FWIW the Jan 09 issue of Popular Photography has a review of the Lumix DMC -
G1.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Margus Männik wrote
of the Lumix DMC -
KW G1.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
KW Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
KW On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
The viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 48 /color
Maas
Sent: Tuesday, 23 December 2008 11:17 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
About the EVF - unfortunately no, it is NOT true 1.44Mpix. The
viewfinder
and TFT-screen both do have 48
Very little written in PopPhoto is worth the cost of the magazine,
imo. I usually go to the bookshop and read the magazine there, when
there's something of interest. It usually takes five minutes. ];-)
I'll give you a full personal review of the G1 in a month or so.
G
On Dec 22, 2008, at
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
I hope the finder is better than the one on the Nikon Coolscan 5700. It was
ok for static shots, but the delay caused it to be unusable for most action
shots - push button and get a slightly different image than when you
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Bob W wrote:
That's very interesting to read and see, Godfrey. Would you mind
photographing the G1 next to the E-1?
I'll do that when I get back from the post office, Bob.
What is the EVF like, compared to a proper viewfinder?
On Dec 21, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
There's no mistaking that it's an EVF ... you're looking at a video
image rather than an optical image ... but it's very bright and
easy to see, the resolution is 1.4Mpixel and the refresh is 60hz so
it appears nearly as sharp as a good
://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:25 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
There's no mistaking that it's an EVF ... you're looking at a video
image rather than an optical image ... but it's
This EVF is *almost* optical in quality. It is way beyond the best
prior EVF I used ... the Konica Minolta A2 ... and that was much
better than the Coolscan 5700 or Sony R1 EVFs. I haven't tried
tracking birds with it but I don't think it will have much difficulty.
G
On Dec 20, 2008, at
Good to hear, thanks.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
This EVF is *almost* optical in quality. It is way beyond the best
prior EVF I used ... the Konica Minolta A2
The Panasonic G1 was just too enticing to resist. It arrived
yesterday. I put the FourThirds to micro43 adapter on it, then a
Pentax K to FourThirds adapter on that, fitted a Pentax-A 2x-S Rear
Converter and a Pentax-M 50mm f/1.4 lens.
Here's a quick hand-held test shot with the Pentax
Godfrey,
Thank you very much for the pic. The camera is tiny. :)
The color looks great.
Is this RAW converted, or JPEG off the camera?
I kind of like 4:3 ratio. Must resist getting one. :)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
The Panasonic G1 was just
Nice pic. Looks very sharp at web size. Have fun.
Paul
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Panasonic G1 was just too enticing to resist. It arrived
yesterday. I put the FourThirds to micro43 adapter on it, then a
Pentax K to FourThirds adapter on that, fitted a Pentax-A
Longest 50mm lens I've EVER seen!
Nice photo, for a test shot. :-)
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
gallery.me.com/jomac
web.me.com/jomac/show.me/
homepage.mac.com/jomac/
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:23 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Panasonic G1 was just too enticing to resist. It arrived
Well, it's really a 100mm f/2.8 ... but it's darn long for that too!
G
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Longest 50mm lens I've EVER seen!
Nice photo, for a test shot. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Bob W wrote:
That's very interesting to read and see, Godfrey. Would you mind
photographing the G1 next to the E-1?
I'll do that when I get back from the post office, Bob.
What is the EVF like, compared to a proper viewfinder?
There's no mistaking that it's
December 2008 20:24
To: SeePhoto Talk; PDML List; DUG
Subject: testing the G1 ...
The Panasonic G1 was just too enticing to resist. It arrived
yesterday. I put the FourThirds to micro43 adapter on it, then a
Pentax K to FourThirds adapter on that, fitted a Pentax-A 2x-S Rear
Converter
Yeah but can you get it in white ? ;/}
Happy shooting.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com
Subject: testing the G1 ...
The Panasonic G1 was just too enticing to resist. It arrived
yesterday. I put
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Yeah but can you get it in white ? ;/}
Happy shooting.
No. Only red, blue and black so far, but it is a new model.
