Thanks everyone! The last photo was a victim of an in-camera creative filter
and in-camera processing—so, yes, the color is off. Cheers, Christine
On Nov 12, 2014, at 1:12 PM, Chris Mitchell chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
I like them. No 8 particularly.
Are you sure the colour
I like them. No 8 particularly.
Are you sure the colour balance was set properly for the last one?
Chris
On 7 November 2014 18:44, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Hi Everyone:
On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I tried a few high ISO shots
at 51,200—and in some
Neat! With more contrast #3 would be a great abstract shot.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
Interesting results - there is the noise but there is also an altered
tonality. I like 4734_1 .
Mark
On 11/7/2014 1:44 PM,
You got some nice shots and interesting effects there. I quite like both
versions of 4734.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Interesting results - there is the noise but there is also an altered
tonality. I like 4734_1 .
Mark
On 11/7/2014 1:44 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Hi Everyone:
On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I tried a few high ISO shots at
51,200—and in some cases added a bit of flash,
Hi Everyone:
On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I tried a few high ISO shots at
51,200—and in some cases added a bit of flash, which was dialed down to EV
-2.00. The metadata is listed above each photo.
There are five images here--(virtually as shot)— with a tarted up version that
That's not bad at all, and you can improve them with a quick noise
reduction in ACR / Lightroom. For even better results you could try
noise reduction on each channel individually in PS, but that's not
quick anymore.
I like the first 2, nice framing!
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Christine
Thanks, Attila, but I was shooting to keep the noise—that is, incorporate noise
into the picture. Weird perhaps, but it was what I was experimenting for. :-).
Cheers, Christine
On Nov 7, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not bad at all, and you can
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Thanks, Attila, but I was shooting to keep the noise—that is, incorporate
noise into the picture. Weird perhaps, but it was what I was experimenting
for. :-). Cheers, Christine
Not weird at all, just something I
Good experiment.
The noise even contributes these images.
Perhaps I should also consider using ISO values higher than my comfort zone.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
I expected worse. Thanks for taking the time, Christine.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 10:44:42 AM
Subject: high iso experiment
Hi Everyone:
On the way to Newberry Library the other night, I
I like.
Paul via phone
On Nov 7, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Christine Aguila christ...@caguila.com wrote:
Thanks, Attila, but I was shooting to keep the noise—that is, incorporate
noise into the picture. Weird perhaps, but it was what I was experimenting
for. :-). Cheers, Christine
On Nov
12 matches
Mail list logo
