Hi guys,
Once again an item at my local camera shop is tempting me :)
This time it's a Pentax digital spotmeter. At the moment I use a Sekonic L328
with the 5-degree spot attachment. The only problems I have with it are
parallax error at close distances, the fact that I can't read the EV
I don't use 'em, and I don't want to be a collector, so here are a few
items that are looking for a good home:
SMCT 35/2.0
SMCT 35/3.5
SMCT 28/3.5
ST 50/1.4
Macro Tak 50/4.0 converted to K-mount
ST 105/2.8
SMCT 105/2.8
Spot F
Pål,
I haven't put my pack on the scale, but what you write seems very
much in line with my own experience. -Even if I'm not a mountain
goat...:-)
My 645 kit contains the house, A*300/4, A120/4 macro, A75/2.8,
A45/2.8, right angle viewfinder and one spare film holder. This
fits very neatly
David ...
I've a Pentax Digital Spotmeter and think it's wonderful. If you
understand its workings you'll find that it'll give you about 1/6 stop
readings. I have nothing negative to say about this meter except
that, in very low light situations, it's sometimes hard for me to find
the central
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: Personal gallery update, comments will be appreciated
You have some cute kids.
Believe me, with four of them it's often hard to say that!
-
Memories fade faster than Crystal Archive.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
The Muse is a meanie who keeps nagging and poking and prodding me
and reminding me to make pictures and music, and when I manage
to ignore those, she becomes a temptress, dresses up in available
light, and dangles sultry sounds and seductive image ideas before
me until the tools of my craft,
I photograph to put the outdoors that I love onto film.
David S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
In a message dated 26/08/01 20:54:47 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finally, a couple of questions -
1. With a grip attached, what do LXers do to attach a strap - and *don't*
want to hang it vertically (using the two free lugs) ?
We are still trying to obtain the spare
Photography to me is a blend of artistic creativity technological
expertise that fulfills my childhood dream to show to people the things I
see, which I could not pursue when I found I was not really that talented
artist and wont be able to make living with it and realized that I dont
Bob wrote:
BW It is very difficult psycholgically to do this, imo. Loading a colour
BW film, then trying to shoot with a bw mindset is something I
BW personally just can't do. Other people perhaps have no problem doing
BW it.
I really doubt others shoot colour and bw the same way.
If one
Ann
According to the Edmund Scientific website, polarizing film can be had for
about $15 for a sheet 8.5 inches by 5 inches or a 2 inch square 2 pack can
be had for $6.40. As I understand it you need two pretty strong strobes
since you'll be losing a lot of light. To orient the films overlay
I can't draw.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Adelheid wrote:
Bill Peifer Mars Rising: A Self-Portrait
I had a closer look at your pic and realized that cropping might do it
some good. Get rid of the bright light on the left side and cut the sky
a bit. I like the colours though. The warm light between the trees and
the sky is very nice.
Show Me the Money! !8^)
(... of course there's always pretty girls friends, too)
Bill
-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
me toobob poe
--- Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To speak in another language.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Me too. Yellow for most things - orange for a lot of stuff,
too.
as for film - TX developed in Microdol 1:3 for fine grain.
Just to add a me three: I like to shoot with a #25 red most of the
time when I'm shooting bw (and not shooting in the dark or near-dark).
Yes,
It's one of the things that keeps myself alive.
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I see, therefore I photograph.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
At 08:46 AM 8/27/2001 +0200, you wrote:
BTW, the MiniTrekker is a great piece of luggage! Small, but big
enough. Photographic equipment has a tendency to behave like ideal
gases, it eventually occupies all available volume. So keeping the
bag small is importatnt.
Speaking of bags, did you guys
I have 20 models to shoot this weekend ( don't ask how
I fell into this ) and need advise on good medium
light colour film. There will be outdoor and indoor
with on camera flash and non ttl light stand. What do
you recomend oh guru .
