internal drive, Time Machine can be
told to backup other attached drives and that's how I use it. I have a
1 TB Time Machine drive backing up an attached 2 TB drive plus the 250
GB
On May 27, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
That sounds absolutely dire, is there possibly a way that you may be
able to do file recovery on the local drive?
Thanks, Rob,
I've wondered about that. It's looking like it may be my only hope. But my
guess is this happened so long ago that
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought it was one shoot. That's awful. I do hope there's
something you're missing.
Paul
On May 27, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On May 26, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Did you reformat your memory card? That should happen only after
on 2013-05-27 3:33 Eric Weir wrote
It is possible that it accidentally got moved somewhere lower down. [I checked
the /Documents folder, but it wasn't there.] I'll make a more systematic check
lower down,
that is the most likely explanation; also consider any changes you've made
since you
in the trash. Not
even by searching.
I have Time Machine. I kept going back in it till I could go no further. Still
no database. Time Machine goes back further than the last images I uploaded. I
don't understand how it could be missing from a backup prior to that. I am sick.
Thought I had a good
kept going back in it till I could go no further.
Still no database. Time Machine goes back further than the last images I
uploaded. I don't understand how it could be missing from a backup prior to
that. I am sick.
Thought I had a good system. Two hard drives in addition to the one
it. Not even in the trash. Not even by searching.
I have Time Machine. I kept going back in it till I could go no
further. Still no database. Time Machine goes back further than the
last images I uploaded. I don't understand how it could be missing
from a backup prior to that. I am sick.
Thought I
it could be missing from a backup prior to
that. I am sick.
Thought I had a good system. Two hard drives in addition to the one on which
I have Time Machine. Backup one to the other and then the hard drive on my
MacBook to the first. By the end of the second day, whatever was deleted
Don't you just hate it when you find a drunken elk in your apple tree?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14842999
We should invite it to join the PDMLk.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Got a chuckle out of this...
http://newsarse.com/2010/08/06/terrorists-sick-of-being-treated-like-photographers/
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
March 2010 1:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
On 20/03/2010, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
G,
This is why I am so upset. I went to a pro lab and had expensive
high quality scans done. And I am just not happy with the quality.
It may be a bit
On 20/03/2010, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
G,
This is why I am so upset. I went to a pro lab and had expensive
high quality scans done. And I am just not happy with the quality.
It may be a bit late but I'll add my 2c worth in. Having owned and
used way too many scanners all I
in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
NW noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
NW And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans
NW from a roll of film? Help!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
exaggerated the effect, but I'm
NW leaving it as such for the time being so everyone can see what I'm
NW referring to.
NW See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
NW noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
NW And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
I keep trying to go digital, but I just can't.
I just love film.
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Isn't that a bit like saying there's no reason to play a real piano if
you're going to record it digitally? You might as well use a digital
piano, right?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:32 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
Isn't that a bit like saying there's no reason to play a real piano if
you're going to record it digitally? You might as well use
, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
I keep trying to go digital, but I just can't.
I just love film.
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
William Robb
: Sick of cheap scans
I keep trying to go digital, but I just can't.
I just love film.
There isn't a lot of reason to shoot film if you are going to scan it.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Sick of cheap scans
The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look.
I prefer the process.
I find it odd that a person can prefer importing a digital file by scanning
a piece of film rather than just
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look.
I prefer the process.
Thanks for the input.
If you prefer the look and the process of working with film, I'd
recommend either buying a top-notch
On 3/19/2010 7:48 AM, Otis C. Wright, Jr. wrote:
Logic doesn't quite match my limited experience
Paging Mr. Roberts to the white courtesy phone ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
G,
This is why I am so upset. I went to a pro lab and had expensive
high quality scans done. And I am just not happy with the quality.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
The
That was my original point, Nick. Because the world is moving away
from film, the value for a lab to service film is continuing to
weaken. It becomes a difficult business model to work with. This
situation is going to continue to get worse, not better. That is why
I said that you will need to
Check the EXIF on the scans, if it says Fujifilm or Noritsu, the Pro
Lab just ran them through the same machine as the cheap lab, at 3
times the cost. A proper scan from a Pro lab should come from an
Imacon/Hasselblad or similar scanner, or at least a high-end Nikon.