--
Sandy Harris,
Quanzhou, Fujian, China
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
WHAT IS PANASONIC THINKING!!! How dare they waste time and
resources on colored cameras when their lens line is so inadequate
big grin
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, December 19, 2008, 9:59:13 PM, you wrote:
SH On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ken Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
There's no mistaking that it's an EVF ... you're looking at a video image
rather than an optical image ... but it's very bright and easy to see,
the resolution is 1.4Mpixel and the refresh is 60hz so it appears nearly
as sharp as a good computer monitor.
I assume thats in camera
.
Regards, Anthony
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Peter Loveday
Sent: Saturday, 20 December 2008 5:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
There's no mistaking that it's an EVF ... you're looking
On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:25 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
There's no mistaking that it's an EVF ... you're looking at a
video image rather than an optical image ... but it's very bright
and easy to see, the resolution is 1.4Mpixel and the refresh is
60hz so it appears nearly as sharp as a
Sorry guys,
I'm having problems posting and receiving with my Bluebottle account.
Just wanted to see if this shows up.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
got it. C
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML@pdml.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 4:58 PM
Subject: Testing 1,2.
Sorry guys,
I'm having problems posting and receiving with my Bluebottle account.
Just wanted to see
Well, I'm sorry to say it didn't show up.
Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry guys,
I'm having problems posting and receiving with my Bluebottle account.
Just wanted to see if this shows up.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
Rats.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, I'm sorry to say it didn't show up.
Brian Walters wrote:
Sorry guys,
I'm having problems
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:58 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry guys,
I'm having problems posting and receiving with my Bluebottle account.
Just wanted to see if this shows up.
Well your bluebottle stung us all this time.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I've had many nice photos from the K10D/16-45 combo.
So, this evening, I used Lightroom to show me all of
my photos taken with the K10D at f/4. Of the several
hundred such photos, there were maybe 50 or so that
could be informative on focus accuracy (e.g., not
scenics, and not a receding row of
version of Lightroom
which solves most of the difficulties.
Present status of my Leopard testing:
- Another Adobe update to LR is due soon that will fix the print
module issue.
- Issues with the Leopard backup system are more conceptual in
nature, due to the strategy of the Leopard backup system
Oh! Okay, I found it...count me in.
Bong
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Were dio i look. If i click on Scotts link, i get a page that says Hi
and thats it.
Dave
On 5/7/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh! Okay, I found it...count me in.
Bong
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test
I'll help out. Just let me know when.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks
If you need another tester let me know.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'll help
Dave
On 5/6/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Where? In the old submission form?
Bong
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Let me know if I can help.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing the PUG submission form
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
My #2 computer has IE 7, Firefox, Opera, and Netscape all up and running
- I use it to test drive changes to my website. So if you want
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
Count me in!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I suspect there may be some difference on the effects of SR depending on
whether the camera or lens is suspended in the gimbal head.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Testing: SR and gimbal mount
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I will do a follow up
] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Waller
Sent: 12. mars 2007 20:05
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing: SR and gimbal mount
I suspect there may be some difference on the effects of SR depending on
whether the camera or lens is suspended in the gimbal head.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Øsleby
Sent: 11. mars 2007 00:08
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Testing: SR and gimbal mount
I have been very curious on the impact of SR on gimbal mount and tripod. I
was really hoping it could give me an extra
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I will do a follow up, and test at less critical speeds. I feel pretty
confident that SR does not have any effect using critical shutter speeds,
but it might have negative effect using other speeds.
I'll probably report back on this later.
Hey, Tim, as a comparison, I'll
candidate, because it has the mounting system in common with the 393.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: 11. mars 2007 16:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing: SR
: RE: Testing: SR and gimbal mount
I will do a follow up, and test at less critical speeds. I feel pretty
confident that SR does not have any effect using critical shutter speeds,
but it might have negative effect using other speeds.
I'll probably report back on this later.
Tim Typo
Mostly
. mars 2007 19:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Testing: SR and gimbal mount
Hi Tim
I used SR today with the monopod and the K10D and Pentax 70-210mm at 1/90
and it worked very well.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
I have been very curious on the impact of SR on gimbal mount and tripod. I
was really hoping it could give me an extra hand. The manual tells me to
shut SR off on tripod, but I have been hoping it was otherwise in a gimbal
mount.
After getting the camera I have been testing a bit, but haven't
Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Regards,
Bob...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hey Bob's alive! :-)
Tom C.