___
Do You
Paul wrote:
Do you notice any different between your shots with the 645 and your 35mm
when they arnt blown up toa huge size?
Yes. If you need huge size of prints to spot the difference they you're really judging
the quality of the print process, not the original.
I contrast to common
I have so many reasons to photograph, that I have none.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
In couple of weeks I will be able to sell my A* 135/1.8 lens.
I was planning the e-bay route but if someone will give me an acceptable offer I might
save that hassle.
The lens is in very nice shape. Glass is perfect. Some brassing on aperture ring.
Comes with original lens hood and hard
FS: Pentax-A 2X-L Converter in original box with leather case w/manual. Close to mint.
270USD
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
FS: Pentax-A 2X-S Converter in excellent shape. In original box + manual and leather
case. 160USD
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
I do photograph because it's easier for me than talking, and as
much necessary as breathing.
Gianfranco
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from
Fuji 200
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Aaron need film advise
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:38:01 -0400 (EDT)
I have 20 models to shoot this weekend ( don't ask how
I fell into this ) and need advise on good medium
light colour film.
Snap, cracle, pop, oh n!
Jeff.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I want a reminder of at least a small percentage of what I have seen
and experienced, especially as forgetful as I am.
César Matamoros II
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brewer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Sorry I am not the guru, but I would go with Fuji Reala or Kodak Portra
160NC.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:38 AM
Subject: Aaron need film advise
I have 20 models to shoot this
Hi ...
I have both the Digital (Zone VI modified) and the analog Spotmeter
V. There are times when I prefer the analog view as it shows the
relationship between exposure values without having to take one's eye
from the meter, and because, in very low light, it's easier for me to
see the center
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version of those
things I see.
That's difficult for me to understand. How can a photograph be more
perfect than what exists in the real world, even with the real world's
imperfections? Can you make a more perfect
I'm guessing that he really is meaning to expose to the viewer a different
perspective that he would otherwise might not have seen. There is wonder
and beauty all around us if we but take the time to explore and recognize.
Photography can be a way to encourage people to do so.
Bruce Dayton
I posted some time ago that I thought it unlikely that I'd buy one. Two
just arrived in our office, though, so I took one home over the weekend.
My impression of its usability is not positive. I'm not trying to start
a flame war, or question anyone else's impression of the camera. My
impression
Are there drawbacks to this method versus using a traditional darkroom?
-Rich
tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
At 08:08 AM 8/26/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Tom your response tweaked my interest.Could you quickly explain
the process,might be interested in trying this.
*My Abridged
Well well well, isn't it funny how things happen? I've occasionally
grumbled here about my lack of success in finding a working replacement
for my A 50/1.7. Well, this was a holiday weekend here in the UK, and
we were off to the annual family gathering, so I made a dash into town
on Saturday
Clive Williams wrote:
Imagine my astonishment when I saw a
43 Limited at a price I could not
possibly refuse [...] Still in a bit
of a spin - does Enablement always
feel like this?
Sometimes it feels even better!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why should I use a meter?
There is no difference in the process of developing BW film
regardless of whether you have a real or traditional darkroom or are
working out of the trunk of your car, as Weegee did. The only
difference is where you'd load the film into the developing tank and,
perhaps, some convenience factors.
I can... :-D
Gianfranco
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's difficult for me to understand. How can a photograph
be more
perfect than what exists in the real world, even with the real
world's
imperfections? Can you make a more perfect flower, or a more
perfect
human, or a
No, for rollfilm, unless you are using sheet film or machine
processing...this IS the traditional darkroom method...just does not need to
be in a darkroom. I use a changing bag and load my developing tank sitting
in my lazyboy chair. Everything else is be done in daylight...even in a
darkroom
Pål wrote:
The fact that a Pentax 645n system covering
focal length from approximately 20mm to 200mm
(in 35mm terms) can be had at the same weight
as a high-end 35mm system, is a deciding
factor for me. In spite of the virtues of
35mm, MF open up image posibilities.
Two thoughts...
