Hi!
Cotty wrote:
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
In a message dated 6/30/2006 2:25:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/Vicspics/PhotoAlbum61.html
That fox is a stunning shot Vic. Absolutely
Hello Vic,
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit different
looking than the foreground.
The grass is nice, too. I have to agree that many older lenses do
quite well with the digital bodies. I've got a K200/2.5
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do
On 6/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/Vicspics/PhotoAlbum61.html
That fox is a stunning shot Vic. Absolutely gorgeous.
What he said.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do on film and digital...
Great photo of the fox.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/Vicspics/PhotoAlbum61.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do on film and digital...
Comments
Interesting observation, Bruce. Looking again, it seems the transition
from focused to OOF is a bit abrupt and rough.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit different
looking than the foreground.
VM
Yes, great shot of a beautiful animal. I like the grass as well, but might have
liked it better as a vertical.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great photo of the fox.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
The page runs Javascript and has no default URL for those with
Javascript turned off, or more likely a bogus page as a placeholder.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to
Vic -
Exquisite fox (great light - love the slight backlight, composition,
exposure), wonderful grass (composition, exposure)
Well done!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Vic MacBournie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two pics
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken
Vic. You have a great backyard.:-)
Both are great shots and i like them both, but the fox is my fav.
Well lit and the pose is nice.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Vic MacBournie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two pics
Here are two very
Very nice shots, Vic. The fox is amazing.
The .Mac slideshow requires javascript. If you just want to see the
photos without javascript, the following URLs should work.
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/.Pictures/Vicspics/Foxweb.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/.Pictures/Vicspics/grass.jpg
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do on film and digital...
Comments welcome
Vic
16 matches
Mail list logo
