Message -
From: Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
I find Practical Photography (printed in UK) much better than
the Popular Photography.
I used to be reading it (some parts
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Just renewed my sub to the 37th. Frame - at least it's a sensible read!
How many issues is Mike up to now?
William Robb
About half?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Coyle Subject: Re: ist-DS
secrets in Pop Photo
Just renewed my sub to the 37th. Frame - at least it's a sensible read!
How many issues is Mike up to now?
William Robb
--
When you're worried or in doubt
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Just renewed my sub to the 37th. Frame - at least it's a sensible read!
How many issues is Mike up to now?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Not sure, William - he asked if I had safely received No.7, which I
haven't, and confirmed I'm subscribed up to No.15
Wow. I got issue 7 last October 12th, but nothing since.
You got a better deal than
I just came across a recent issue (possibly the latest?) of Popular
Photography and saw an article titled 10 Secrets if the ist-DS or
something similar. Besides being great to see such a great plug for
Pentax, I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice to
I just came across a recent issue (possibly the latest?) of Popular
Photography and saw an article titled 10 Secrets if the ist-DS or
something similar.
Yes - August 2005.
Fred
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that none
of the ten things written about are secrets at all. All you have to
do to find them and understand all about them is read the freekin'
manual, where they are clearly and plainly documented. And the manual
is easily
On 2/8/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that none
of the ten things written about are secrets at all. All you have to
do to find them and understand all about them is read the freekin'
manual, where they are
I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice to have on the ist-D: spot white balance (whereby
you can set custom white balance and the camera only reads the area
within the spot metering circle rather than averaging the entire frame).
Nice.
--
Mark
On Aug 2, 2005, at 9:58 AM, Andre Langevin wrote:
I was fascinated to note that the DS has one feature I commented
would have been nice to have on the ist-D: spot white balance
(whereby
you can set custom white balance and the camera only reads the area
within the spot metering circle
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that none
of the ten things written about are secrets at all. All you have to
do to find them and understand all
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:24 AM, William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
lol ... What I don't understand is why people would waste their time
reading Pop Photo when the manual is free and has so much more
information in it. '-)
Godfrey
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: [Norton
AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me off about this article is the fact that
none
should all be
thankful that Pentax is getting some ink. Remember the old PR adage: Good ink
is good ink, bad ink is good ink, no ink is bad ink.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
The thing that pisses me
William Robb grumped:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
I did read the manual and I still subscribe. I'm not sure if you counted me
in that three or not.
You can't ask for too much at a US dollar per issue. I've found enough
content to keep by subscribing
There are other things in the magazine. Sometimes (a few times a year)
I'll pick up a copy, mostly to read the ads and see if there's anything new
out in the world that may be interesting. Mostly I read it for free at a
book shop while enjoying a cuppa Joe. It's certainly not one of those mags
As Jimmy Durante sang: Ink-a-dink-a-doo
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember the old PR adage: Good ink is good ink, bad ink is good ink,
no ink is bad ink.
As I said before, I think we share a lot more curmudgeonly behaviors
than is often apparent. ;-)
I bought this issue ... first time in years I've purchased a Pop
Photo ... because I didn't have time to read it at the magazine
stand. I should have taken the time: it cost me $5 or so and
BTW, I waste my time reading it because, at that time, I've got some time
to waste.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
What I don't understand is why people would waste their time
reading Pop Photo
Pop Photos's in color! ;)
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:29:37 -0700
On Aug 2, 2005, at 10:24 AM, William Robb wrote:
If everyone read
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
Readers, Peter.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
Since we're bitching about magazines, I dropped Outdoor Photographer
because they pissed me off by putting all that Photoshop content in there.
They print too much stuff that has
I find Practical Photography (printed in UK) much better than
the Popular Photography.
I used to be reading it (some parts of it) regularly several years ago
(1999-2000 or so),
but then I found that I see less and less new material in it.
I concluded that on one hand the content of that magazine
My input on photographic magazines:
In used to subscribe to Amateur Photographer (UK) until about 18 months
ago. Dropped it because the news pages were always 4 weeks out of date.
The internet is much quicker, specifically DPR. The rest of it was
basically tosh, and since the advent of eBay, the
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I do, however, subscribe to two of the best (IMO) photographic
periodicals on the planet:
National Geographic and Foto8.
Thanks for the heads up on Foto8. I do subscribe to National Geographic and
Nature's Best.
Lewis
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
Why so many?
P. J. Alling wrote:
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one free
copy...
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
He wrote readers not recipients.
Oh I'm sure some advertising people can read...
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Have to be a lot more than that, each advertiser gets a least one
free copy...
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
He wrote readers not
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: ist-DS secrets in Pop Photo
William Robb wrote:
If everyone read the manual, Pop Photo would have 3 readers worldwide.
Why so many?
Two would be Canadians (one a Nikon user, the other a Canon shooter), the
other would
On Aug 3, 2005, at 4:43 AM, Cotty wrote:
I found one excellent tip on the internet that is mentioned nowhere
in my
camera owner's manual - it's possible to actually take some pretty
decent
pics with the derned thing ;-)
Do you mean I have to buy the DS to take good pics?
I'll trade the
31 matches
Mail list logo