1)
I take pictures for the memory, for the time when I couldn't make one
anymore.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
Why do I photograph?
I see, therefore I photograph.
William Robb
This was the first thought I had. Those exact words.
I photograph to emphasize the ordinary and make it extraordinary.
Eric Lawton
_
Get your FREE download of MSN
Well, given that I never seem to get around to actually getting my exposed
rolls *developed*, I'd have to say I take pictures because I love the feel
of the various mechanisms in an SLR working.
-Rich
Doug Brewer wrote:
Hi.
Since our man Mike appears to be busy elsewhere right now, I
At 12:22 PM 8/27/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Are there drawbacks to this method versus using a traditional darkroom?
This *is* the traditional method of developing film.
A darkroom is necessary for conventional printing. If you happen to have
one, it's a convenient place to handle film. If you
I have not been able to get more details about this camera just that its most likely
not right around the corner. Perhaps we can expect release sometimes next year. The
only confirmation on features was the presence of mirror lock.
Rumors says it also has redesigned flash circuitry. This can
My future aspirations based solely on the past.
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
www.macads.co.uk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Joseph wrote:
I'm not trying to start
a flame war, or question anyone else's impression of the camera. My
impression is conditioned by having been using the 1p, and by the size
of my hands.
My hands a very large and I also come from the Z-1p. he Z-1p don't fit large hands. In
order to use
so the pork pie turned out much testier, huh ?
congratulations on the find.
From: Clive Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Enabled - and I only went out for a pork pie
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:23:29 +0100
Well well well, isn't
- Grab it with your right hand (not left).
- Staighten your thumb and press it towards the back of the camera so that it rest on
the main control dial.
- You'll see that the hold switch, AE-L, light switch, and AF button forms an arc.
This means that they can be reached with small movement of
I got to try the MZ-S in a local store. I think I like
the ZX-5n better, for being simpler and more intuitive. The
dials are bigger and easier to turn than the MZ-S also.
Just the other day, I shot a whole role with the 5n, without
realizing that I had put it in spotmetering mode and on auto
I'm curious. At least Pål, and maybe others have both LX and MZ-S. We have
compared quite often the PZ-1p and MZ-S, but not really the LX vs. MZ-S.
Other than low light metering, is there anything else about the LX that
would have you keep both bodies? Anybody with experience?
Bruce Dayton
I have only fiddled with the MZ-S for a couple of minutes, but the
one I touched had exactly the same problem; the wheel was next to
impossible to spin with one finger. It was pretty obvious it
wasn't intended to be that way.
Faulty or not, it's probaly worth the effort to get it fixed
Bruce wrote:
I'm curious. At least Pål, and maybe others have both LX and MZ-S. We have
compared quite often the PZ-1p and MZ-S, but not really the LX vs. MZ-S.
Other than low light metering, is there anything else about the LX that
would have you keep both bodies? Anybody with
Thanks for the comparison. You mentioned you would like a modern LX. What
does that mean? AF, spot meter? Please describe.
Thanks,
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:27 PM
Doug Brewer wrote:
Write one sentence. In that sentence, tell us why you photograph
OK, I'm game. The answer could vary depending on when and where you ask,
but if I had to distill it down to one essential sentence, it might be
something like the following:
I photograph in order to
I may want to see the people and things around me today, tomorrow.
Cory Waters
Atlanta, GA USA
AIM = seebwaters
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
It is easy, I discovered, to turn the camera off
by accident if you use the selector dial with the camera at
your eye.
How is this possible? Never experienced it.
Nor have I. I use my right thumb on the back of the camera to move the
selector dial. Since the shutter release is on
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shel, didn't you get a brand new one?
Indeed i did smile
About what would something like that
cost, including finder and screens that
would be most common to use?
I bought mine without a finder as I already had several finders, so I
can't address that point.
We again try to make the Do you prefer a hammer or a screw driver.
takes both to build a house.