-Adam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
If you prefer the look and the process of working with film, I'd
recommend either buying a top-notch film scanner and learning to do
that yourself or incorporating in your process having professional
quality scans
it as such for the time being so everyone can see what I'm
referring to.
See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans
from a roll of film? Help!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
NW noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
NW And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans
NW from a roll of film? Help!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans
from a roll of film? Help!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax
the sharpening method I used exaggerated the effect, but I'm
NW leaving it as such for the time being so everyone can see what I'm
NW referring to.
NW See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
NW noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
NW And I'm really sick
referring to.
See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans
from a roll of film? Help!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
/
Turns out the sharpening method I used exaggerated the effect, but I'm
leaving it as such for the time being so everyone can see what I'm
referring to.
See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital
noise ... unless I am completely mistaken.
And I'm really sick
From: Bob W
Local boys - some of them still live play around here.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=QIIAP_-Siz4
Ended up finding the whole episode in 4 parts on You Tube. Hilarious.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
Actually, I was surprised that the text on the license plate was not
sharp enough to cut my eyeballs (which is the usual level of sharpness
of Ralph's stuff)
I'm quite aware that the level of sharpness in the foreground is
sub-standard. Thing is, I've
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:47, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
Actually, I was surprised that the text on the license plate was not
sharp enough to cut my eyeballs (which is the usual level of
sharpness
of Ralph's stuff)
I'm quite aware that the level of
Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
I made it sound like I don't like the shot, so I'd just like to
clarify that I do like the tones 'n' colors there. Sorry if I sounded
too negative!
I never had the impression that you didn't like the shot. A little bit
of friendly teasing, maybe.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:13, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
I made it sound like I don't like the shot, so I'd just like to
clarify that I do like the tones 'n' colors there. Sorry if I
sounded
too negative!
I never had the impression that you didn't
the Jag always looks the bleedin' same.
Regards, Anthony
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Friday, 16 January 2009 10:01 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO: Sick Transit
My idea
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net]
On Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Friday, 16 January 2009 10:01 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO: Sick Transit
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Rejoyce!
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10,
Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Just noticed that the title might be lost on our overseas members. The
vehicle on the right is probably the most common
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Rejoyce!
Ralf
An exclamation under the photo's title says Frohlocket'. My translator says
that is Glad-Lured! What?!
Can you do
keith_w keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:
An exclamation under the photo's title says Frohlocket'. My translator says
that is Glad-Lured! What?!
Can you do better, please?
Rejoyce!
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
It may be a Sick Transit, but that shot contains as much photographic
worldly glory as any of your other photos, which is to say, a lot
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de wrote:
Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Just noticed that the title might be lost on
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:12:20 +0100, Ralf R. Radermacher
fotor...@gmx.de said:
Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Just noticed that the title might be
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
keith_w keit...@dslextreme.com wrote:
An exclamation under the photo's title says Frohlocket'. My translator says
that is Glad-Lured! What?!
Can you do better, please?
Rejoyce!
Ralf
As you already posted in one message! :-D Thanks!
keith
--
PDML
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Having watched numerous British television dramas where Ford Transits
are the criminals' getaway vehicle of choice, I probably would have
eventually
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:01:07 -, Bob W p...@web-options.com said:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
Having watched numerous British television dramas where Ford Transits
are
is probably the most common minivan all over Europe
- the Ford Transit.
Oh, I thought it was a different pun ... that the Sick Transit is an
old, worn out, surplussed off ambulance.
Maybe it's a double pun.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jan 15, 2009, at 15:46, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
My idea of a christmas photo - taken on Dec. 25, 7:50 p.m.:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/15672899
It may be a Sick Transit, but that shot contains as much
photographic worldly glory as any
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