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:18:54 -0800
Just testing my connection to the Pentax
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Good Morning Bob.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:18:54 -0800
Just testing my connection to the Pentax list.
Regards,
Bob...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
The sun finally popped out for a bit late this afternoon, so i put the
K10D on the tripod and tested out some Custom WB's.
I could not get a WB at normal shutters so i tried longer exposures.
Got a decent WB at 10-13 F4 iso 320, r72 on, shooting sunny green grass.
Test shots show a yellowish
Still trying to climb back onto the list.
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
YOU...CAN...DO...IT...!
On 9/20/06, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still trying to climb back onto the list.
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:13:08 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
81339605151 to one against, I'd say...
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fra: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:13:08 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
81339605151 to one against, I'd say...
No, you need a lot worse chances for the
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:27:57 +0200 schreef DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fra: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:13:08 +0200 schreef Doug Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
Utterly improbable.
81339605151 to one
Yeah, right!
Just back from two weeks' holiday, and there are over
2000 PDML messages, of which about 200 are the Holy
Crap! thread.
I'd love to know the answer, but a careful reading of
that thread ain't gonna happen.
Rick
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no rumor, just
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
Yeah, right!
Just back from two weeks' holiday, and there are over
2000 PDML messages, of which about 200 are the Holy
Crap! thread.
I'd love to know the answer, but a careful reading
http://georgesphotos.net
On 8/21/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
Yeah, right!
Just back from two weeks' holiday, and there are over
2000 PDML messages, of which about 200
On 8/22/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
Yeah, right!
Just back from two weeks' holiday, and there are over
2000 PDML messages, of which about 200 are the Holy
Crap! thread
what's an A20? M20?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 8/21/2006 7:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
After reading the press releases on the new A20 and M20 I have figured
out
New Optio's, announced today.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
what's an A20? M20?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 8/21/2006 7:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
After reading
22, actually. 42 is just ridiculous.
-Aaron
--
http://aaronreynolds.ca
http://battersbox.ca
http://hardballtimes.com
-Original Message-
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
Date: Mon 2006 Aug 21 10:13 pm
Size: 588 bytes
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D
hype
Yeah, right!
Just back from two weeks' holiday, and there are
over
2000 PDML messages, of which about 200 are the
Holy
Crap! thread.
I'd love to know the answer, but a careful
reading of
that thread ain't gonna
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/16 Wed PM 10:45:22 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
nononono
All that Was of CouRse entirely UNintentIOnal...
JostEin
-
So...Jostein's latest message should be decoded
On 8/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly sure we've seen the same news. It's the big part of the
news, right?
Pentax Norway showed me a slide presentation which had CONFIDENTIAL
spelled out in red letters on all the pages, so my lips are Sealed.
Not entirely sure what
Fra: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly sure we've seen the same news. It's the big part of the
news, right?
Pentax Norway showed me a slide presentation which had CONFIDENTIAL
spelled out in red letters on all the pages,
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded Jostein's message.
Jostein gave us some answers, but I (for one) was too slow to pick them up.
Pete Fang at dpreview decoded Jostein's hints.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=19617303
Okay, Aaron, your
Except that's not my feature!
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
Date: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:15 pm
Size: 440 bytes
To: pdml@pdml.net
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded Jostein's
So it is a weather sealed body with USM AF and great dynamic range? :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Aug 16, 2006, at 14:11, jtainter wrote:
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded 's
message. Jostein gave us some answers, but I (for one) was too slow
to pick them up. Pete Fang at dpreview decoded 's hints.
nononono
All that Was of CouRse entirely UNintentIOnal...
JostEin
On 8/16/06, jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded Jostein's
message. Jostein gave us some answers, but I (for one) was too slow to pick
them up. Pete Fang at
nononono
All that Was of CouRse entirely UNintentIOnal...
JostEin
-
So...Jostein's latest message should be decoded as:
WCRUNIOE
Is that an acronym for something in Norwegian?
Get to work, gang!
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 8/16/2006 12:25:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded Jostein's
message. Jostein gave us some answers, but I (for one) was too slow to pick
them up.
Pete Fang at dpreview decoded Jostein's hints.