I get both,
thanks,
Phil
---
Thanks for the comparison. You mentioned you would like a modern LX. What
does that mean? AF, spot meter? Please describe.
Thanks,
I've
recently acquired an LX and share your views. I was looking at Nikon F3's
but decided to find an equivalent camera that would fit my K-mount lenses.
I have never seen a better full-system camera than the
LX!
"1. With a grip attached, what do LXers do to
attach a strap - and *don't*
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:00:53 +0200, you wrote:
snip
...this is getting slightly tedious
Amen.
Pal has described quick and convenient flash
compensation with the MZ-S. I am already aware that
flash compensation is quick and convenient on the PZ1p,
especially for the set it and forget it
Bruce wrote:
You mentioned you would like a modern LX. What
does that mean? AF, spot meter? Please describe.
It means AF and spot metering for sure. Otherwise it means keeping as much of essence
of the LX as posible. What this really means in reality is something I would know when
I see
Bob wrote:
Two thoughts...
1) The next flagship may be a 645, as noted before.
The flagship has exclusively mentioned in the context of 35mm
2) The smooth textures and subtle tones Pål talked about may be the next 'edge' for
film vs digital photos and cameras. The imaging CCD gets so big
Brendan wrote:
I have 20 models to shoot this weekend ( don't ask how
I fell into this ) and need advise on good medium
light colour film. There will be outdoor and indoor
with on camera flash and non ttl light stand. What do
you recomend oh guru .
How'd I get to be the guru??
I
I notice subtle details through the viewfinder of a camera that I might
otherwise miss through casual observation.
Rob Woerner
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 11:48 PM
Subject: One Sentence
Hi.
Since our
Well, then, you don't need film - or a camera fro that matter. Just a
viewfinder! Think of the savings!
From: Robert Woerner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I notice subtle details through the viewfinder of a camera that I might
otherwise miss through casual observation.
-
This message is from the
It's very simple: Write one sentence. In that sentence, tell us why you
photograph.
I want to capture for permanence a vista or moment in time that I think I
see in my mind's eye.
Chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version of those
things I see.
I hope you don't realy mean quite that - very sad, if so.
annsan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version of those
things I see.
and Shel objected to the premise of the sentence.
Unfortunately, I was unable to reply when I had Shel's message in hand,
but his main contention seemed to be that a photograph
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 at 16:41:14 -0500, John Mustarde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] declaimed, to the delight of the assembled
multitude:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:49:42 -0400, you wrote:
John, I was wondering what about the sideway support is of concern to you? I use
the Kirk King Cobra head with my 600
The design philosophy of the MZ-S is much closer to that of the LX than it is to that
of the PZ-1p, so I think the MZ-S and the LX make a good pair. That's the pair in my
main bag right now.
But you can find out for yourself, Bruce. KEH has an LX in EX+ shape right now for (!)
$789US and an
I saw the LX at KEH. I was thinking that seemed a little high. What is the
concensus? KEH Ex+ condition with FA-1W finder for $789.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:00 PM
Isn't that a bit of an overreaction? What can possibly be very sad about
it?
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: One Sentence
I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version
Aside from my sloppy comparative use of the absolute perfect. (it
_was_early in the morning :-), I meant exactly what I said. And it is
certainly not sad, at least not to me. If your reality is always
beautiful, always worth preserving exactly as it is, then you are a very
fortunate woman. My
Kevin, again, thanks so much --
I'm leaving all you wrote below because I archive things in
my sent mail - hope other PDMLers don't mind - I think your
info is very um illuminating - and I'm not surprised that
it turns up in something George Lepp wrote -- I used to read
him religiously. Having
I enjoy the challenge of trying to take an excellent photogragh, from both
the technical and creative standpoint.
Dan Sheetz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Brewer
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hey Folks,
I've got a couple of questions about the FA 100/2.8 Macro. Well first off, I
ordered an F 100/2.8 Macro from KEH in EX condition. What they sent was an
FA 100/2.8 Macro in EX. Not bad for $235 eh?
