If it were me, I'd be torn between something wider than a 28
and plugging that hole between 50 and 100Macro with an 85. You
mention the bag is getting heavy. How will another lens help that
situation? Lens Lust, the Flattener of Fototographer Footies.
Butch Black wrote:
Hi Guys;
I have
On May 14, 2004, at 5:22 AM, Butch Black wrote:
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
Throw in a couple of bricks for a while. When you take them out it'll
feel light.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
Throw in a couple of bricks for a while. When you take them out it'll
feel light.
There's some logic in that.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Butch Black wrote:
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup: Z-1p, K1000, K 28/3.5, K 35/3.5, M 50/1.4, A
50/1.7, M 50/2.0, M 100/4.0 macro,
The 300 is a big, heavy lens. Could you do without it on a regular
basis?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/13/04 01:22PM
Hi Guys;
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup:
Do you carry all that with you when you go out to photograph? If so, fer
gawd sake, why?
Shel Belinkoff
[Original Message]
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So
I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not
Hi Guys;
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy. So I'm
thinking of downsizing what I carry when I'm not shooting something
specific. My current lineup: Z-1p, K1000, K 28/3.5, K 35/3.5, M 50/1.4, A
50/1.7, M 50/2.0, M 100/4.0 macro, M 135/3.5, M 200/4.0, FA* 300/4.5,
Do you carry all that with you when you go out to photograph? If so, fer
gawd sake, why?
Shel Belinkoff
A back up body in case of camera failure. The lenses under the assumption
that the lens left behind would be the one I needed. As the body of my
question states the kit has gotten too heavy
On 13/5/04, HERMANN, discombobulated, offered:
I have gotten to that point where my camera bag has gotten too heavy.
My God. Only now? You have been remarkably froogle in your kit purchase Butch!
I think that happened to me about ten minutes after I bought some Pentax
gear, mind you, the bag
On 13 May 2004 at 13:22, Butch Black wrote:
Hi Guys;
I'm thinking of breaking it down to 2 bags. The main bag would be the Z-1p, 35,
50/1.4, 135, 300, and the flash. The #2 bag would be the rest minus the m
50/2.0. Obviously if I'm shooting something that another lens would be useful I
can
10 matches
Mail list logo