Hello everyone,
Just browsing the archives today, I see there's been a couple of
reports on the K100D already, so there's little new I can add. I'd
like to add my voice to the choir praising the anti-shake, though.
For the last week, I've had a pre-production K100D on loan from Pentax
Norway,
On 15/8/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
While
I'm not sure whether he an I have seen the same news, the K10D
certainly will have a number of very pleasing features. Some of which
will hopefully make it stand out from the competition equipped with
the same CCD.
They've added
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Another thing I noticed from the archives today is that Aaron has got
some news about the K10D that makes him want to sell his 6x7. While
I'm not sure whether he an I have seen the same news, the K10D
certainly will have a number of very
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Another thing I noticed from
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:42:23 +0100, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
On Aug
The rumor is that there is a rumor.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John Forbes wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:42:23 +0100, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we can safely(?)
There is no rumor, just confirmed facts that are under embargo -- so people who
know can't share.
Though a careful reading of the Holy Crap thread will reveal all.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exactly what is the rumour?
John
--
Using Opera's
John Forbes wrote:
Exactly what is the rumour?
K10D Matamoros Edition: Snakeskin covering comes as standard
equipment.
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/15/06 8:18 PM, Aaron Reynolds, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though a careful reading of the Holy Crap thread will reveal all.
Holy Crap!!! :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 8/15/2006 5:18:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Though a careful reading of the Holy Crap thread will reveal all.
-Aaron
=
I think only to someone really good at word puzzles.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Though a careful reading of the Holy Crap thread will reveal all.
-Aaron
=
I think only to someone really good at word puzzles.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Where's Annsan?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
but I never used a DOF preview button much.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Testing the K100D and some more K10D hype
There is no rumor, just confirmed facts
OK let's try this e-mail account.
G-Mail was only getting about 30% of my messages to the list,
and about 50% to the archive. ;-(
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Don,
Don't know if this is working or not.
I've turned on the email verfication option on the list.
It gives me a message when I get thru.
Still experimenting as to how...
My gmail server died for 8-9 hours today, on Google's end.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/20/06, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bob Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Testing 1,2,3 testing.
Don,
Don't know if this is working or not.
I've turned on the email verfication option on the list.
It gives me a message when I get thru
Hi!
Strangely enough, I have something of an internal clock. For example, a
couple of years ago I had an early morning flight to make. I awoke in
plenty of time to get to the airport and check in without needing an alarm
clock to wake me. Once out in the world, clocks and time are
Please open my weblog website feed in your RSS/RDF reader v1.0 to check
if you can read it. It works nicely on Linux platform, but I'm not sure
how Windows does. Your feedback is highly appreciated.
http://roman.blakout.net/rss/
Mucho gracias and regards in advance,
Roman.
--
home
Roman, I've no idea what an RSS/RDF reader v.1.0 is.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please open my weblog website feed in your RSS/RDF reader v1.0 to check
if you can read it. It works nicely on Linux platform, but I'm not sure
how Windows does. Your feedback is
On Mac OS X, the Safari browser has RSS/RDF browsing built in. When I
open this link, all it does is download a file that nothing can read.
The RSS indicator does not appear when I remove the 'rss/' extension
either.
Godfrey
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Roman wrote:
Please open my weblog
Shel,
Full info at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(protocol)
---
RSS is a family of web feed formats, specified in XML and used for
Web syndication. RSS is used by (among other things) news websites,
weblogs and podcasting. The abbreviation is variously used to refer
to the following
go off.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 April 2006 17:01
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: RSS/RDF feed (testing help needed)
Roman, I've no idea what an RSS/RDF reader v.1.0 is.
Shel
[Original Message
Hmmm ... don't know what a PDA is (Is it like a Blueberry thing?), don't
own an iPod, don't have any clocks in my house, don't own a watch, haven't
heard an alarm go off since 1972 ... I guess I can live without RSS stuff.
Thanks for the lesson.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob W
it's
Hmmm ... don't know what a PDA is (Is it like a Blueberry
thing?),
yes, but perhaps more of a strawberry. PDA stands for 'Pineapple Diet
Adapter', maintaining the fruity connection. For people who dislike fruit,
but still need their 5-a-day, it downloads into their brain the belief that
601 - 700 of 948 matches
Mail list logo
