On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, William Robb wrote:
The funny thing is, I am much more accepting of digital as a colour
medium. I think it could easily replace colour film eventually. And,
frankly, I wouldn't care. I would transfer to Automotives.
Yeah, I can definitely see digital take over the colour
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie
That is a quite impressive camera, its quite large. It definately looks
better than the two new
comments below
From: Len Paris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie
That is a quite impressive
I hope Pentax is releasing its MZ-D soon enough. Any significant delay
may make it much less impressive by the time it comes out.
Oh, I think that the fact it will have a full-sized ima..., er
photographical picture-type imag... er um, light, er um, recepter-ccd
thingy, will certainly make it
I do have questions, is there a theoretical limit to pixel
count/image depth/capture rate using known physics?
How does it compare to the theoretical limit for film, on a
straight square inch to square inch scale, using as close to
comparable parameters as possible?
Yes, there is a limit.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
I do have questions, is there a theoretical limit to pixel
count/image depth/capture rate using known physics?
(snip)
Sometime about 1988-90 I was discussing digital resolution with the SEM
(Scanning Electron
I suppose everybody's seen this, but in case you haven't, big news: Canon
has just released its latest version of the full-dress pro EOS-1...
The EOS-1D digital.
Stand back! It's also got a new 16-35mm, which corresponds to a 21-45mm on
35mm.
Check out the preview on dpreview.com . Awesome
The lens is actually a 16-35mm on a 35mm camera, but it has an angle of view
equivalent to a 21-45mm lens on the EOS-1D.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: UBERdigicam
I suppose
The Uberdigicam (Canon EOS-1D) will shoot 16 pictures (RAW mode) or 21
pictures (JPEG mode) at 8 fps. It will also record RAW and JPEG files
_simultaneously_. Its ISO equivalents are 200-1600, with 100 and 3200
available as custom settings. The flash sync is 1/500th. The new 16-35 has a
rubber
Any price on it?
Regards,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: UBERdigicam
The Uberdigicam (Canon EOS-1D) will shoot 16 pictures (RAW mode) or 21
pictures (JPEG mode) at 8 fps
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Paul Jones wrote:
Any price on it?
IIRC, the suggested retail price was around $7000 US, but my Canon rep
said that he expects it to sell for roughly $7000 CAN, give or take a fair
bit. :)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Camera 7K US
Lens 2K US
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: UBERdigicam
Any price on it?
Regards,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED
12 matches
Mail list logo
