That is a fine avian portrait, Toine!
Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
<https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>*
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:04 PM Toine wrote:
> Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and
> bokeh.
>
>
>
d a little by the sharpen ai filter in post.
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 22:46 Larry Colen, wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swir
. Enhanced a little by the sharpen ai filter in post.
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 22:46 Larry Colen, wrote:
On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote:
Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and
bokeh.
Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’s motion blur.
ng focal length produces swirling air and
> bokeh.
>
> Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’s motion blur.
> Notice how there are places where the blur is at the same distance as some
> sharp bits.
>
>
> >
> >
> https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/ne
> On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote:
>
> Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and bokeh.
Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’s motion blur. Notice
how there are places where the blur is at the same distance as some s
Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and bokeh.
https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#=1=006-334-swirling-bokeh-dscn3071-edit2021
Toine
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
rence is (as Paul and a few others pointed out)
> comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens.
>
> As you probably know, the lead (actually, lead oxide!) in the lens glass
> raises its refractive index. This allows for thinner lenses for a given focal
> length. However
rther difference is (as Paul and a few others pointed out)
> > comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens.
> >
> > As you probably know, the lead (actually, lead oxide!) in the lens glass
> > raises its refractive index. This allows for thinner lenses for a
Toine,
First, let me say that you've got a very nice image!
Paul has given a very simple explanation for the visual effect you (we)
observe. The further difference is (as Paul and a few others pointed out)
comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens.
As you probably know
mount it on the A7ii.
First thing you see is how "swirly" the bokeh is at f4. Interesting look...
Here is the frame:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/49015261608/in/photostream/lightbox/
j
--
Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Can you believe they made a movie about bok/
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bokeh-2017
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
t;http://www.repiuk.nl/content/bokeh-cows/
>
>Q-S1 and 15-45 zoom
>
>Toine
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse any swypos.
http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
>From today's walking the dog:
Some mud:
http://www.repiuk.nl/content/murky-water-2/
and some blurred cows:
http://www.repiuk.nl/content/bokeh-cows/
Q-S1 and 15-45 zoom
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE f
I like the dragonfly, Jack. Nice catch there, but I wonder if a tighter crop
would help to minimize the background. Cheers, Christine
On Jul 12, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background.
Comments?
Jack
http
Probably so, but I consider the enhanced bokeh my reason for posting the image.
Perhaps oddly, in this case, I consider the bokeh a positive element. Help me!
J
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:58:42
Jack,
The current version is appropriate for this month.
The bokeh remindes me of fireworks exploding in the background.
Apropo for a Red Glider!
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Probably so, but I consider the enhanced bokeh my reason
Thanks for comment, Dan.
J
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 8:34:41 PM
Subject: Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)
Nice, but I like the original better. I find the bright yellow spot
on the left
On 7/12/2014 5:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background.
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=781
Link to the earlier one for comparison?
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must
Sorry, not available, John.
Thanks for commenting.
J
- Original Message -
From: John sesso...@earthlink.net
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:21:33 AM
Subject: Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)
On 7/12/2014 5:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Re-post of earlier
Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background.
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=781
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Nice, but I like the original better. I find the bright yellow spot
on the left in the Full Bokeh version a bit distracting.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
Re-post of earlier, but with full
On 5/4/2014 9:24 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip:
https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not
Horses for courses, but I prefer the F1.4 shot... May be, F2.0 would be
optimal here...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two.
On 5/4/2014 8:04 PM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced jerk), but I
believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas
of an image. What you are talking about
On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two.
Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of
focus, not what it out of focus. Anyone who says otherwise is wrong.
On 5/4/2014
On 5 May 2014, at 13:57, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two.
Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of
focus, not what
Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of
focus, not what it out of focus.
If you enjoy quality of life, for goodness sake never focus on a bookie.
Alan C
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http
Proofread Larry.
On 5/5/2014 1:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two.
Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of
focus, not what it out
He would, but it's all out of focus...
On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Proofread Larry.
On 5/5/2014 1:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority
:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two.
Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of
focus, not what it out of focus. Anyone who says
On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Proofread Larry.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
He would, but it's all out of focus…
Damn presbyopia. Whoever coined the
On 5/5/2014 6:43 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, John jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Proofread Larry.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On May 5, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote:
He would, but it's all out of
Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip:
https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not
--
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced jerk), but I
believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas
of an image. What you are talking about is the degree to which the
background is out of focus (akin to, but not precisely the same as,
depth of field -- I say
on 2014-05-04 18:04 Bryan Jacoby wrote
I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced jerk), but I
believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas
of an image.
i had the same thought on reading Tim's blog post (both about the definition of
bokeh and about how
F1.4 is, of course,vastly better.
ann
On 5/4/2014 14:24, Tim Bray wrote:
Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip:
https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
spock-voice Fascinating. /spock-voice
Thanks, Igor!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF
blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought
some people might enjoy this blog
, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
spock-voice Fascinating. /spock-voice
Thanks, Igor!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF
blur/bokeh being one of the assumed
of whatever that has
to be sharp in the frame :-).
On 4/17/2014 6:54 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF
blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought
some people might enjoy this blog post:
http
In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF
blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought
some people might enjoy this blog post:
http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2014/04/lens-blur-in-new-google-camera-app.html
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Bokehlicious!
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in
large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep
freezes ...
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker
I was even briefly contemplating titles such as Buckets o' Bokeh, but
thought better. ;-)
Thank you, Attila, Bob, Godfrey, Frank and Marco.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Bokehlicious!
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal
Merci bokeh ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO - Icy bokeh
I was even briefly contemplating titles such as Buckets o' Bokeh, but
thought better. ;-)
Thank you, Attila
For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in
large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep
freezes ...
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/
K-3, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 135mm/f:3.2, 1/400th sec, ISO 400, handheld.
Post in Lightroom
Ouu!
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in
large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep
freezes ...
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973
Very nice, Bruce!
Godfrey
On Dec 23, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Quite spectacular.
Cheers,
frank
Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in
large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep
freezes ...
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/
K-3, DA
Even more lovely.
-Marco
On Dec 23, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in
large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep
freezes ...
http://www.flickriver.com/photos
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
On 02/10/2012 23:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh.
If bokeh means blur, I have hard drives full of better pictures than those.
--
No fixed Adobe
I was thinking the same thing. Too bad that they only know half the
definition of bokeh.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Pity they're mistaking
: Interesting Bokeh Effects
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
what's interesting to me is that someone took the time to name these effects.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Dan Matyola
http
From: mike wilson
On 02/10/2012 23:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/
Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh.
If bokeh means blur, I have hard drives full of better pictures than those
A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says
it's a very appropriate gift for me:
http://goo.gl/3XtMe
Now, one might think this is a Dark Side mug, but in fact it is not!
Whoever made this mug changed *just enough* to not get sued. The brand
is not Canon, it's HOMADE:
My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ... !
G
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says
it's a very appropriate gift for me:
http://goo.gl/3XtMe
Godfrey:
Then DA* 200 and DA* 300 might be adequate.
:-)
Igor
Tue Jun 19 12:59:45 EDT 2012
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ... !
G
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+pdml at gmail.com wrote:
A good
I believe you could use the DA 300 for a pint of beer.
On 6/19/2012 1:34 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Godfrey:
Then DA* 200 and DA* 300 might be adequate.
:-)
Igor
Tue Jun 19 12:59:45 EDT 2012
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ...
take my coffee with creamy bokeh
A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says
it's a very appropriate gift for me:
http://goo.gl/3XtMe
Now, one might think this is a Dark Side mug, but in fact it is not!
Whoever made this mug changed *just enough* to not get sued
http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00aDI7?start=0
So it's April second, so sue me.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 2 April 2012 17:17, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00aDI7?start=0
So it's April second, so sue me.
I was late reading it too. Still made me laugh...especially the 4
first people who commented :-)
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --
2011/8/23 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Cotty wrote:
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net effect.
I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar.
I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker.
Trouble with me is
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling
gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http
Could use a little tweaking.
-- Walt
On 8/17/2011 8:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs,
and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http
, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures.
Very well done.
Thanks.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax
Could use a little tweaking.
-- Walt
We all feel that way sometimes, Walt, but don't worry, it'll pass.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On 8/24/2011 4:23 PM, Bob W wrote:
Could use a little tweaking.
-- Walt
We all feel that way sometimes, Walt, but don't worry, it'll pass.