Anyways, how does the clamp feature work? It's my understanding that it's
supposed to
An excellent question Doug. If one really knows what one wants out of something one
should be able
to condense it down to one brief sentence. The closest I can come, and it only covers
first base,
is:
I take photographs so I can collect things that are too big, too expensive, too
delicate, or
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I saw the LX at KEH. I was thinking
that seemed a little high. What is the
concensus? KEH Ex+ condition with FA-1W
finder for $789.
Bruce - it depends on which LX it is. I'd stay away from an earlier
one at almost any price.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:09:10 -700, you wrote:
The F* ED(IF) 300mm f/4.5 tripod mount fits into a ring with detents
on the lens body, so you can turn the camera on its side without
flipping the tripod mount out of its normal position.
Is the lens under discussion engineered in the same way?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:50:18 -0700, you wrote:
The clamp knob adds drag to the focus ring.
Try rotating the focus ring with the clamp off, then
with it on. The focus ring should be spin very freely
with the clamp off, but have a definite manual focus
like resistance with the clamp on.
Keep
I have the Mz-S, Pz-1p, and LX.
To me, the finder on the LX is unrivaled. It is not as bright as
the others and does not seem to be as sharp on the ground glass, but it
offers a much bigger view of things. You really have to look
through it to see what I mean. I also think that for manual focus
Sorry to rain on your boosterism, but while the flash compensation
technique you describe works, it is indeed a cumbersome work around.
I use flash compensation mostly for shooting birds and macro shots. With
birds that means slow flash synch. My technique with the Pz-1p:
1. Set flash to
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
I enjoy using technical tools to make a more perfect version of those
things I see.
I don't find that strange. Since the ancient Greeks, from Thucidies to
Plato, we have been discussing image and reality.
Regards, Bob S.
-
This message is from the
I take photographs to capture a magical moment in time that I, and I
hope others, would want to relive in days to come.
--
Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801
Powered by Linux ++ Mailed by Kmail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
My memory sucks, and it's getting worse as I get older. :-)
TTYL, DougF
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I just sent the confirmations for the September gallery. If you
didn't recieve one and think you should have, please reply to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try rotating the focus ring with the clamp off, then
with it on. The focus ring should be spin very freely
with the clamp off, but have a definite manual focus
like resistance with the clamp on.
Ah yes, now I sense the drag. It was a little too subtle
Oh, yea. I forgot. This technique is also useful in photographing rocks. It brings
out some interesting colors.
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Cross Polar Flash
Bucky wrote:
Isn't that a bit of an overreaction? What can possibly be very sad about
it?
Getting into subtle syntactical things here - didn't mean to
sound quite so
intense - but then Paul admitted to not having said
initially _exactly_
what he meant. Since he wrote a long response to
doesn't anyone read their own post?
I can see doing it once... maybe.
- -- =_NextPart_000_01C12F49.3EFD72C0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
PAUL STENQUIST wrote: (mainly in response to annsan)
Aside from my sloppy comparative use of the absolute perfect. (it
_was_early in the morning :-), I meant exactly what I said. And it is
certainly not sad, at least not to me.
Will you substitute, perhaps, unfortunate for sad? We are
On Monday, August 27, 2001 1:48 PM, Doug Brewer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi.
SNIP
It's very simple: Write one sentence. In that sentence, tell us why you
photograph. No restrictions on sentence length. It can be simple and
declarative. It can be a Faulknerian odyssey. It just needs to
I take photographs so I can collect things that are too big, too
expensive, too delicate, or
unavailable for me to take home with me.
You know, the first time I read this sentence I swear I thought
you meant expensive lenses and such. :)
I think it's time for me to go to bed...
--Amita
-
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
If you do want easy flash compensation in program mode buy the new
flash. It offers substantial improvement of whats possible on the
Z-1p. You don't even have to worry about flash synch since it will
synch at all speed.
But are you sure
97 matches
Mail list logo