B
Only to return again moments later.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net effect.
I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar.
I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker.
Trouble with me is when I should be hooking I'm netting, and when I
should be netting I'm hooking...
--
On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Cotty wrote:
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net effect.
I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar.
I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker.
Trouble with me is when I should be hooking I'm netting,
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net effect.
I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On Aug 21, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Cotty wrote:
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net effect.
I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar.
I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
Beautiful, nice bokeh. What lens and aperture?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM
Subject: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid
On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote:
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs,
and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife
favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian
paid modeling
gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures.
--
Larry Colen l
:
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling
gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy
refrain from comment. Must refrain... Must
On 8/17/2011 9:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid
modeling
gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh
On Aug 18, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Steve Larson wrote:
Beautiful, nice bokeh. What lens and aperture?
FA77 f/9.0 ISO 80 1/80 second with studio flashes
Steve
- Original Message - From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 17
and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote:
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite happy with the whole set
On 17/8/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
Lar that sucks :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 18/8/11, Sam L, discombobulated, unleashed:
Coffee out my nose and on my keyboard.
Always a pleasure at my expense :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 17/8/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
Lar that sucks :)
I don't know, I rather liked the net
On 18/08/2011 23:04, Sam L wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, mike wilsonm.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote:
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs,
and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like.
Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, Bokeh:
http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg
But, I'm quite
http://www.photographybay.com/2011/07/19/samsung-working-on-dslr-like-bokeh-for-compact-cameras/?awt_l=CE3oFawt_m=IyaKA6dGYv62xu
regards, Anthony
Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
(Anon)
--
PDML Pentax
Content just isn't compelling enough for me. Light, bokeh--etc fine.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 10:41 PM
Subject: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open
http
24, 2011, at 2:51, Bob W wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5382974835/
Tell me what you think even if you do not like it.
as a photograph that shows off the capabilities of the lens it's
excellent.
Light, colour, bokeh etc are beautiful. As a formal composition
it's
Boris, feel free to do whatever you want with the wording :)
--S
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for being late. I kind of dislike the bokeh, Sasha. It is nervous,
unpleasant. It seems that the distance between you, the guy and the rest
On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote:
I was lucky enough to get my copies of both books at list price, before they
really attracted attention from people on the internet. They sold out very
quickly and seem to have attained cult status.
Literally,
Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle
book, I guess that's up to you, but how much is actual ownership worth?
On 1/26/2011 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote:
I was lucky enough to get
If you don't trust Amazon, you can easily download all of your ebooks
to your computer. This is easy to do.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:00 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle book,
I guess that's up to you, but
On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote:
I was lucky enough to get my copies of both books at list price, before they
really attracted attention from people on the internet. They sold out very
On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle book, I
guess that's up to you, but how much is actual ownership worth?
On 1/26/2011 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 25,
Sorry for being late. I kind of dislike the bokeh, Sasha. It is nervous,
unpleasant. It seems that the distance between you, the guy and the rest
of the image, I mean, the relation between these distances, were not
enough to provide you with more well blurred background. It also seems
On 1/25/2011 3:05 AM, Bob W wrote:
This is the piece I'm referring to:
http://www.billjayonphotography.com/The%20Thing%20Itself.pdf
Thanks a lot!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Jan 24, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Bob W wrote:
This is the piece I'm referring to:
http://www.billjayonphotography.com/The%20Thing%20Itself.pdf
Hurn Jay have a lot to say about this question in On Being A
Photographer. Well worth reading. To summarise, subject matter is
everything.
Thanks
On 11-01-25 8:57 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 24, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Bob W wrote:
This is the piece I'm referring to:
http://www.billjayonphotography.com/The%20Thing%20Itself.pdf
Hurn Jay have a lot to say about this question in On Being A
Photographer. Well worth reading. To summarise,
On Jan 25, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
It is an excellent essay, and very interesting and relevant. Other than the
specific references to film, it reads like it was written yesterday.
Yes, it is. I will be reading it again many times over. Will probably get his
and Hurn's book,
It is an excellent essay, and very interesting and relevant. Other
than the specific references to film, it reads like it was written
yesterday.
Yes, it is. I will be reading it again many times over. Will probably
get his and Hurn's book, too, I think I'll avoid the expensive one --
over
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
